Hassan Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 Welcome home, TCW! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post ReuKinChe Posted January 12, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted January 12, 2020 "The Inquisition entered this war under the rather childish delusion that they were going to roll everyone else, and nobody was going to roll them. Against the Syndicate, micros, and half a dozen other alliances, they put their rather naive theory into operation. They sowed the wind, and now they are going to reap the whirlwind." If anything, I hope this reveals the folly of the 'might makes right' mentality. When one uses force as an argument, it invites a forceful response. Whether we win or not, I hope that this response shatters Coalition B's delusions about the order of things. 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post deletethisaccount Posted January 12, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted January 12, 2020 3 hours ago, Roquentin said: TCW's reasons for hating Coal B are unrelated to any of the moral stuff. They just hate certain alliances on our side and also like to hug pixels so they see us as way for their GPA people be safe by building out of range. If it was feasible for TCW to not be inconvenienced by people getting beiged and hitting them, they would have never cared. I guess as long as their questionable allies didn't get reported. Roq, your ability to make up garbage and constantly act like a wanker never ceases to amaze me. We do hate Col B because of moral stuff, but I wouldn't expect you to understand morals - You've made it perfectly clear by your actions that morals are beyond your comprehension. Sure, we hate certain alliances, GOONs being a prime example. However let's not pretend its just GOONs - We hate your garbage agenda that's killing the game that so many used to enjoy, and for that we hate BK/NPO and all those who are complacent with you rolling people out of the game. Believe it or not mate, after rolling other players, many of which including our friends, for over 6 months and in return having to deal with your incessant lying, coming up with a new excuse every single time we asked you to peace out with Col A, we kind of got sick of your shit. We were strung along and along, promised a peace deal that would never come. Evidently, this had been brewing for a long time. And no, mate, we don't hug pixels - Which is a pretty awful statement considering we fought alongside you for over half a year. We got rolled for almost a month at the beginning, yet we retained our membership and rebuilt into a proper fighting force that has had a substantial impact on the war. The pixel hugger argument is void when you send us to do your dirty work for the entire length of the war. So, cheers for killing the game, you're a complete tool. 6 14 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 6 minutes ago, Skepta said: Roq, your ability to make up garbage and constantly act like a wanker never ceases to amaze me. So, cheers for killing the game, you're a complete tool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roquentin Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 (edited) 22 minutes ago, Skepta said: Roq, your ability to make up garbage and constantly act like a wanker never ceases to amaze me. We do hate Col B because of moral stuff, but I wouldn't expect you to understand morals - You've made it perfectly clear by your actions that morals are beyond your comprehension. Sure, we hate certain alliances, GOONs being a prime example. However let's not pretend its just GOONs - We hate your garbage agenda that's killing the game that so many used to enjoy, and for that we hate BK/NPO and all those who are complacent with you rolling people out of the game. Believe it or not mate, after rolling other players, many of which including our friends, for over 6 months and in return having to deal with your incessant lying, coming up with a new excuse every single time we asked you to peace out with Col A, we kind of got sick of your shit. We were strung along and along, promised a peace deal that would never come. Evidently, this had been brewing for a long time. And no, mate, we don't hug pixels - Which is a pretty awful statement considering we fought alongside you for over half a year. We got rolled for almost a month at the beginning, yet we retained our membership and rebuilt into a proper fighting force that has had a substantial impact on the war. The pixel hugger argument is void when you send us to do your dirty work for the entire length of the war. So, cheers for killing the game, you're a complete tool. Your leader had zero issues with it for a long time until people felt inconvenienced. He's in there all the logs. You can pretend you're being super moral and stuff. It's your own allies that knew everything going on. It's not my problem if you couldn't stomach playing your part in a war your alliance caused to happen in the worst possible fashion. Let's not forget. Um, you constantly recruited deserters and it was dumb to let you do that and the constant pushing was about not being able to buy more stuff. I don't think this is going work man. Like if you need to warp into a self-soothing false narrative then you don't know what actually happened in the war. There were no issues with "our agenda" until November earliest. lol We gave you the opportunity to shine at great expense and this was the thanks we got. Your alliance constantly painted itself as having cast aside as deadweight by your "friends". It was referenced a few weeks ago. Most of the hard stances we've taken are because of how the other side acted towards our intervention. Anyone who was chill got off easy. We cleared the path for you to restore your military reputation. Just because it became inconvenient for you doesn't change how we got here. Edited January 12, 2020 by Roquentin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HARPER.txt Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 @Sphinx You know how much i dislike you on a personal level ❤️ but we here now so give em' hell o7 greenies #roqmanbad 1 5 Quote -SAXON- -Warband Leader of the Nordic Sea Raiders- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Epi Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 (edited) 1 Edited February 18, 2021 by Epi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post deletethisaccount Posted January 12, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted January 12, 2020 9 hours ago, Roquentin said: Your leader had zero issues with it for a long time until people felt inconvenienced. He's in there all the logs. You can pretend you're being super moral and stuff. It's your own allies that knew everything going on. It's not my problem if you couldn't stomach playing your part in a war your alliance caused to happen in the worst possible fashion. Let's not forget. Sphinxy did take issue with it. We all did. I've already stated this. If we were so contempt with it, then why did you begin completing isolating TCW? (signing into a bloc behind our back, ensuring Sphinxy had little to do with peace negotiations because he actually wanted peace, I can go on.) And sure, we've seen the logs, but in all fairness what was he going to do to stop IQ at that point? He had no support from other alliances. It would be political suicide to call you out on your garbage whilst you possess the most powerful coalition in the game. I want to point out that your "inconvenience" argument which you have repeatedly brought up makes no sense. The convenient thing for TCW to do would be to continue perma-warring coalition A. What we're doing now is an inconvenience, but a necessity that had to be undertaken for the good of the game. No, I'm not telling you that of our actions have been moral from the start of the war, its obvious they have been far from that. However, the fact is that we realised who the true enemy was long ago, and we took the appropriate steps necessary to attempt to stand up for ourselves. 9 hours ago, Roquentin said: We gave you the opportunity to shine at great expense and this was the thanks we got. Playing the victim card after purposefully rolling a good portion of people out of the game is peak delusion. Some serious 4D chess is going on there. The "opportunity to shine" is also pretty hilarious, when I think of 'shining' I don't think of parma-warring people on a nation-sim browser game. 9 hours ago, Roquentin said: Anyone who was chill got off easy. They've all been surrendered for months - I'd safely call that pretty chill. You're just intent on killing the game. 8 hours ago, Epi said: Lmao. Your bloc's debut was stealing, lying and cheating. Cranky Camelot!! Image removed. A warning was issued for Filter Evasion. 1 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 14 minutes ago, Epi said: Lmao. Your bloc's debut was stealing, lying and cheating. ...and getting rolled. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HARPER.txt Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 12 minutes ago, Epi said: Lmao. Your bloc's debut was stealing, lying and cheating. You don't wanna go down that road EPI I hoard things remember x, now i want you to repeat those words you said into the mirror /nice and slow now, with deep breathes, so you can hear it over that spite your mind is clogged up with ❤️ Quote -SAXON- -Warband Leader of the Nordic Sea Raiders- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Prefonteen Posted January 12, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted January 12, 2020 5 hours ago, Roquentin said: Are you being obtuse? They literally said it's supposedly because we brought them in because of TMC despite TMC being the aggressor. Their stated rationale to us is completely different. So hope you can further this narrative. TCW's reasons for hating Coal B are unrelated to any of the moral stuff. They just hate certain alliances on our side and also like to hug pixels so they see us as way for their GPA people be safe by building out of range. If it was feasible for TCW to not be inconvenienced by people getting beiged and hitting them, they would have never cared. I guess as long as their questionable allies didn't get reported. 4 hours ago, Roquentin said: It's one form of tedium for another. Like if we were doing real damage just by being at war, I could see the point. People don't think we're actually dominant though. That's why Sphinx said we'd be throwing in the towel to them and he leaked my response out of context. Nothing will change and you guys have set your course definitively. So what's the point? Should the positions of your alliances change and we have confidence in that then maybe, but otherwise, there isn't much to gain. 4 hours ago, Roquentin said: Except people on your side said he was toxic earlier, so it's clearly nothing to do with toxicity. Any toxicity we have is shared and being embraced by you. Hope that helps. He has no issues with anything except getting reported and I guess members being inconvenienced by getting hit. That's it. lol No. You don't get to do a no no u on toxicity. You don't get to gaslight on why the war continues either. Your coalition is at the end of the day architect of this situation. Fight your war and frick off with the spin. 7 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buorhann Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 I'm just glad everybody is waking up to what I've stated months ago. Quote Warrior of Dio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfPCFQfOnLg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mad Titan Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 Smh people wanted total war, but appear to have buyers remorse. I do like how people think tcw and a bunch of micros will do what kerchog couldn’t lmfao 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tankobite Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 8 hours ago, Roquentin said: Yeah you guys are champions of introspection and you're very self-critical. I've never seen a proud member of coalition A at all. Yet how many of our allies are fighting us now? Quote Quote Wine for courage, making love to a camp follower. Tomorrow the battalion leaves for Burgundy. Wine for courage, and two hours of sleep before dawn. Thank you, thank you recruiters You've got wine and a camp follower..thank you, thank you, recruiters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Filmore Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 13 minutes ago, Leo the Great said: Smh people wanted total war, but appear to have buyers remorse. I do like how people think tcw and a bunch of micros will do what kerchog couldn’t lmfao It's more or less we appreciate the giant middle finger they're giving Coalition B by flipping sides. What does that make them? The fourth or fifth alliance that didn't feel like dealing with BK and NPOs crap and decided they'd rather fight them instead of being their eternal slayyyve? 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReuKinChe Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 (edited) If there weren't a need to maintain good optics and convince the undecided players of this game, I would be dismissive of Roq's arguments, and address them like the unadulterated human waste that they are. Such a comment would be unproductive and unreasonable, so I will simply say this: in this thread we have a poster firing baseless assertions in what is likely a deliberate attempt to obfuscate the facts and gaslight those who read this forum. I'd recommend that those perusing this thread take all his comments with a grain of salt. In fact, I suggest that all readers take all comments here with a grain of salt, as it will be good practice for the future, and will have the same result as the first option: the total evaporation of any illusions as to the cogency of Roq's arguments. Edited January 12, 2020 by Reuben Cheuk 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Miller Posted January 12, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted January 12, 2020 8 minutes ago, Leo the Great said: will do what kerchog couldn’t lmfao Remind me, who ran to NPO for help? 8 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buorhann Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 31 minutes ago, Leo the Great said: I do like how people think tcw and a bunch of micros will do what kerchog couldn’t lmfao ? We wrecked you. You whined to NPO. NPO jumped in, we wrecked them. Eventually numbers just overwhelmed us. NPO later got GOONS and GPWC in. Personally I find it funny how you and your leadership core basically screwed up the war when you had it. Could've very easily have settled peace, but you got greedy, then demanding towards your allies. You got what you wanted, I suppose. 3 Quote Warrior of Dio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfPCFQfOnLg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Bolivar Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 (edited) 8 hours ago, Roquentin said: Seeker would have come back if it made progress. Sphinx has been kissy face with Coal A for a while and saying a lot to them gave them incentive to reject stuff. At this point, this isn't really about the original reasons anymore and this move is the culmination of enmity over moderation reports. I said on page one of this thread NPO would find a way insinuate commonwealth was to blame. Granted it was an easy prediction I know. Edited January 12, 2020 by Charles the Tyrant Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smith Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 Hamster guy: It doesn't matter what people think of us Also hamster guy: I will literally never stop arguing or admit I may have made a mistake somewhere 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexio15 Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 Lmfao Colo B has absolutely zero ground to talk about toxicity after some of the outrageous crap they have said. As for your claims of peace being close, sure it was buddy. Remember folks everyone bad man 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astryl Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 (edited) 4 hours ago, Leo the Great said: Smh people wanted total war, but appear to have buyers remorse. I do like how people think tcw and a bunch of micros will do what kerchog couldn’t lmfao Personally, I think we should go further. Let's start sending delete nation links in war decs. I'll convene Opus Dei. Edited January 12, 2020 by Jazz R Oppenheimer Quote Queen of Chaos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redarmy Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 Y'all mother's frickers need Jesus. 3 Quote "Though it starts with a fist it must end with your mind." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
namukara Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 What is that delightful smell in the air? Is that the NPO burning? ((ngl I can smell fire irl, going to have to check that out before the fire alarm goes off.)) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
namukara Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 3 hours ago, Leo the Great said: Smh people wanted total war, but appear to have buyers remorse. I do like how people think tcw and a bunch of micros will do what kerchog couldn’t lmfao These micros being: Alliances 5, 6, 9, 10, 14, 15, 20, 23 and 28 Outside of farksphere, we can add 3, 12, 13, 17, 22, 27 That's half the top 30. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.