Jump to content

Recognition of Hostilities


Prezyan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Prezyan said:

Resplendent Inc hereby recognizes hostilities with the The Commonwealth, but since they're owned by TKR, them too.

latest?cb=20161209113307

unknown.png

Despite respectfully asking for a nuclear bounty, we have for too long been disrespected by only receiving a mere attrition bounty. This horrible disregard for human respect cannot go unpunished.

unknown.png?width=960&height=67

 

Only once Felkey steps down, pays us 50,000,000, or Smith asks nicely, will we agree to peace.

Do they even have anyone within your range ?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Pheonix said:

I heard there was a secret chord

that David played and it pleased the Lord

  • Upvote 2

2016/04/26 –

mIjXiMx.gif

Unreleased Bad Company advert, circa 2018

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Madden8021 said:

I looked into 3 Resplendent Three and the MDP Eastasia. They're too low for any bigger nations but new players that joined, left the game and became inactive, or for other reasons. Are these two alliances that Dense? Idk if they can reach the bigger nations and will be asking for peace either way.

Eastasia's alliance link: https://politicsandwar.com/alliance/id=5047 and their scores, Normal Score = 5,057.71, their average score is pretty weak with 361.27

 

3 Resplendent Three's Alliance link: https://politicsandwar.com/alliance/id=5075 and here's their scores, Normal Score = 473.28, even the average score with 236.64. 

 

Like seriously, are they both *That Dense* to fight any big nations with bigger scores? Answer = Nope. They'll be fighting new and starting players to the seems.

 

Do your own look into this everyone and just send your new/starting players after them and then you'll see why that they're just too dense to think of such hostilities.

To be fair, that is exactly how one *should* fight against top alliances: Bite their ankles from below striking range. Surgical strikes against weak links and inactive individuals. By that metric, they've not actually made that much of a mistake at all.

Their mistake is trying to pull this while being almost completely incapable of acting upon any targets of opportunity as it is. You really need more than a handful of tiny nations to fight like that...

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Qin San Shi said:

As a totally real and definitely not backstabbing ally of 3 Obelisk 3, we invoke the defense clause of our MDP and declare war on TKR

score.png

They didn't even know what hit em

That score drop tho. That's hawt

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.