Jump to content
Flame of the Flawed

Businessweek Exclusive: Syndicate Corporate Security Expands Geographic Footprint

Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, Settra said:

Supporting a known racist, eh?

 

16 hours ago, Buorhann said:

I doubt they even know who you’re referring to.

 

16 hours ago, Settra said:

Then they should do their homework, no?

 

16 hours ago, Buorhann said:

In any case, doesn’t really matter.  Let’s just sit back and watch.

Fun fact: this thread has nothing to do with TRF 😊 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Buorhann said:

Hence my last reply you quoted.

Lovely. I was concerned that we were all you guys thought about so I’m relieved that’s not the case. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Django Jane said:

Lovely. I was concerned that we were all you guys thought about so I’m relieved that’s not the case. 

We don’t think about you. I had to look up who this was since you changed your name Lmfaooooo 

  • Downvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Kastor said:

We don’t think about you. I had to look up who this was since you changed your name Lmfaooooo 

Henry/Ambrose/Kylo Ren pls

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Betulius said:

Henry/Ambrose/Kylo Ren pls

Yet you always knew who I was.

  • Downvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Kastor said:

Yet you always knew who I was.

Generally took me a bit to figure it out, actually. Tended to write them off as some random idiot.

  • Upvote 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Django Jane said:

Fun fact: this thread has nothing to do with TRF 😊 

Protip: I was responding to rey.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Prefonteen said:

Incorect.

 

 

Theory 3 suggests that something occurred which put Pantheon in a position of danger -be it internally or externally- and t$ moved to assist in the stabilization process; This being done in broad daylight and behind no backs.

 

Life can be so simple sometimes!

 

Thanks for the insight, papa Snek! But I wasn't shit talking t$, even tho the alliance still has way too much Zed and Chaunce. :wub:

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Gio Remo said:

Yay!!! More treaties...

 

This poster has truly seen the light of the Roqist International. They have secretly begun infiltrating all paperless alliances with the goal of bringing paper back to Orbis. More papers, please! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/15/2018 at 10:45 PM, Insert Name Here said:

 

t$ is protecting Pantheon and apparently signing a treaty with the Church of Atom and DB.

EDIT: actually it says "current" so idk if they protect Church of Atom and DB without paper or whatever the deal is.

I know we (DB) have a paperless treaty with them and we protect CoA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Lucifer Morningstar said:

paperless treaty

this is why we can't have nice things

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Betulius said:

this is why we can't have nice things

It's okay, DB will never honor whatever they imagine there because they're scared of losing pixels 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/18/2018 at 11:43 PM, Darth Revan said:

It's okay, DB will never honor whatever they imagine there because they're scared of losing pixels 

Das ist viel Scheiße. We aren't afraid of losing pixels, at least most of us aren't.

Edited by Lucifer Morningstar
I hate bad grammar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/18/2018 at 4:43 PM, Darth Revan said:

It's okay, DB will never honor whatever they imagine there because they're scared of losing pixels 

Didn’t some of your guys complain heavily about losing pixels?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Lucifer Morningstar said:

Das ist viel Scheiße. We aren't afraid of losing pixels, at least most of us aren't.

Why'd you stay out of the war when BC (your closest ally on paper iirc) was burning then? 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Darth Revan said:

Why'd you stay out of the war when BC (your closest ally on paper iirc) was burning then? 

 

 

I'd guess, non-chaining? :P 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Darth Revan said:

Why'd you stay out of the war when BC (your closest ally on paper iirc) was burning then? 

 

In their defence they sent a fair amount of members over throughout the war. While they didn't enter they did still offer some assistance.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Shadowthrone said:

 

I'd guess, non-chaining? :P 

Our treaty was carried over from the BC bloc which was a non-chaining MDoAP with a supremacy clause. I believe we removed the supremacy clause when we disbanded the bloc. However this is not the only reason.. there were other constraints. We had good times and bad times. I don't really wish to rehash old matters here and just want to say that I wish BC all the best going forward. They will always have a special place in my heart

Edited by Yoda
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.