Jump to content

Shifty News Network LLC-Leaky Faucets


丂ħ̧i̧₣ɫ̵γ͘ ̶™
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Smith said:

No offense taken! I appreciate you talking in good faith like that. I do think it's a lose-lose situation for us though. For everyone who thinks defending ourselves makes us look guilty there will be another guy going "look they won't even defend themselves they must be guilty." Even if the concerned parties believe you after talking with them that's still a lot of other people who may think differently of you now.

And it's also possible the concerned parties wouldn't bother messaging us first if they believe the logs to be true. The burden is on us since we're the ones in the logs imo

 

No worries, and fair enough. It's probably all subjective anyways. I'd handle it by not giving it public importance, but I get the possible implications that doing so might have. Then again, and regardless of the importance public opinion might have, the decision makers are the ones who end up making the calls. I highly doubt anyone would make rash decisions based on logs without at least talking to the other party. But I do see where you're coming from.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Insert Name Here said:

 

No worries, and fair enough. It's probably all subjective anyways. I'd handle it by not giving it public importance, but I get the possible implications that doing so might have. Then again, and regardless of the importance public opinion might have, the decision makers are the ones who end up making the calls. I highly doubt anyone would make rash decisions based on logs without at least talking to the other party. But I do see where you're coming from.

Yeah it's hard to know for sure either way sometimes. But regardless I'm glad we did have an actual reasonable discussion on the owf ?

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

C0r3Fye.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Smith said:

Yeah it's hard to know for sure either way sometimes. But regardless I'm glad we did have an actual reasonable discussion on the owf ?

 

I was thinking the same, but I'm hoping for someone else to trigger a more heated discussion because civility is no fun. :D 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Smith said:

Yeah it's hard to know for sure either way sometimes. But regardless I'm glad we did have an actual reasonable discussion on the owf ?

You would be surprised at how reasonable me and my murderous band of merry idiots can be. 

scSqPGJ.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Prefontaine said:

You would be surprised at how reasonable me and my murderous band of merry idiots can be. 

 

Doesn't go too well with the alliance theme, but oh well...

Khorne for the Khorne Flakes!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As the strongest and most feared bloc in easy mode.....if they were planning or doing anything at all, they would not hide it or be deceptive at all. Why do they have to? They the best and never lose wars. They always outnumber the enemy 5 to 1 and nobody has the balls or planning to come close. So quit the slander campaign against easy mode and just accept the fate of orbis is controlled by something bigger than the rest of us.

 

Bow down plebs. Even if shifty was not making this up......what are you gonna do about it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, ⚔ϟħ̧i̧₣ɫ̵γ͘ ̶™⚔ said:

Damn they found out I'm Mitsuru's evil twin.

I think this reaction to Adrienne calling you out shows that she's hit the nail on the head.

I think Durmij was quite right when he said that you need help.

@Sketchy Obviously one doesn't need context here. Unless you want to insist that these logs are real in which case be my guest.

5 hours ago, Buorhann said:

And yet none of this was addressed by TKR.

No need to address comments based on fake logs. ?‍♂️

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Micchan said:

Don't listen to what they have said, I'm here to confirm what Adrienne said in those logs

It's true, half of them can't fight properly

No one was doubting the validity of the logs so no worries.

Chief Financial Officer of The Syndicate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Mitsuru said:

I think this reaction to Adrienne calling you out shows that she's hit the nail on the head.

I think Durmij was quite right when he said that you need help.

@Sketchy Obviously one doesn't need context here. Unless you want to insist that these logs are real in which case be my guest.

No need to address comments based on fake logs. ?‍♂️

This logic is utterly nonsensical and pathetic.
"You made a joke, therefore what my leader said is true, also what some ridiculous SJW nutcase said is also true."

It wasn't even some sweepingly offensive joke. Hell, you're still the good twin.

Really? No need to respond to comments about it? Is... that why your government and leader have posted numerous respones to the posting and also commenters on said logs, but just not the ones Buor mentioned?

This is not how logic functions, and you should know better. That doesn't mean call yourself (as a part of gov) guilty, it means stop saying something which everyone can clearly see is not reality. Why, yes, infact, there must be some need to respond to them - because they did.
Unless you didn't the thread at all, but even then, the shifty comment you lost all sense of rationality over was infact responding to your leader. The only excuse here is gross incompetence, or i suppose a problem with shifty in particular. At least i could understand the 2nd one.

I haven't even said whether i think you're guilty or not yet. I don't actually care. Don't let shifty make yah slip up too much though. :P

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since @Buorhann is either being willfully ignorant or is actually partially illiterate in some capacity, let me break this down to him in simple terms:

An easily-faked, unverified screenshot is posted showing someone allegedly saying something, and even in said screenshot there's no context to the conversation.  As a response to this, people go "wow I thought TKR wasn't going to hold grudges".  When the leader of TKR came on and said the logs were fake and even brought their own fake screenshot to prove how easy it is to fake these things, that is the response to those comments.  The entire reason those comments exist is because of a fake conversation, so if the conversation never existed, then there is nothing to address.  You're asking us to address literally made-up concerns.

We have gone to BK and told them we want to mend bridges, and have started to do so.  In response to this, Shifty made this garbage up to try and ruin this attempt.

The only thing that needs addressing is why you all bit the bait so hard.

120209800_meirl2.png.0a9b257b4d3e0c1ac6d6b8be8184cba7.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sargun said:

Since @Buorhann is either being willfully ignorant or is actually partially illiterate in some capacity, let me break this down to him in simple terms:

An easily-faked, unverified screenshot is posted showing someone allegedly saying something, and even in said screenshot there's no context to the conversation.  As a response to this, people go "wow I thought TKR wasn't going to hold grudges".  When the leader of TKR came on and said the logs were fake and even brought their own fake screenshot to prove how easy it is to fake these things, that is the response to those comments.  The entire reason those comments exist is because of a fake conversation, so if the conversation never existed, then there is nothing to address.  You're asking us to address literally made-up concerns.

We have gone to BK and told them we want to mend bridges, and have started to do so.  In response to this, Shifty made this garbage up to try and ruin this attempt.

The only thing that needs addressing is why you all bit the bait so hard.

Which has also already been explained in this thread.

Point 1: An alliance plotting against historical enemies? NEVER, WHAAAAAT? Yeah thats obviously believable. 
Point 2: They don't like you, so the fact that point 1 is extremely believable even if the logs are fake means you're guilty either way. Something Smith managed to understand, not sure why you've missed it.
Point 3: more of them not liking you, except now related to making yourselves guilty by saying your innocent.

See, this is why i said i don't care if you're guilty. It doesn't matter. Smith figured out why pages ago. Cause you're fricked either way. You ask why people bit the bait, what you should be wondering is how many more people did but haven't made it obvious.

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Sargun said:

Since @Buorhann is either being willfully ignorant or is actually partially illiterate in some capacity, let me break this down to him in simple terms:

An easily-faked, unverified screenshot is posted showing someone allegedly saying something, and even in said screenshot there's no context to the conversation.  As a response to this, people go "wow I thought TKR wasn't going to hold grudges".  When the leader of TKR came on and said the logs were fake and even brought their own fake screenshot to prove how easy it is to fake these things, that is the response to those comments.  The entire reason those comments exist is because of a fake conversation, so if the conversation never existed, then there is nothing to address.  You're asking us to address literally made-up concerns.

We have gone to BK and told them we want to mend bridges, and have started to do so.  In response to this, Shifty made this garbage up to try and ruin this attempt.

The only thing that needs addressing is why you all bit the bait so hard.

Neither you or Mitsuru caught exactly what I was referencing, but keep going.  This is great.

 

(Psst.  Read the words previously quoted carefully.  It’s there.)

Edited by Buorhann
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.