Jump to content

Syndicate-North Point RoH


Prefonteen
 Share

Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, Roquentin said:

The motives aren't mysterious and Partisan is more than aware. Now no one can deny the motives when it's out in the open. You can go look in the right place for a certain screenshot.

Hidellith is low gov and gave his statement already. I don't know how NPO works, but in NP low gov don't decide policy. At best they get to suggest policy to the high gov. In this case the policy was set by me, and the orders to raid any nation's from both sides were delivered to the high gov.

I infact had to actually stop the milcom department from reacting as they're used to by sending counters, so please stop this pathetic attempt to suggest low gov sets or has the authority to define publicly or internally, NP policy.

 

Also, continue being totally not mad that I'm attacking your opponents in your other war, while NPO itself recognizes it's conflict with NP at this time as separate, thereby making it impossible for me to be part of the coalition for a different anyway. Nice name too, Fash Bash Festival. I'm more a technocratic socialist personally.

 

#notmadNPO

Edited by Akuryo
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kind of sad when a RoH of hostility needs posting not to randomly get warn points just because others think they have exclusive raiding rights to an alliance.

If a problem needs dealing with its they felt the need to post a RoH in order for the mods to let them raid...

  • Like 1

libertyribbon.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Akuryo said:

Hidellith is low gov and gave his statement already. I don't know how NPO works, but in NP low gov don't decide policy. At best they get to suggest policy to the high gov. In this case the policy was set by me, and the orders to raid any nation's from both sides were delivered to the high gov.

I infact had to actually stop the milcom department from reacting as they're used to by sending counters, so please stop this pathetic attempt to suggest low gov sets or has the authority to define publicly or internally, NP policy.

 

Also, continue being totally not mad that I'm attacking your opponents in your other war, while NPO itself recognizes it's conflict with NP at this time as separate, thereby making it impossible for me to be part of the coalition for a different anyway. Nice name too, Fash Bash Festival. I'm more a technocratic socialist personally.

 

#notmadNPO

It was part of a concerted action by NP. It gave it away. His isn't the only allusion.

The separate wars shtick was anticipated but the separation on the site is only for visual purposes. It doesn't entail an official stance either way due to the interconnection. The initial idea was to have it as a sub-conflict but it's not viable with the current set-up on the site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Roquentin said:

It was part of a concerted action by NP. It gave it away. His isn't the only allusion.

The separate wars shtick was anticipated but the separation on the site is only for visual purposes. It doesn't entail an official stance either way due to the interconnection. The initial idea was to have it as a sub-conflict but it's not viable with the current set-up on the site.

Your other evidence is... Members putting whatever they want for war Dec reasons because nobody told them to put anything specific? Weaksauce.

It's separate on the stats, the wiki, and even literally by name. You've also been attempting to negotiate peace with us and others separately, something you've in the past refused to Coalition A. Given this and a lack of any ties save an outdated rose prot from NP, it seems you're trying not only connect distinct groups and blocs that don't want it together, but that you're actually trying to connect two separate conflicts together.

 

All because you can't handle somebody outsmarting you and showing why when I end up in two separate wars in Stellaris, I GTFO out the old one as fast as possible. You messed up, it's fine, get over it, and stop crying tears over a bunch of low mid tier players in an aggressive alliance whose leader takes shots at pretty much everyone, having their fun raiding whoever they want. 

 

Maybe you'd have more fun as they are if you got less #notmad.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t even remember seeing a DoW from NPO for NP or Syndicate. If undeclared wars with no official DoW prevent people from declaring in wars with actual DoWs posted, would be pretty backwards and impossible to moderate fairly.

libertyribbon.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Akuryo said:

Your other evidence is... Members putting whatever they want for war Dec reasons because nobody told them to put anything specific? Weaksauce.

It's separate on the stats, the wiki, and even literally by name. You've also been attempting to negotiate peace with us and others separately, something you've in the past refused to Coalition A. Given this and a lack of any ties save an outdated rose prot from NP, it seems you're trying not only connect distinct groups and blocs that don't want it together, but that you're actually trying to connect two separate conflicts together.

 

All because you can't handle somebody outsmarting you and showing why when I end up in two separate wars in Stellaris, I GTFO out the old one as fast as possible. You messed up, it's fine, get over it, and stop crying tears over a bunch of low mid tier players in an aggressive alliance whose leader takes shots at pretty much everyone, having their fun raiding whoever they want. 

 

Maybe you'd have more fun as they are if you got less #notmad.

How exactly was it refused in the past? We even have an ongoing negotiation with one coalition A alliance.

It's not outsmarting; it's literally rigging. I can declare a "separate war" to do the same thing and it would just devolve into people filling slots and beiging. It's beyond flagrant and that's why no one else did it before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Roquentin said:

How exactly was it refused in the past? We even have an ongoing negotiation with one coalition A alliance.

It's not outsmarting; it's literally rigging. I can declare a "separate war" to do the same thing and it would just devolve into people filling slots and beiging. It's beyond flagrant and that's why no one else did it before.

Screenshot_20200111-014204.jpg

 

My supposed allies seem pretty #notmad about it as well. Perhaps there should be a quarantine before the virus spreads.

 

Edit: fun fact, NPs own announcement, mostly telling some of the new players to stop building too many steel units, doesn't even list Coalition A!

Screenshot_20200111-014810.jpg

So you ask "How come ya opened up hitting syndicate then?" Easy! Shortly after NP peaced, we made a contingency on what to do in the event, later proven by logs, that you were all traitorous snakes who'd hit or angle to hit people who peaced out already.

We decided, based on our position at the time, we'd simply not brother with attacking frontally and immediately adopt guerilla raids against both sides of the war. We couldn't really afford the resources to fight frontally anyways, so might as well slowly build up WCs by looting!

So when you hit and members suddenly needed orders, I invoked the contingency plan and stopped Milcom from sending counters. Now finding a non slotted, non beiged inactive without military in Co B is harder and more time consuming than for Co A. Which is why we went for Co A, specifically syndi, as well as that they'd be in less and probably had more to loot than KERCHTOG.

 

Past that members were told alliances we considered to be hostile enemies aligned with you and BK, and were told they're free to be raided at your leisure. Some have trouble finding targets or are even lady despite being ponged to find some, when this happens gov checks around co A to find one. We prefer upper tiers as they typically have more loot, and also have a higher #notmad index score.

 

What your other group of enemies choose to do with this rogue marauding is their choice. I can't control that, and I'm not gonna waste my time worrying or caring about it. You're free to worry for the both of us though!

 

#notmad

Edited by Akuryo
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

#MicroDrama

  • Haha 2
Quote

Former leader of Chocolate Castle 4/1/2021

"It's pretty easy to get abused by Rosey without being a weirdo about it" - Betilius

"Rosey is everything I look for in a fighter" - partisan

"I’m very much not surprised that Lossi has you blocked tbh" - @MCMaster-095

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Akuryo said:

I'll reveal the first peace term now: Avakael ceases his heresy of using Assault Horizon imagery. Also what Windy said.

You'll have to negotiate that with me, not the snek.

Le1AjCa.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dull Brain: maintaining treaties that ensure you're protected

Glowing Brain: building a coalition that fails to protect you

Galaxy Brain: Being wardeced by major alliances from both sides of the dial-up at the same time

  • Upvote 3

ribbon - golden steak.png

Feeding the alliance, one conquest at a time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Valid User Name said:

Dull Brain: maintaining treaties that ensure you're protected

Glowing Brain: building a coalition that fails to protect you

Galaxy Brain: Being wardeced by major alliances from both sides of the dial-up at the same time

My IQ is so high that last night, God himself came into my bedroom to tenure his official surrender.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.