Filmore Posted November 26, 2019 Share Posted November 26, 2019 41 minutes ago, namukara said: That sounds reasonable. Now can you get to it so I don't have to pay through the nose for lead? Complain to Coalition B, specifically BK and NPO for holding things up. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
True King Posted November 26, 2019 Share Posted November 26, 2019 14 minutes ago, Filmore said: Complain to Coalition B, specifically BK and NPO for holding things up. I’n sure your Complaints & Grievances will mean a lot. 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Hodor Posted November 26, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted November 26, 2019 Partisan: Thoughtful proposal, neutral tone, open ended conclusion allowing room for dialogue. NPO: 1 25 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raphael Posted November 26, 2019 Share Posted November 26, 2019 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalmor Posted November 26, 2019 Share Posted November 26, 2019 56 minutes ago, Hodor said: Snio @Shadowthrone What about Partisan's post made you downvote it? What is there in that post to disapprove of? 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForgotPants Posted November 26, 2019 Share Posted November 26, 2019 7 minutes ago, Thalmor said: @Shadowthrone What about Partisan's post made you downvote it? What is there in that post to disapprove of? Umm cmon, you know what is wrong with Partisan's post. it's logical, reasonable and not at all vague. How can anyone not dislike that. Pfft. 3 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Filmore Posted November 26, 2019 Share Posted November 26, 2019 16 minutes ago, Thalmor said: @Shadowthrone What about Partisan's post made you downvote it? What is there in that post to disapprove of? A reasonable way to negotiate peace Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hodor Posted November 26, 2019 Share Posted November 26, 2019 (edited) 26 minutes ago, Filmore said: A reasonable way to negotiate peace You see I have a theory. Coalition B is not being malicious, they merely themselves only have the ability to consider one item at a time, it's why TKR is the only member of our coalition, why they cannot read Partisan's posts in their entirety, and why when they get it in their mind to downvote, by golly will they downvote! This is all just a grievous misunderstanding. Edited November 26, 2019 by Hodor 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
True King Posted November 27, 2019 Share Posted November 27, 2019 A perception from Coalition A was NPO attacking to defend BK would be such hard evidence IQ still existed, NPO would be finished if they did it next war. They thought it would be bad enough NPO wouldn't get involved. Although NPO doesn't need to give their perceived enemies a chance to build up with peace. I'll believe in peace when I actually see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Azaghul Posted November 27, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted November 27, 2019 I wish I was a fly on the wall seeing the governments of the other side trying to rationalize all of this to their memberships when their actions are so indefensible they aren't even trying to muster a defense in the public sphere. You know its bad when you can't even muddy the water. 5 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buorhann Posted November 27, 2019 Share Posted November 27, 2019 Just show all their members this thread. We’ll see how it’s rationalized. Warrior of Dio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfPCFQfOnLg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
True King Posted November 27, 2019 Share Posted November 27, 2019 6 minutes ago, Buorhann said: Just show all their members this thread. We’ll see how it’s rationalized. Winning is how it would be rationalized, what happens to everyone in Coalition B in the case of failure this war? Do they really have an alternative even if they don't know NPO/GOONS endgame here & suspicious of it? Is there any way for NPO to come back from this? I'm thinking those would be on their consideration list. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hassan Posted November 27, 2019 Share Posted November 27, 2019 Guys, slow down. Theres too many Roqbots to downvote and KERCHTOG members to upvote. take it easy. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefonteen Posted November 27, 2019 Author Share Posted November 27, 2019 On 11/26/2019 at 3:11 PM, Hodor said: Partisan: Thoughtful proposal, neutral tone, open ended conclusion allowing room for dialogue. NPO: Way to make them double down HODOR. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Hodor Posted November 27, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted November 27, 2019 20 minutes ago, Prefonteen said: Way to make them double down HODOR. 20 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post MonkeyDLegend Posted November 27, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted November 27, 2019 38 minutes ago, Prefonteen said: -snip- 16 Former Manager t$ and Director of R&D Former Director of Finance, Security in e$ Founder of The Prate Syndicate(test server) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr James Wilson Posted November 27, 2019 Share Posted November 27, 2019 On 11/26/2019 at 7:39 AM, True King said: I’n sure your Complaints & Grievances will mean a lot. Ha. I see what you did there. 2 The Volleyball Avanti Immortali ..one, two, Jimmy's coming for you... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan Posted November 27, 2019 Share Posted November 27, 2019 (edited) 8 hours ago, Buorhann said: Just show all their members this thread. We’ll see how it’s rationalized. I wasn't aware that they let their non-gov members read any news that they didn't produce themselves. Edited November 27, 2019 by Jordan 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kalev60 Posted November 27, 2019 Share Posted November 27, 2019 Why would we even need to read OWF after KT and few others declared perma.war few months ago and should total destruction of Colo B with their rhetorics ? 1 2 4 Charlie Chaplin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hodor Posted November 27, 2019 Share Posted November 27, 2019 48 minutes ago, kalev60 said: Why would we even need to read OWF after KT and few others declared perma.war few months ago and should total destruction of Colo B with their rhetorics ? Oh boy, man, you have some massive catching up to do, unless of course we've just come full circle and we're gonna bring up arguments that have already been addressed months ago? 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James II Posted November 27, 2019 Share Posted November 27, 2019 Why is IQ not letting us surrender? And why are they forcing their allies to fight under threat of hitting them? I know they've threatened at least three if they peaced out, and them hitting former coalition allies in itself is a threat. 1 "Most successful new AA" - Samuel Bates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hodor Posted November 27, 2019 Share Posted November 27, 2019 Here's some help, @kalev60, happy to provide more examples of multiple members of Coalition B saying that those comments do not reflect the consensus of the coalition. Just not sure it's worth doing more than a cursory search. On 8/9/2019 at 10:27 AM, Pasky Darkfire said: There were two main people who said anything along these lines of a death match. And there have been more than that, really, who have said they would be willing to come to the table and that it wasn't a death match. So this "rhetoric" isn't really a rhetoric from our side. It's rhetoric from individuals that you either just want to consider our main voice to keep your propaganda/shenanigans going, or you actually take Sketchy at his absolute word as the be all end all voice for the entire side. Which, quite frankly, is really funny to me. Because... ya know. I like Sketchy. But he's a bit of a Troll. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asierith Posted November 27, 2019 Share Posted November 27, 2019 36 minutes ago, James II said: Why is IQ not letting us surrender? And why are they forcing their allies to fight under threat of hitting them? I know they've threatened at least three if they peaced out, and them hitting former coalition allies in itself is a threat. It's been made perfectly clear to us that the reason we were hit was to send a message to those left within Coalition B 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Smith Posted November 27, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted November 27, 2019 It's funny that people like @Shadowthrone always try to make a big deal out of what the #2 of an alliance said meanwhile he is the #2 of NPO and has this in his signature: Apparently it only counts if it's our side doing it 2 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azaghul Posted November 27, 2019 Share Posted November 27, 2019 6 hours ago, Hodor said: This literally made me laugh out loud. Awesome. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts