War Hawk Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 11 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Has anyone in a leadership position said that Chaos pre-empting BK sphere was the wrong thing to do or are you simply peddling bs? "All Chaos Bloc Alliances of Anti-Memesphere must include a statement recognizing that their CB was outdated and therefore invalid" 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 2 hours ago, War Hawk said: "All Chaos Bloc Alliances of Anti-Memesphere must include a statement recognizing that their CB was outdated and therefore invalid" So peddling bs. Good to know. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Epi Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 (edited) 1 Edited February 18, 2021 by Epi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Etat Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 Sad to see you go TF, however your assistance was appreciated, if not by the minority of people on the various forums, then at least by the majority of folk who are still busy fighting!! Whatever your reasons for entering and subsequently leaving, our reasons for continuing the good fight remain sound in the face of the brittle and largely spurious commentary from coalition B. All the best in your future. 1 Quote Celer Et Audax Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefonteen Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 5 hours ago, Tiberius said: So peddling bs. Good to know. If by bs you mean: Statements proven by evidence and logs. Outta here, garden troll. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alyster Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 9 hours ago, Tiberius said: Has anyone in a leadership position said that Chaos pre-empting BK sphere was the wrong thing to do or are you simply peddling bs? Yes, read the leaked logs. It was one of your original surrender terms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brucemna Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 Who cares now about this semantic of validity 8 months later. Deal with today and move on. Seriously this argument is so repetitive it is like coalition A finding a excuse to keep this going. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 6 hours ago, Prefonteen said: If by bs you mean: Statements proven by evidence and logs. Outta here, garden troll. No. It's pretty simple, he still hasn't proven that anyone said the action of pre-empting was wrong. All he has proven is that a negotiable term says that the CB was outdated and because it was outdated it was invalid to use as a CB. That still doesn't show someone saying that pre-empting as an action was wrong. The evidence provided also only becomes a statement if you agree to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micchan Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 On 1/21/2020 at 6:02 PM, Salt Meat said: snip Ok now I understand their decision, bad for us because they were really needed But I would have done differently, some of their allies are still at war and I believe that leaving them alone is not very honorable, I would continue for a couple of weeks and see if the status quo can be changed, then end with white peace all together (it was pretty clear that IQ was ready to peace with them at any time to avoid having to many nations to fight), the reasons are: -You don't look like a pixel hugger, some people now think they were waiting for an excuse to peace -Your players have war experience, you will be ready for future battles -You look strong, they have a lot of upper tier nations in Fark, WTF, etc. that can kick asses in this situation and a lot of low tiers to fight GOONS and the pigs -You show that you don't leave any of your allies alone if attacked, the block is strong Then if you lose TCW will be rolled while you can have white peace and save most of your pixels, if you win you roll TCW post war Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Singha Posted January 23, 2020 Share Posted January 23, 2020 19 hours ago, Micchan said: Then if you lose TCW will be rolled while you can have white peace and save most of your pixels, if you win you roll TCW post war Or TCW can attack the Federation now and possibly expand the war (again) ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeric Posted January 23, 2020 Share Posted January 23, 2020 Why would TCW hit TF? As far as I know we have no ill will toward them... (Not gov so just a staffer point of view) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buorhann Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 On 1/22/2020 at 5:18 AM, brucemna said: Who cares now about this semantic of validity 8 months later. Deal with today and move on. Seriously this argument is so repetitive it is like coalition A finding a excuse to keep this going. Huh, interesting. What would you say in reference to those citing actions taken back in 2016? 17 hours ago, Singha said: Or TCW can attack the Federation now and possibly expand the war (again) ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Only one side has attacked their previous support/allies after they got peace. Quote Warrior of Dio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfPCFQfOnLg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brucemna Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 (edited) 6 hours ago, Buorhann said: Huh, interesting. What would you say in reference to those citing actions taken back in 2016? Only one side has attacked their previous support/allies after they got peace. It is precedence which was set and in a elawyer way. Now bickering and arguing over semantics constantly in every thread about the who did this and who did that is just well Shut the F... up kind of thing that is just repetitive annoying and most of all unacomplishing. Edited January 24, 2020 by brucemna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Scarfalot Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 (edited) 14 hours ago, brucemna said: It is precedence which was set and in a elawyer way. Now bickering and arguing over semantics constantly in every thread about the who did this and who did that is just well Shut the F... up kind of thing that is just repetitive annoying and most of all unacomplishing. At what point are you going to realize you're describing yourself? You're tiresome, which is arguably worse than even Minesome. Edited January 24, 2020 by Sir Scarfalot double even Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brucemna Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 13 minutes ago, Sir Scarfalot said: At what point are you going to realize you're describing yourself? You're tiresome, which is arguably worse than even Minesome. Nastily bot as bad as urself though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 25, 2020 Share Posted January 25, 2020 3 hours ago, Sir Scarfalot said: At what point are you going to realize you're describing yourself? You're tiresome, which is arguably worse than even Minesome. The irony is strong with this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MIB.HG Posted January 25, 2020 Share Posted January 25, 2020 23 hours ago, Buorhann said: only one side has attacked their previous support/allies after they got peace. https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=106305&display=war Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micchan Posted January 25, 2020 Share Posted January 25, 2020 4 hours ago, MIB.HG said: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=106305&display=war Arrgh being Arrgh (and KT being another version of Arrgh) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRM Posted January 25, 2020 Share Posted January 25, 2020 4 hours ago, MIB.HG said: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=106305&display=war Smh. WTF has so many high tier. Should've countered HC. Darn pixel huggers! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HARPER.txt Posted January 25, 2020 Share Posted January 25, 2020 2 hours ago, Micchan said: Arrgh being Arrgh (and KT being another version of Arrgh) Arrgh being T$/TCW sugar babies and KT being Thalmors prodigal offspring* ftfy Quote -SAXON- -Warband Leader of the Nordic Sea Raiders- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.