Jump to content

Shifty News Network LLC-Leaky Faucets


丂ħ̧i̧₣ɫ̵γ͘ ̶™
 Share

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, Smith said:

This is interesting. The timestamp says today. When are these logs with this anonymous individual from?

If they're old and outdated you guys would have published them and "tried" to burn me.

Obviously now you're just trying damage control.

You're gonna need more than "well he doesn't give timestamps, look we got caught, but we won't release them to absolve ourselves, but hey don't worry about us, worry about him"

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Smith said:

This is interesting. The timestamp says today. When are these logs with this anonymous individual from?

I mean Adrienne is literally the only one who can answer this besides our leaker. If these logs are stale she should have no problem doing so.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Smith said:

This is interesting. The timestamp says today. When are these logs with this anonymous individual from?

Also, I looked on TKR discord  and could not find the logs.  Where did you get these? I doubt Niz would have a convo like this on P&W main, and I don't know how you would get this on DM (unless the other person leaked)

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Ryan1 said:

Also, I looked on TKR discord  and could not find the logs.  Where did you get these? I doubt Niz would have a convo like this on P&W main, and I don't know how you would get this on DM (unless the other person leaked)

Bro.  Really?  You can't be this obtuse.  Typically people that discuss OPSEC things happen in private not on public servers etc AKA DMs or private servers/channels lol.

Edited by Seeker
  • Upvote 4
  • Downvote 1

gog-forum-size-regs.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, LeotheGreat said:

I mean Adrienne is literally the only one who can answer this besides our leaker. If these logs are stale she should have no problem doing so.

Tbf, shifty's credibility is somewhere below that of a tabloid/conspiracy theorist. Pumping out irrelevant info or pure bs is kinda his thing

  • Upvote 5
  • Downvote 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Nizam Adrienne said:

Really, Shifty? Is it such a slow news day you're posting fake logs? While we're playing corrupt detective however, thought I'd share a fun revelation of my own...

o23Wl5i.png

What was said before that?  Context would be nice.

  • Upvote 2

gog-forum-size-regs.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Nizam Adrienne said:

Really, Shifty? Is it such a slow news day you're posting fake logs? While we're playing corrupt detective however, thought I'd share a fun revelation of my own...

o23Wl5i.png

Screenshot_93.png.20348a3f64c90ffba8a5f15f62595a31.png

  • Upvote 3

Dec 26 18:48:22 <JacobH[Arrgh]>    God your worse the grealind >.>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Nizam Adrienne said:

Really, Shifty? Is it such a slow news day you're posting fake logs? While we're playing corrupt detective however, thought I'd share a fun revelation of my own...

o23Wl5i.png

Damn they found out I'm Mitsuru's evil twin.

Edited by ⚔ϟħ̧i̧₣ɫ̵γ͘ ̶™⚔
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Insert Name Here said:

I'm not saying these Shifty logs are legit, but the fact that it has gotten several TKR sphere bigshots to post here (wihtout actually presenting any conclusive evidence as to why they're fake and attacking Shifty instead) makes me wonder.

To be fair, what evidence could they possibly present that would prove anything to everyone's satisfaction and not blow whatever opsec they've got left? Denial is pretty much their best bet right now. What else are they gonna do, post their actual war plans? Give everyone the full logs of their coalition chat? Maybe invite IQ and syndisphere ambassadors to their sekrit war discord?

...

Actually. Why not? C'mon TKR, just do it! break the mold, change the meta! Prove you're different than the common pixelhugger alliance and play your cards face up; it's more fun than you think! After all...

2innwt.jpg

Edited by Sir Scarfalot
  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Insert Name Here said:

I'm not saying these Shifty logs are legit, but the fact that it has gotten several TKR sphere bigshots to post here (wihtout actually presenting any conclusive evidence as to why they're fake and attacking Shifty instead) makes me wonder.

How do you prove something doesn't exist?

C0r3Fye.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Insert Name Here said:

 

By trying not to handle it publicly for starters. :P

When someone posts something like this in public for everyone to see you have to give some sort of public response for everyone to see. Otherwise the general public will only see one side of the story.

I do agree though that actual reasonable discussion won't take place in public like this.

  • Upvote 1

C0r3Fye.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Smith said:

When someone posts something like this in public for everyone to see you have to give some sort of public response for everyone to see. Otherwise the general public will only see one side of the story.

I do agree though that actual reasonable discussion won't take place in public like this.

 

I get what you're saying, and this is no shade: to me (and this is a personal opinion, might not be the proper way but that's what I'd do) TKR and TCW gov members feeling the need to reply to these logs in public makes you look guilty. I'm not claiming you are, nor do I have enough data to make an informed opinion.

But what I'd do is ignore it and, when approached privately by the concerned parties, give a short answer where you basically state it's BS and go on about your business. Going to the concerned parties yourselves would also make you look guilty imo. At the end of the day the only thing it will change is people's perceptions. Those who are biased towards you will believe you, those who are biased against you will believe the logs. But for the average neutral, I reckon they'd be more inclined to think the logs were BS if there was no public reaction.

I for one don't know. I've learned not to take logs at face value, but I won't claim they're false bceause I don't have enough info. To me this is just another one of Shifty's threads, which is by far the most interesting content on these forums, seen as everyhting else seems to be micro related garbage.

Edited by Insert Name Here
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Insert Name Here said:

 

I get what you're saying, and this is no shade: to me (and this is a personal opinion, might not be the proper way but that's what I'd do) TKR and TCW gov members feeling the need to reply to these logs in public makes you seem guilty. I'm not claiming you are, nor do I have enough data to make an informed opinion.

But what I'd do is ignore it and, when approached privately by the concerned parties, you just give a short answer where you basically state it's BS and go on about your business. Going to the concerned parties yourselves would also make you look guilty imo. At the end of the day the only thing it will change is people's perceptions. Those who are biased towards you will believe you, those who are biased against you will believe the logs. But for the average neutral, I reckon they'd be more inclined to thinkthe logs were BS if there was no public reaction.

I for one don't know. I've learned not to take logs at face value, but I won't claim they're false bceause I don't have enough info. To me this is just another one of Shifty's threads, which is by far the most interesting content on these forums, seen as everyhting else seems to be micro related garbage.

No offense taken! I appreciate you talking in good faith like that. I do think it's a lose-lose situation for us though. For everyone who thinks defending ourselves makes us look guilty there will be another guy going "look they won't even defend themselves they must be guilty." Even if the concerned parties believe you after talking with them that's still a lot of other people who may think differently of you now.

And it's also possible the concerned parties wouldn't bother messaging us first if they believe the logs to be true. The burden is on us since we're the ones in the logs imo

C0r3Fye.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.