Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Rimski

The Vanguard and YEET

Recommended Posts

The response to the turnaround of the Northern European state against the Internationale is the establishment of YEET and the introduction of the Vanguard in the Eastern waters of the Internationale. Partisan actions in coastal provinces of some European state has resulted in Internationale intervention and protection. The new 'lands' are considered as states inside the Internationale but they are more of a pivot between the Internationale's home islands and Europe. New workers are now dependent from foreign countries on the Internationale's Industry which is massively expanding. Now with more points from which trade and culture can flow more into Europe and slowly assimilate the Western population. 

The Vanguard's objective is protection of the workers in a constant struggle with the dominant upper class, as well as a local defense force consisting of trained personnel from the Internationale and local volunteers. They train, defend and arm the proletariat so they can defend their homes, families and people. 

YEET - Yank Eastern Engineering Track, a unit consisted of engineers whom research the geography of new lands and making up plans for Industrialization, building and defensive military operations and consutrction. Their HQ is in Hague, Netherlands and are setting up plans for expansion of harbours, for regular trade and civilian use, and the construction of three major ports for military construction and use. A mad plan to construct a canal from Hamburg to Lübeck has been also sent to HQ but never been proceeded to Corbyngrad. 

A planned railway going from Caen to Hamburg is awaiting approval from other European nations and will undergo construction once they agree on the plan and finances.

In the Far East, Russia the Internationale armies and personnel are leaving and now on a large travel back to the Home islands while some are assigned in the rest of Japan. The area has went through large industralization and the population now can go independently running their affairs. 

Viva la Revolucion!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While the USNE supports industrialisation, equality and workers rights, we are condemning this action. Immediately after the report on British subversion and funding of terrorism went public, you've established a territory on our border. What's more is that you are militarising it. All this has taken place without consulting or warning us, and so we now feel threatened. At best, this is a clumsy diplomatic move, to push for your socialist ideals without considering all parties involved. At worst, it is a threat to us, to cow us into silence about British subversion. Well, we will not be cowed. 

Britain initiated these tensions last year, when they covertly supplied weapons to radicals, leading to a terrorist attack which could have killed many more. The moment we find out that they were the party responsible, they annex and militarise our border territories. It is clear who the aggressor is. We call on all nations to back us up in this tense situation. To stand with us is to stand for civil rights, progress, cooperation and equality. Once again, we will not be cowed into silence. We will stand, defiant in the face of aggression. Do not undertake further acts of aggression.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"I think that your claim is invalid. You claim that workers that want to break free from the shackles of tyranny and oppression are considered terrorist? Next, I don't think that we should tell you where we 'establish territories' and where is the militarisation? You mean the army that is there to protect? The Vanguard that helps the workers fight back for themselves with no fear of being crushed? Why is it so wrong to 'claim' lands in Europe, you expand into the Baltic and nobody says anything. We have already mentioned on the previous talks that you are claiming we are the ones that supported your internal enemies, while not thinking that it can be a plot made by a 3rd independent party. And as the last say, Civil rights, progress, cooperation and equality? When did we speak against civil rights, when were we anything besides progressive and cooperative and seriously bud, claiming that we are not equal with our ideal. I say again, you spew the same things, claiming that we are nothing but a heaven for terrorist support and with no basic human rights and that is aggressive for your absurd claim? 

If you are keen on knowing, the reason for the expansion there is to have a second canal going from the North Sea to the Baltic which is not in your control and it is planned to be a free travel zone for any state without paying a fee. Giving people jobs is an act of terrorism, militarism and aggression?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Rimski said:

I think that your claim is invalid. You claim that workers that want to break free from the shackles of tyranny and oppression are considered terrorist?

You are deliberately obfuscating what we have said. We never said workers are terrorists. We said that some of the people in the USNE, who you supplied with guns last year, committed acts of terrorism. I do not think you are stupid, so this is clearly a case of obfuscation.

3 hours ago, Rimski said:

Next, I don't think that we should tell you where we 'establish territories' and where is the militarisation? You mean the army that is there to protect? The Vanguard that helps the workers fight back for themselves with no fear of being crushed?

We do not believe you are fully sincere in your devotion to high-minded communist ideals, in this case at least. Your timing betrays your true intentions. The moment a report into your subversion of the USNE's democracy goes public, you annex and militarise territory far from the home islands but right next to us. You put effort into annexing northern Germany, rather than just gaining land close to home. You claim that a defensive force is not militarisation, but you omit the fact that a defensive force can soon become an offensive one.

3 hours ago, Rimski said:

Why is it so wrong to 'claim' lands in Europe, you expand into the Baltic and nobody says anything.

Our agreement with Poland-Lithuania was a bilateral decision that threatened nobody. There is no comparison. What you are doing is muddying the waters, a classic propaganda tactic of subversive regimes.

3 hours ago, Rimski said:

We have already mentioned on the previous talks that you are claiming we are the ones that supported your internal enemies, while not thinking that it can be a plot made by a 3rd independent party.

Our initial hypothesis was that it was a plot made by a third party, which you would know if you actually read the report before commenting. But after evidence piled up which contradicted our initial view, we were forced to accept the conclusion the evidence pointed to. Our investigation was meticulously and scientifically conducted for over 500 days, and we had no initial reason to be biased against you.

3 hours ago, Rimski said:

And as the last say, Civil rights, progress, cooperation and equality? When did we speak against civil rights, when were we anything besides progressive and cooperative and seriously bud, claiming that we are not equal with our ideal. I say again, you spew the same things, claiming that we are nothing but a heaven for terrorist support and with no basic human rights and that is aggressive for your absurd claim?

You have gulags in Scotland, and follow an ideology which effectively died last century. You have been totally uncooperative in the past year, beginning with arming militants in our nation. We never said you were a terror haven, merely that you fund them in other states.

3 hours ago, Rimski said:

If you are keen on knowing, the reason for the expansion there is to have a second canal going from the North Sea to the Baltic which is not in your control and it is planned to be a free travel zone for any state without paying a fee. Giving people jobs is an act of terrorism, militarism and aggression?

Once again, we believe you have ulterior motives, especially as what you are proposing is what we are already effectively doing. Your final sentence is another obfuscation. We never said such a thing. We said that what you are doing alongside it is aggression.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Loudspeakers were directed at the border. They would play music, interesting podcasts, and occasionally propaganda. The propaganda did not take an aggressive tone, and just warned people to be wary of those promising quick and radical solutions to complex issues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, Northern Germany is close and we have reason to be there, defending the proletariat and giving them a brighter future with employment and a home. And Germany is very close to us, the issue is you being there, we have always pushed for expansion of the industrial force in all of Europe and everywhere for the people to have jobs and do a lot of good for their state even if it is not ours.But oh is this not progressive? 

Secondly, we do not annex lands, we liberate them. Japan, Russia and China, we were there to liberate them, give the people employment and an enjoyable life, then we left. Russia for now, China is still there because it is in a civil war and we are protecting the original party.

Thirdly, that is from your own perspective, we see your plans with Poland Lithuania as a plot to expand your might in the Baltic area, and our acts are to be progessive, to protect the working people from destruction, ensure they have work with which they can afford a living and not be treated like an animal with standards below the minimum, with many dangers and risks for their basic health and even life, not to mention that they will be payed nothing and they are on the verge of existence. 

Gulags, yes we have them, but their death rate isn't high. The deaths that happen in them are because of radical nationalism and they are dealt with quickly. While the other people live, eat and work there. They accumulate wealth with whom after they leave the 'Gulag' they can start a new life with no criminal background. The 'downfall' of the Eastern Bloc isn't classified as a fall of communism, and the supposed death of an ideal has nothing in this matter. And if it is truly dead why are there still Antifa members preventing nationalism to rise, preventing or slowing down a nationalist mobilisation, why are there people requesting for our help to liberate them. China, we have sent many weapons there, we have trained them, we have rebuilt their industry, so they can repel the aggressive  Rok invader. Russia, it would have been a matter of time before Rok took it and sent a reign of terror, but instead, we protected them and made that area a workers paradise. Japan, apparently the elimination of the people whom brought genocide and fear into East Asia is a bad thing. Forming the Commonwealth and bringing a large union together back from the grave. Talks and cooperative endavours by us and Masrani corporation for space, Trade talks with Britannia, the trip to Takoshin empire, a friendly union with Mog[Corp]. Hm, seems like we aren't cooperative.

Which states terrorist were funded, the defenders in China? The people fighting off tyrants? And because we see you are not giving up from your claim that we funded the terrorists in your country. Firstly, what is the specific evidence for that which would make us be the one supporting them and not a 3rd party, and what do you even request from our nation to do in this situation, cause you have only held an aggressive stance and blamed us for everything. 

The reason we are there is so people aren't dependent on you, with the canal at least, while with us we give people a choice. You have not cared for a conflict practically "on your border" which was based on workers and civil rights. The people didnt want to be oppressed and when we come in, help those souls, and build up their nation then we are apparently aggressive. You just put out that we are there because of your supposed leak and we are the big bad aggressive wolf so you can have support in a conflict against us.

----

At the border, guards have walked up to the people controling those loudspeakers and requested that they were dismantled and moved. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

We're going to ignore your response, as it either puts forward ideological statements or intentionally sidesteps the crux of the issue. We will no longer be communicating publicly with your nation, until you wish to negotiate the cessation of your aggression.

 

The request was refused, on the grounds that what goes on within the USNE should none of Britain's concern, especially for something as mundane as speakers whose main content is music.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Loudspeakers would be brought from the Home islands to the border and irritating music would be played such as "what does the fox say", and yes I do hate myself, as well as techno and bass boosted Communist music. 2000 More soldiers would be placed along the border on constant watch of a USNE assault or illegal crossing. Drones would constantly overlook the border and artillery would be placed to repel any assault if it came to that. Aircraft and anti air would be ready to counterattack any preemptive strike by the USNE. The Missile Units have been alerted to watch out for any aerial or missile strike aimed against the Internationale and to be ready to repel it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

USNE personnel enjoy the music because of the meme value. They respond by playing back the Nicolas Maduro version of Despacito, also for meme value, and to make fun of the British Internationale.

Drones would patrol over the skies of Denmark and the North Sea. Anti-missile interceptors were deployed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While the petty squabbling continues, it was important to long term objectives to reinforce the company's name position and add an additional two carrier groups to the north Atlantic with one of those originally designated for wargames to instead sail towards the north sea and towards the baltics to make freedom of navigation rounds in the area.

Edited by Mogar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A rapid response team of 5000 soldiers was deployed in Denmark, but beyond viewing distance from the border so as not to seem aggressive, as it was a defensive measure. Anti-tank fortifications were placed on the border.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A message was sent to MoG[Corp], assuring the corporation that the USNE would not take actions which would undermine freedom in the seas or international trade. The carrier group was offered the possibility of refuelling in USNE ports.

Separately, the USNE requested a UN assembly to negotiate a de-escalation of tensions in the North Sea and USNE border zone.

Edited by Reuben Cheuk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even though there were USNE aggression and tension, the construction of the Hamburg canal has been started with locals being offered a job in the construction of it, with all the hardware and material being brought from the Internationale. Jobs were offered for guarding, maintaining and furthermore as well. 10000 construction workers will participate in the building and the maximal estimate of the construction was 2 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.