Jump to content
Roberts

[Vote]How we're doing awards this year

How would you like to see the Yearly Awards run this year?  

207 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

So since Kastor has bowed out, I'll run the awards.

I have two different ways we can do this and the choice is yours:

Option 1. We run the awards as typical of every other year. Nominations and voting open to the public.

Option 2. We run it with two delegates from each top 100 alliance with more than 5 members (to exclude banks).

 

I've opened this poll up to let the community decide which option they'd rather take. After it closes, I'll begin organizing either option.

Poll closes on Monday btw. Giving you guys the whole weekend to vote.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Leonard J Crabs said:

Democracy is good until it doesn't work out to our favor. We clearly need a republic and representatives to strip the voting rights of the majority.

Maybe there is a reason the United States isn’t a direct democracy. Also with only Inst voting option 2 in this poll among those who aren’t goons, still a pretty close poll. So of course you guys would want the higher representation in voting.

https://forum.politicsandwar.com/index.php?/topic/27331-is-the-definition-for-using-moderation-as-a-weapon-too-narrow/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Noctis Anarch Caelum said:

I actually like the 2 delegate thing from the top 100 with at least 5 members. Maybe the rewards would mean something for once. 

And now the kiss of death to Option 2.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Noctis Anarch Caelum said:

Maybe there is a reason the United States isn’t a direct democracy. Also with only Inst voting option 2 in this poll among those who aren’t goons, still a pretty close poll. So of course you guys would want the higher representation in voting.

https://forum.politicsandwar.com/index.php?/topic/27331-is-the-definition-for-using-moderation-as-a-weapon-too-narrow/

So, its been direct democracy every year. Goons and GPWC become a thing, now there's a push to disenfranchise the majority of votes.

Please, tell me how concerned you are for the rights of the community.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Comrade Marx said:

And now the kiss of death to Option 2.

Think you guys were already aware you’d have far more than 2 votes if option 1 wins & are voting that anyways.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Noctis Anarch Caelum said:

Maybe there is a reason the United States isn’t a direct democracy.

There is a reason and I know what it is. Do you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Noctis Anarch Caelum said:

I actually like the 2 delegate thing from the top 100 with at least 5 members. Maybe the rewards would mean something for once. 

Brb, making a dozen micros to flood the vote and game that system jsut to spite it

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Beet said:

718e66313fff726e6f813429a52867af.png

 

For historical posterity this is the current status of this "pretty close poll" as of the time he wrote this post.

The poll I linked to is, this one isn’t & doubt it will pass. People can change their votes though, so who knows. I don’t care about the rewards much either way though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Noctis Anarch Caelum said:

The poll I linked to is, this one isn’t & doubt it will pass. People can change their votes though, so who knows. I don’t care about the rewards much either way though.

You sure are concerned about disenfranchising the majority though.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Leonard J Crabs said:

You sure are concerned about disenfranchising the majority though.

I thought it was an interesting idea is all, much better than the one Kastor had at least.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Prefontaine said:

Not at all. No Awards, never again.

With just a little organization, GPWC could decide the results of every reward if we don’t do the delegate thing. So wouldn’t surprise me if everyone loses motivation to do them if their ideas to give more alliances a chance fail.:P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Noctis Anarch Caelum said:

With just a little organization, GPWC could decide the results of every reward if we don’t do the delegate thing. So wouldn’t surprise me if everyone loses motivation to do them if their ideas to give more alliances a chance fail.:P

That wouldn't be different than how it has always been. Whichever group can muster the most people to vote controls the result.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Zoot said:

That wouldn't be different than how it has always been. Whichever group can muster the most people to vote controls the result.

There is nothing wrong with democracy and there never was. Democracy has always been the clearly best governmental system.

Edited by Leonard J Crabs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whass rong wit da herd mentalty?

Opshion 1 ackshally getz da populr peeple in2 da awrds. Don wan 2 bee liek da Oscars comitee leafing all da good MOOvees out.

Sinsteerly,

Da Cowz

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest PhantomThiefB
1 hour ago, Noctis Anarch Caelum said:

Maybe there is a reason the United States isn’t a direct democracy. Also with only Inst voting option 2 in this poll among those who aren’t goons, still a pretty close poll. So of course you guys would want the higher representation in voting.

https://forum.politicsandwar.com/index.php?/topic/27331-is-the-definition-for-using-moderation-as-a-weapon-too-narrow/

...

13 minutes ago, Cathy said:

Whass rong wit da herd mentalty?

Opshion 1 ackshally getz da populr peeple in2 da awrds. Don wan 2 bee liek da Oscars comitee leafing all da good MOOvees out.

Sinsteerly,

Da Cowz

You are my favorite GONOS member. 10/10 would read again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Prefontaine said:

Not at all. No Awards, never again.

Shut up shut up shut up! You will not keep my award from me!

dxE7ZzD.png

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, TheNG said:

Shut up shut up shut up! You will not keep my award from me!

dxE7ZzD.png

If the awards must happen, then you will win best leader, and never win worst. If it’s the only way to get you to join the no awards side of the forc—forum then so be it. Search your feelings. You know it to be true. 

  • Haha 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, Zoot said:

That wouldn't be different than how it has always been. Whichever group can muster the most people to vote controls the result.

Yeah, but maybe the possibility of one alliance controlling who wins every reward if they wanted to might make some who benefited from it previously reconsider whether the system will still work in their favor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Leonard J Crabs said:

There is nothing wrong with democracy and there never was. Democracy has always been the clearly best governmental system.

Rose is well aware ;)
Waiting for goons to become Democratic, it is the best governmental system after all.
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, BelgiumFury said:

Rose is well aware ;)
Waiting for goons to become Democratic, it is the best governmental system after all.
 

We are clearly a democratic peoples republic. We are acutely aware of democracy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Noctis Anarch Caelum said:

The poll I linked to is, this one isn’t & doubt it will pass. People can change their votes though, so who knows. I don’t care about the rewards much either way though.

ah yes, because alex will certainly change the rules of the game and forums because of a poll made by a person so mad about their bigot friend getting banned for being a bigot that they spam the reports forum with frivolous reports, clawing for any desperate means of pathetic revenge, who made said poll because their frivolous reports kept rightly getting smacked down.

Alex is not an idiot so im not sure why you'd expect this to be the case.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.