Jump to content

Of Pickaxes and Hammers - A Tale of Surrender


Evernt
 Share

Recommended Posts

This is some bright formatting 

  • "We ruin the countries we govern and the people in our care. We slaughter our enemies and sacrifice all our allies. We’ll keep killing till there’s nothing left but to destroy ourselves. It will never be enough"
  • "You'll never win"
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Frawley
6 minutes ago, Evernt said:

Complete and unconditional surrender
-No Further Terms at this time.

You realise the definition of unconditional surrender means they can impose whatever terms they want after the fact. Like asking for your in game savings etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sri Lanka 001 said:

damn buddy don't need to hate like this, be respectful

Ain't any hate. Genuine bewilderment. I've heard of House Arryn (although I wish I hadn't) but I've never heard of TSL or TCM. I was surprised by the fact that they existed and I was also surprised by the fact that House Arryn somehow beat someone.

1 minute ago, Frawley said:

You realise the definition of unconditional surrender means they can impose whatever terms they want after the fact. Like asking for your in game savings etc. 

Frawley, TSL is #78 and TCM is #60. Do they really have savings that are worth demanding?

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frawley said:

You realise the definition of unconditional surrender means they can impose whatever terms they want after the fact. Like asking for your in game savings etc. 

ya but they actually said it will have no terms we added some stuff to add flare while the original terms are a vague surrender 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tarroc said:

Ain't any hate. Genuine bewilderment. I've heard of House Arryn (although I wish I hadn't) but I've never heard of TSL or TCM. I was surprised by the fact that they existed and I was also surprised by the fact that House Arryn somehow beat someone.

Beat? Beat who?

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tarroc said:

Ain't any hate. Genuine bewilderment. I've heard of House Arryn (although I wish I hadn't) but I've never heard of TSL or TCM. I was surprised by the fact that they existed and I was also surprised by the fact that House Arryn somehow beat someone.

Frawley, TSL is #78 and TCM is #60. Do they really have savings that are worth demanding?

also House Arryn didnt beat anyone we got white peace aka mutual acceptance of man this war is pointless why are we wasting time talking to eachother 

lets leave that to alliances who are older with inflated egos 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good luck rebuilding!

5 minutes ago, Tarroc said:

When did you join the war?

I believe they joined the war when BK hit House Arryn. House Arryn was hitting The Coal Mines, and The Socialist League joined in their defense. When BK hit them, we recognized TCM and TSL as belligerents, since they were engaged in war against HA. I could be mistaken, please correct me if I’m wrong, but this is my impression of the situation.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Frawley said:

You realise the definition of unconditional surrender means they can impose whatever terms they want after the fact. Like asking for your in game savings etc. 

Pretty sure what was meant was that there would be no terms, not that anyone from our coalition would try and add terms after the fact.

Good luck, TCM and TSL, enjoy peace :)

Edited by Nizam Adrienne
  • Like 3
  • Upvote 3

BrOQBND.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Frawley
4 minutes ago, Tarroc said:

Frawley, TSL is #78 and TCM is #60. Do they really have savings that are worth demanding?

Well if you listened to Bootytime last week, or perhaps it was Gorges show the answer is yes, very much so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frawley said:

Well if you listened to Bootytime last week, or perhaps it was Gorges show the answer is yes, very much so.

Shhhhh they don't need to know that. It's their fault if they dont listen. 

Edited by Fairymoon
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Frawley
3 minutes ago, Nizam Adrienne said:

Pretty sure what was meant was that there would be no terms, not that anyone from our coalition would try and add terms after the fact.

That's not unconditional surrender then is it ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.