Jump to content
Prefonteen

[NPO Call to Arms]$yndicate RoH and Treaty Activation

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
44 minutes ago, Prefonteen said:

Fortwith, The $yndicate formally calls upon The New Pacific Order to honor its agreement and enter into a state of war against these aggressors

SnarlingSecondArrowana-max-1mb.gif

Edited by Theodosius
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Epi said:

Strange, i only smell salt coming from you.

Hey, guess what’s in the water of the Pacific Ocean?

  • Haha 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, bulbasaursucks said:

Hey, guess what’s in the water of the Pacific Ocean?

Fish perhaps? Or Nova remnants?

All I smell is blood, so when are the sharks coming for the kill? 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, Prefonteen said:

You're conducting your diplomacy in bad faith keshav. Please send Auctor.

Shit, I was found out

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ShadyAssassin said:

(You roq, edit the treaty post. Then cancel the treaty. Then feign innocence. Trust me it is the 420 IQ move with max salt)

Ngl this would be funny.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Prefonteen said:

The $yndicate formally points out that the following alliances are not directly allied to The Black Knights, and therefore have entered upon The $yndicate without semblance of just cause. Fortwith, The $yndicate formally calls upon The New Pacific Order to honor its agreement and enter into a state of war against these aggressors:

- United Purple Nations 

- Acadia

- Solar Knights

 

Pacta sunt servanda - every treaty in force is binding upon the parties to it and must be honored.
Sad NPO doesn't feel like acting honorably - and you are using an allies temporary weakness to attack their protectorates.
And sad that you're showing a 1000 Guinea babies the NPO way of treating allies and treaty obligations.
Many warned T$ for you - we were foolish enough to treaty you anyway. Have fun in IQ.

PS: to end on a positive note, congrats, about 1 in 4 active players of this game are now a member of Guinea/NPO.
And Guinea is still growing. Impressive recruitment drive.

Edited by Batavus
  • Like 1
  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, Rosey Song said:

I refuse any name that has "Soup" in it.  It gives certain alliances ego boosts.

Too late, Rosey. Alphabet Soup it is! 

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, HannaH said:

Too late, Rosey. Alphabet Soup it is! 

Oh great, Hannah found it, here we go.  :P 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Of course an alliance has to honor its treaties but we should try to be understanding of NPOs position as well.

As a compromise to make everyone happy I propose that NPO declares on both t$ and BK.

y84tt.jpg

 

 

 

Edited by Karl VII
  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, JordyHamsVII said:

Fish perhaps? Or Nova remnants?

All I smell is blood, so when are the sharks coming for the kill? 

 

I keep the sharks locked up in my basement. They cost $10mil apiece if you want to rent one. Credit card information or SS numbers accepted only.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. War dodgers exist. 

2. Coal B attacks them as all war dodgers should be. 

3. t$ defends war dodgers, an illegitimate move in my eyes. 

4. Coal B defends against t$ aggression and illegitimate counters. 

5. t$ calls in allies to help defend war dodgers. 

 

There's no feckin' way you're serious, t$. 

They're WAR DODGERS. 

WHAT DID YOU EXPECT WHEN YOU HARBORED THEM??? 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 6
  • Downvote 18

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Malleator said:

1. War dodgers exist. 

2. Coal B attacks them as all war dodgers should be. 

3. t$ defends war dodgers, an illegitimate move in my eyes. 

4. Coal B defends against t$ aggression and illegitimate counters. 

5. t$ calls in allies to help defend war dodgers. 

 

There's no feckin' way you're serious, t$. 

They're WAR DODGERS. 

WHAT DID YOU EXPECT WHEN YOU HARBORED THEM??? 

No coal b doesn't.  We proved that last night on North Point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Malleator said:

They're WAR DODGERS. 

WHAT DID YOU EXPECT WHEN YOU HARBORED THEM??? 

To use NPO as a shield like they have for every other transgression this war. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Malleator said:

1. War dodgers exist. 

2. Coal B attacks them as all war dodgers should be. 

3. t$ defends war dodgers, an illegitimate move in my eyes. 

4. Coal B defends against t$ aggression and illegitimate counters. 

5. t$ calls in allies to help defend war dodgers. 

 

There's no feckin' way you're serious, t$. 

They're WAR DODGERS. 

WHAT DID YOU EXPECT WHEN YOU HARBORED THEM??? 

Its funny how someone with 5bil net damages in this war is  conidered a war dogder...

I was just trying to give one of your guys in the coalition the chance to finally pass a war dogder

GUESS WHAT... its not gonna happen now 

Edited by Master
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Aragorn, son of Arathorn said:

To use NPO as a shield

Pot, The kettle called. IT SAYS YOUR BLACK.

  • Upvote 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Smith said:

>BK accusing others of hiding behind NPO

What a time to be alive :o 

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What about the people who joined col b to dodge the war?

Set a precedent, kick them or roll yourselves.

 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, Aragorn, son of Arathorn said:

To use NPO as a shield like they have for every other transgression this war. 

Well ..you would know best when it comes to using NPO for a shield. I guess you must be right.

Edited by Charles the Tyrant
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

T$ entered into the war by protecting ex-arrgh gov that we merely had a temporary ceasefire with pending speedy negotiations (that failed) and offensively hit bk.

TS has a non-chaining MDoAP with NPO, not a MDAP. Seems pretty clearcut to me, seems partiboi has lost his edge.

  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Malal said:

T$ entered into the war by protecting ex-arrgh gov that we merely had a temporary ceasefire with pending speedy negotiations (that failed) and offensively hit bk.

TS has a non-chaining MDoAP with NPO, not a MDAP. Seems pretty clearcut to me, seems partiboi has lost his edge.

And you say we need mental gymnastics to justify stuff...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Rosey Song said:

And you say we need mental gymnastics to justify stuff...

Let me turn this around, if ts signed a protectorate over UPN 2 days after ketog hit TC and then entered into the war by launching counters on guardian would you call that offensive or defensive?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Malal said:

Let me turn this around, if ts signed a protectorate over UPN 2 days after ketog hit TC and then entered into the war by launching counters on guardian would you call that offensive or defensive?

Quite easy, if there was a cease fire being broken during "peace talks", t$ would be defensively protecting it's sphere.

 

Hate to tell you, my opinions don't change depending who they apply to.  That's an IQ trait.

Edited by Rosey Song

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Rosey Song said:

Quite easy, if there was a cease fire being broken during "peace talks", t$ would be defensively protecting it's sphere.

No ceasefire was brokered, we merely stoped launching attacks temporarily out of our own generous hearts and I'm calling it a ceasefire because I'm to lazy to type all that. We were still 100% at war with these nations and informed TS of this fact on day 1 and that unless they surrendered promptly we would continue with the wars, as is our right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.