Popular Post MinesomeMC Posted November 14, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted November 14, 2019 (edited) We the disappearance of Keno, I'd like to recommend a new game called Go Fish! It's a pn easy to learn game, that requires little skill and a lot of luck. You start off with 5 cards and the goal is to get the most pairs of cards before the deck runs out. You ask any opponent if they have a certain card, if they have that card they hand it over if not they tell you to "Go Fish!" In which you grab a card. If you run out of cards, you grab from the deck. If the deck runs out, the one with the most pairs wins. implemented in PnW Played with real players (or AI if sought for) 2 modes 1 - Party Mode no money is used on the game, it is used just to pass time (useful during server wait times) and connect with other players. Maximum of 5 players, winner gains a stat but no money or rss gains. 2 - Casino Mode All plays bet an amount (AI aswell if impemented) from their nations. The winner receives the amount betted. Maximum of 5 players, This is of course not the full llan, feel free to share your own ideas. However it would be fun to have a game we could player with each other that actually had interaction, ik development time would take a bit, but itd be worth it. Edited November 14, 2019 by MinesomeMC 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rygus Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 Support 100%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hassan Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 Agreed. Games could be a lot better if you can actually do something in them rather than just click a button and give all the work to the system. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusty Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 I'd do this, we could host gofish games and what not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comrade Boris Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 I am Comrade Boris, and I approve this message! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRM Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 Saw the title and figured it was a stupid thread. But read it after a bit. I fully support this idea. Please implement this! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zephyr Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 This sounds like collusion could give unscrupulous parties an advantage (though I'm not familiar with the game). I guess provided it's not for monetary benefit it could be fun, but if it's exploitable and does give monetary reward then I would object to that specific implementation of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MinesomeMC Posted November 14, 2019 Author Share Posted November 14, 2019 6 minutes ago, Zephyr said: This sounds like collusion could give unscrupulous parties an advantage (though I'm not familiar with the game). I guess provided it's not for monetary benefit it could be fun, but if it's exploitable and does give monetary reward then I would object to that specific implementation of it. In Casino Mode the game would cost all those involved with no bonus money made. Those who lost dont get there money back, and the winner gains that money. In Party mode it has no monetary gain or loss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zephyr Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 Just now, MinesomeMC said: In Casino Mode the game would cost all those involved with no bonus money made. Those who lost dont get there money back, and the winner gains that money. In Party mode it has no monetary gain or loss. If the winner's prize is greater than the sum cost incurred by colluders, and through collusion the chance of success is increased, then there is strong motive for collusion. To me it sounds like collusion may be beneficial in order to feed pairs to one colluder, win the game, and then divvy up the prize. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MinesomeMC Posted November 14, 2019 Author Share Posted November 14, 2019 23 minutes ago, Zephyr said: If the winner's prize is greater than the sum cost incurred by colluders, and through collusion the chance of success is increased, then there is strong motive for collusion. To me it sounds like collusion may be beneficial in order to feed pairs to one colluder, win the game, and then divvy up the prize. That makes sense, but the opponents not involved in the colludes still have a chance of winning. This allows there to be a risk. Also we can simply have a set amount that you bet, or a cap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zephyr Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 3 minutes ago, MinesomeMC said: That makes sense, but the opponents not involved in the colludes still have a chance of winning. This allows there to be a risk. Also we can simply have a set amount that you bet, or a cap. I guess it depends to what degree odds can be improved with collusion. However, if it's 4 colluders playing against 1 other (victim), I would imagine the odds of success are extremely high. Then the question is what kind of money are players betting? If it's low and insignificant enough, players may not bother colluding, but then too it removes interest that a monetary prize may entice. And the higher the prize, the more worthwhile collusion could be. Perhaps a solution would be to limit the prize payout to double the cost of participation -? It would eliminate any possible monetary gain from colluding with other players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MinesomeMC Posted November 14, 2019 Author Share Posted November 14, 2019 47 minutes ago, Zephyr said: I guess it depends to what degree odds can be improved with collusion. However, if it's 4 colluders playing against 1 other (victim), I would imagine the odds of success are extremely high. Then the question is what kind of money are players betting? If it's low and insignificant enough, players may not bother colluding, but then too it removes interest that a monetary prize may entice. And the higher the prize, the more worthwhile collusion could be. Perhaps a solution would be to limit the prize payout to double the cost of participation -? It would eliminate any possible monetary gain from colluding with other players. That could defiantly work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BowShot118 Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 Sounds great Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRM Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 11 hours ago, Zephyr said: This sounds like collusion could give unscrupulous parties an advantage (though I'm not familiar with the game). I guess provided it's not for monetary benefit it could be fun, but if it's exploitable and does give monetary reward then I would object to that specific implementation of it. Why not give the ability to invite certain nations to play? That way, only you and your friends can play in a certain group, etc. Ez fix. Not sure if someone already suggested it, I just skimmed the thread lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nokia Rokia Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 This is actually a pleasant idea I'm happy to see some new ideas rather than the upset comments happening in the Discord News servers 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MinesomeMC Posted November 14, 2019 Author Share Posted November 14, 2019 @Alex what do you think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRM Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 1 minute ago, MinesomeMC said: @Alex what do you think Alex: Water Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Alex Posted November 14, 2019 Administrators Share Posted November 14, 2019 Why waste my development time for something that you can already play? Here you go: https://cardgames.io/gofish/ You can set up your own side-hustle IG by offering an escrow service for players that want to bet against each other. You're welcome. 1 1 1 Is there a bug? Report It | Not understanding game mechanics? Ask About It | Got a good idea? Suggest ItForums Rules | Game Link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts