Sir Scarfalot Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 1 hour ago, A Boy Named Crow said: Hey, can we stuff the peace term arguments back into the "Global Peace Term" thread? That thread needs to hit 40 pages. It's silly, neither side will admit to stalling, so you both are going to end up accusing each other of the act. In reality, both sides were stalling, what with the stop-and-go peace negotiations and a peace negotiation that wasn't actually a "negotiation" since the terms were unconditional. I mean, if the point is to go roll IQ post-war, I'm saving up banked cash for that, but I'm wondering how drunk I'll have to be to jump in the next go-around. And yet the terms were modified at some point, so apparently they were negotiable. If only a little. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lu Xun Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 At the mid stages, the terms were slightly departed from unconditional surrender. Quote . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zei-Sakura Alsainn Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 5 hours ago, Sir Scarfalot said: And yet the terms were modified at some point, so apparently they were negotiable. If only a little. Only if you assume they were changed because of any actual negotiations. Change for any other reason destroys this line of logic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisyphus Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 7 hours ago, A Boy Named Crow said: I'm wondering how drunk I'll have to be to jump in the next go-around. Very drunk. It isn't a war if you know how well you're doing before you wake up the next day. Quote One must imagine Sisyphus happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.