Prefonteen Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 8 minutes ago, Shiho Nishizumi said: You forgot NPO hitting their ally's prot in defence of a co belligerent they ostensibly have no ties with. I've been told npos hit on our protectorate was non chaining according to npo so it does not count or trigger our treaty with our protectorate. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Hodor Posted October 7, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 7, 2019 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: You've already proven your coalition can plan a war against each other and be friends. There is no spin on my side. Adrienne denied there ever being logs of plans to hit NPO post IQ. She has then slipped up in that post by saying she had planned how to tackle NPO/t$ in a hypothetical situation of NPO/t$ joining the war aggressively. The same type of hypothetical situation BK had planned for to roll chaos. Its all about the opportunity presenting itself to turn a hypothetical situation into a real situation. Sure you had coalition talks after that where you say you all decided not to act against NPO/t$ but the proof is there now that at least TKR via Adrienne had a plan of how to attack NPO/t$ if we were to enter. I suppose it hurts that you can't now run around saying it's bullshit that TKR had a plan to hit NPO/t$ post IQ. I'm gonna bite on this one because it really isn't even close to the same and you really should be able to see that: Scenario 1: Adrienne is asked how she would respond to being attacked by N$O. I imagine she said she'd fight? Cus what else do you do? If someone says, "Hey Hodor, how are you gonna react to Tiberius smacking you in the face?", And I respond with "I'll smack them back." You can't say I was plotting to smack you in the face. Or well, you can, but you'd be making no sense. Scenario 2: BK and co actively plot an aggressive war on CHAOS. So uh, that seems pretty clearly different? So either you're spinning harder than Charlotte, or we've just got a case of reading too quickly and comprehending too slowly. 1 4 7 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arawra Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 (edited) 18 hours ago, Roquentin said: The issue is you seem to only want me to do stuff that I see as screwing myself. For instance, with tS, the treaty has a non-chaining clause and they made a new sphere and had jettisoned us and signed new allies which provided comfort and succor to the enemy in addition to the previous succor rendered to our enemies when they peaced out and trashed us openly to them while we were getting threats of severe consequences and fighting. The people they've protected throughout have been enemy combatants and they put one into the gov of their cadet alliance. I hadn't read past this yet, so I don't know if anyone else said something similar but: If your goals were to ensure everyone endures significant damages then why wouldn't you want to take your ally's side and hit BK? There's still a lot of damage to be dealt to both your sphere, and BK's sphere. To me it seems like a missed opportunity not only to act upon your goals (like Ripper pointed out), but also to gain a lot of positive PR, and perhaps even prove to t$ that you two could still work together. I'm not FA, so maybe I missed the mark here, but that's what it looks like to me. Edited October 7, 2019 by REAP3R Quote Look up to the sky above~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 11 minutes ago, Hodor said: I'm gonna bite on this one because it really isn't even close to the same and you really should be able to see that: Scenario 1: Adrienne is asked how she would respond to being attacked by N$O. I imagine she said she'd fight? Cus what else do you do? If someone says, "Hey Hodor, how are you gonna react to Tiberius smacking you in the face?", And I respond with "I'll smack them back." You can't say I was plotting to smack you in the face. Or well, you can, but you'd be making no sense. Scenario 2: BK and co actively plot an aggressive war on CHAOS. So uh, that seems pretty clearly different? So either you're spinning harder than Charlotte, or we've just got a case of reading too quickly and comprehending too slowly. Seems a little suspect that you know she would delete the logs of it and deny they existed and then lie further by saying it was only pre-IQ logs. I mean you guys are quick enough to jump on anything Roq says or does and call him a liar etc when you have your own Queen pri copyn spinning a web of tales. A plot is only active if the opportunity is there to enact it. Otherwise it just becomes a hypothetical situation. You can plan and hope the dominos fall into place. Even so the BK plot never got past the hypothetical stage since you decided to pre-empt any opportunity. 3 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alyster Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 (edited) 20 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Seems a little suspect that you know she would delete the logs of it and deny they existed and then lie further by saying it was only pre-IQ logs. I mean you guys are quick enough to jump on anything Roq says or does and call him a liar etc when you have your own Queen pri copyn spinning a web of tales. A plot is only active if the opportunity is there to enact it. Otherwise it just becomes a hypothetical situation. You can plan and hope the dominos fall into place. Even so the BK plot never got past the hypothetical stage since you decided to pre-empt any opportunity. Do you know what's one of the definitions of insanity? Doing same thing over and over again expecting a different result. At first Roq tried to spin that story, claiming to have logs. Then Keshav had a go with same lies. Now you. Edited October 7, 2019 by alyster 4 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrienne Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: She has then slipped up in that post by saying she had planned how to tackle NPO/t$ in a hypothetical situation of NPO/t$ joining the war aggressively. That's not what I said at all but okay. Edit: This is what I was referencing wrt the conversation on t$/NPO; I posted the logs on it here ages back: https://forum.politicsandwar.com/index.php?/topic/25900-how-long-will-this-war-go-on-for/&do=findComment&comment=413207 Edited October 7, 2019 by Nizam Adrienne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hodor Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 (edited) 39 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Seems a little suspect that you know she would delete the logs of it and deny they existed and then lie further by saying it was only pre-IQ logs. I mean you guys are quick enough to jump on anything Roq says or does and call him a liar etc when you have your own Queen pri copyn spinning a web of tales. A plot is only active if the opportunity is there to enact it. Otherwise it just becomes a hypothetical situation. You can plan and hope the dominos fall into place. Even so the BK plot never got past the hypothetical stage since you decided to pre-empt any opportunity. If the first paragraph is true, sure it is suspect. I was commenting on your misinterpretation of what she said in this thread. I don't live in Adrienne's DMs sadly. Again I agree in principle, but that's not what you said. You said a hypothetical response to a specific prompt which included being the victim of an aggression was the same as a hypothetical, unprompted, aggressive war. Edited October 7, 2019 by Hodor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadowthrone Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 24 minutes ago, alyster said: At first Roq tried to spin that story, claiming to have logs. This is indeed true. I just don't see the need in posting it here and burning the person. Those logs played a huge role in convincing us of the necessity for hitting TKR at that start of all of this. 21 minutes ago, Nizam Adrienne said: That's not what I said at all but okay. Your cop-out was "this war." Thanks for playing. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefonteen Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 4 minutes ago, Shadowthrone said: This is indeed true. I just don't see the need in posting it here and burning the person. Those logs played a huge role in convincing us of the necessity for hitting TKR at that start of all of this. Your cop-out was "this war." Thanks for playing. Those logs would do a fabulous job convincing me that you genuinely havent tried to frick tS over. If they are indeed incriminating. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadowthrone Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 5 minutes ago, Prefonteen said: Those logs would do a fabulous job convincing me that you genuinely havent tried to frick tS over. If they are indeed incriminating. ? looking forward to share friend. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefonteen Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 Just now, Shadowthrone said: ? looking forward to share friend. Friend! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaceman Thrax Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 6 minutes ago, Prefonteen said: Those logs would do a fabulous job convincing me that you genuinely havent tried to frick tS over. If they are indeed incriminating. Or if they existed. If they show you, though, feel free to share. I've pretty consistently said (in fact, I first said it about a lie before they even came up with this one, and they came up with nothing that time too) that if TKR did say anything like that, they'd have a problem with CoS as well, since they'd also have lied to me. Seems a pretty good way to unseat the horrible TKR would-be hegemony that totally isn't fictional would be to just release the totally-not-fabricated CB for this war, but alas. Quote Slaughter the shits of the world. They poison the air you breathe. ~ William S. Burroughs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame of the Flawed Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 (edited) I can't be bothered to read everything here, and many of you know I avoid the OWF, but I did noticed this... On 10/4/2019 at 2:09 PM, Roquentin said: At the same time, tS feigned some interest in hitting KETOG which changed into rolling BK when Kayser disappeared. Since when can t$ actually hitting KETOG be rephrased as t$ merely feigning interest in hitting KETOG? That's some Olympic-level verbal gymnastics right there. I want to see those Chinese Olympians' birth certificates verifying their age. Edited October 7, 2019 by Flame of the Flawed double post 5 Quote a.k.a. Chaunce Chaunce - Today at 9:55 PM with the watermelons there isn't much space left I still have a lot of room to improve Manthrax Has Venomous Bite! - Today at 9:57 PM Hee hee. Room indeed. Sabriel - Today at 10:01 PM I feel like, if the other AAs knew how we act, they'd feel a deep sense of shame in knowing that they consistently get beat by us. when we talk about how many vegetables we can fit in Chaunce's ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 36 minutes ago, Prefonteen said: Those logs would do a fabulous job convincing me that you genuinely havent tried to frick tS over. If they are indeed incriminating. Here: SpacemanThrax06/17/2019 I think we should pre-empt NPO/t$ Adrienne06/17/2019 Not yet, BK man bad, Suppress BK, then swing and die under the Jackboot of Pacifica and the Wallet of t$ 4 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaceman Thrax Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Here: SpacemanThrax06/17/2019 I think we should pre-empt NPO/t$ Adrienne06/17/2019 Not yet, BK man bad, Suppress BK, then swing and die under the Jackboot of Pacifica and the Wallet of t$ Straight up I'm not ruling out your gov using that as a "legit" log later. Quote Slaughter the shits of the world. They poison the air you breathe. ~ William S. Burroughs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 1 minute ago, Spaceman Thrax said: Straight up I'm not ruling out your gov using that as a "legit" log later. The truth is always best in comedic form. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaceman Thrax Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 4 minutes ago, Tiberius said: The truth is always best in comedic form. Correct. Your alliance is a joke. : ) 3 2 Quote Slaughter the shits of the world. They poison the air you breathe. ~ William S. Burroughs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 2 minutes ago, Spaceman Thrax said: Correct. Your alliance is a joke. : ) 5 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrienne Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 2 hours ago, Shadowthrone said: This is indeed true. I just don't see the need in posting it here and burning the person. Those logs played a huge role in convincing us of the necessity for hitting TKR at that start of all of this. Your cop-out was "this war." Thanks for playing. So even my attempts to speak clearly will be spun? Neat. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ripper Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: The fact that you are crying also confirms that it's a bad joke. ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 53 minutes ago, Ripper said: The fact that you are crying also confirms that it's a bad joke. ? I would love to insult you and CoS but i'm afraid I won't do aswell as nature did. 3 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buorhann Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 6 hours ago, Spaceman Thrax said: So what else is new. Cheating anime nazis, you say? Great stuff, great stuff. Stay classy, IQ sphere. Missed you! It’s ok because AK is on their side. They’re now more worried about Baseball nerf. 1 1 Quote Warrior of Dio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfPCFQfOnLg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 8 minutes ago, Buorhann said: It’s ok because AK is on their side. They’re now more worried about Baseball nerf. I'm more worried you have an AkAk on your side. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Exar Kun -George Posted October 7, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 7, 2019 6 hours ago, Spaceman Thrax said: So what else is new. Cheating anime nazis, you say? Great stuff, great stuff. Stay classy, IQ sphere. Missed you! 32 minutes ago, Buorhann said: It’s ok because AK is on their side. Ok Ill bite here, We looked into this to the best of our ability. So while a government member had cheated the circumstances are completely different than the nova incident your referring to 1. In the nova incident there was the beliefe that they were cheating for a long period of time, where the AK incident indicated to a sole incident 2. The Nova incident included multiple gov members where the AK incident was one sole gov member 3. With the nova incident, the "damage had been done" with millions of resources sold and cities bought. Where in the AK incident the money had not been spent and was recovered by Alex So while im not condoning cheating, there is no evidence to prove AK gov remaining had any idea this was being exploited. Therefore action really was not needed, BK does not condone cheating by anyone, allies or not 8 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zei-Sakura Alsainn Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 8 minutes ago, George (James T Kirk) said: Ok Ill bite here, We looked into this to the best of our ability. So while a government member had cheated the circumstances are completely different than the nova incident your referring to 1. In the nova incident there was the beliefe that they were cheating for a long period of time, where the AK incident indicated to a sole incident 2. The Nova incident included multiple gov members where the AK incident was one sole gov member 3. With the nova incident, the "damage had been done" with millions of resources sold and cities bought. Where in the AK incident the money had not been spent and was recovered by Alex So while im not condoning cheating, there is no evidence to prove AK gov remaining had any idea this was being exploited. Therefore action really was not needed, BK does not condone cheating by anyone, allies or not Aside from the fact that's it's known AKs leader learned of the ability to do this a day before said line gov member started it. And that's from someone else in your Coalition saying they told them. ? I, do not buy it. Not with the big heads they have. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.