Jump to content

Global War Peace Terms - Discussion


Ripper
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 12/20/2018 at 6:08 PM, Prefontaine said:

SRD is also too proud (see: incompetent) to accept the terms. 

Sorry I forgot being dynamic is dictating to defending alliances how they can run.  Because dictating tons of terms on people is also how the world becomes more dynamic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sweeeeet Ronny D said:

Sorry I forgot being dynamic is dictating to defending alliances how they can run.  Because dictating tons of terms on people is also how the world becomes more dynamic.

Honestly, considering the effect on relations such terms have, it does.

Politics is far less interesting when everyone plays with kid gloves.

When will it be learned that IC drama is good? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/22/2018 at 11:19 AM, Sweeeeet Ronny D said:

Sorry I forgot being dynamic is dictating to defending alliances how they can run.  Because dictating tons of terms on people is also how the world becomes more dynamic.

We can wait.

GICjEwp.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheRebelMan said:

Honestly. 

That would be so legit. 

But that would let TKR sphere recover. 

Lmao

I'd be okay with that, just to have something to hit.

  • Upvote 1

Le1AjCa.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, TheRebelMan said:

Honestly. 

That would be so legit. 

But that would let TKR sphere recover. 

Lmao

 

12 minutes ago, Ripper said:

The idea got shot-down. :(

 

giphy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Madden8021 said:

Now that is understandable to some alliances not showing up to Peace Talks. I'm not giving out Alliance names but they're too stubborn to quit at all. Let's go with Mr. Stubborn since this war...... IS CHEAP!!!

Well according to their own internal surveys over half their members find peace demands reasonable. Government ego is what’s holding peace back. 

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, The Mad Titan said:

Well according to their own internal surveys over half their members find peace demands reasonable. Government ego is what’s holding peace back. 

tbf when the alliance is to inactive to vote other than their own gov.. can they rely on the results? 

Edited by Pestilence
  • Upvote 1

0b3897cd640f95254329f7a2d45d8c77b1c120e.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Radoje said:


 

Capture_2018-12-23-18-45-49.png

TBF I was referencing TCW not TKR, but what's the difference? I mean only 18 people are active enough to vote but not my problem.

Also you have 82 active members, if you have 50 that will stick it out so be it lmao. I will enjoy getting you there.

Edited by The Mad Titan
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Sir Scarfalot said:

At this point they've taken all the damage they possibly can; anyone that's still there now is probably going to stay even if the war drags on for another full year. Also getting an even split on the yes/no doesn't prove your point at all; if anything it shows that their membership actually are willing to stick it out. I'm just as surprised as you are, tbh.

So goes the party line. They continue to lose members though so the no damage argument is pretty hollow. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.