Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  On 5/3/2018 at 3:03 AM, Mad Max said:

because I don't care

Vote is invalid - you need to know whos actually playing/going to play and compile their names for a proper ratio vote. Anyone could have voted in this, including me, who doesn't play NatRP and won't be.

Only invalid cause your preferred choice is losing, hm?



I posted that the vote wasn't valid after a discussion with RP'ers on this forum - it is invalid because anyone can vote, a vote should only be held where people who are actually playing vote to decide on a changing factor in the system that y'all use. I posted that the vote didn't count because there are people that don't play Nat RP - like me, so you have someone voting who isn't even participating. 

Like usual, Eva sticks her head up her ass and takes it the wrong way. I am not going to be participating in any RP located here on the PW forums - that was pretty evident in my original post when I said "anyone could have voted in this, including me, who doesn't play natRp and won't be"  

Eva & Co. Y'all are a bunch of retards. 

This gonna be considered IC bc its RP. All if this is just RP. 

 

 

Edited by Mad Max
  • Like 3
  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Downvote incomming in 3... 2... 1... 

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I mean, if you wanted the vote to only include those who participate in the RP, then you shouldn't have voted in the first place. Also, from the time that you voted, up until "yes" started losing, you said absolutely nothing about the vote being invalid. Just saying. : P

  • Upvote 7
  • Downvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But if yes won you'd have 'threatned' with leaving NatRP and dowvnoting everyones posts for no reason except of hatred and would have accused mods of being corrupt or something bad. Those whom have voted with yes and with that lost,  they have kept silence,  except the Mad Max post about your whatever. But I don't see you keeping shut after losing. 

And he does have a point,  doesn't matter when he points out that only RPer participaints can vote,  it is important that he pointed it out and that is stayed in only in the sphere of RPers. Still,  seeing from your actions innpast in ORP of invinting ooc friends to the rp with whom you are close with just so they can protect you inside the rp. 

And alas,  be original. 

Edited by Rimski
  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Eva-Beatrice said:

I mean, if you wanted the vote to only include those who participate in the RP, then you shouldn't have voted in the first place. Also, from the time that you voted, up until "yes" started losing, you said absolutely nothing about the vote being invalid. Just saying. : P

Actually - I said you were complete trash to just about everyone at least once. 

Lies again - headupass syndrome.

#urtrash

#MAXimumRP

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I voted in that poll.  I voted "No" on removing the consent rule because, from my previous experiences of being part of roleplay groups, removing the consent will pretty much completely gut the roleplay community.  Instead of people focusing on creativity, they turn into bickering players because players will have different perspectives as to who should win and how.  And that's never good.

Keeping the consent rule forces players to talk ahead of time, so they each know the expectations to what they should build the story towards.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wanted to point out

Sea gave the hippo an upvote

Most iconical thing to happen in this sub

Edited by Rimski

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/6/2018 at 5:13 PM, Buorhann said:

I voted in that poll.  I voted "No" on removing the consent rule because, from my previous experiences of being part of roleplay groups, removing the consent will pretty much completely gut the roleplay community.  Instead of people focusing on creativity, they turn into bickering players because players will have different perspectives as to who should win and how.  And that's never good.

Keeping the consent rule forces players to talk ahead of time, so they each know the expectations to what they should build the story towards.

Said pretty much the same but more assertively in the original poll. Glad to know I'm not the only one who speaks from experience.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Experiences vary, and I spoke from my experience in this very natrp that consent inevitably causes stagnation. You can continue to try and talk as if you are the only use one who has RPd in the entirety of this RP, or you can show respect to the arguements that oppose you and actually discussed it. All you did in that post is say the other side was wrong rather than try to work with that side on a resolution. Even if you actually believe it's a flawless rule, you should still be open to discussing it rather than just tossing up insults and trying to shutdown any discussion. Maybe that's just me.

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As humans we are rarely alone in others sharing our opinions, regardless as to their state of correctness. Maybe that's just me, therefore, is a non-sequitor to any point ever made. I did not share your PoV. You were not going to change that PoV. That PoV has still not changed.. and therefore.. discussion would literally be a waste of all of our time.

Also, if the rp stagnates.. it's the fault of those who simply are butt-hurt their PoV didn't win the poll and they therefore can't control everything by mere bandwagining.. the rp continues even now, despite your assertions.

Edited by Maelstrom Vortex
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How is stagnation the fault of people who voted for change? If the RP stagnates at this point, which I strongly believe it will, then it will be the fault of those who tried to keep it the same. I would love to hear the logic behind how it would somehow be our fault for I guess wanting to alter the inevitable path the RP will follow, but your post reaks of the 'Nou' variety.

If you read my assertions, it said it would happen in 5-6 months, not immeadietly. So once again, you are trying to make a point and are falling flat.

And saying discussion is a waste of time when voting is a very poor way of handling a situation. If you are not open to discussion on things, are set in your ways and determined to retain your stance on everything, then your life will be quite boring. I encourage you to open your mind and listen to others rather then pompously cling to your own ideas religiously. You'll find life more enjoyable.

Edited by Spectral
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Spectral said:

How is stagnation the fault of people who voted for change? If the RP stagnates at this point, which I strongly believe it will, then it will be the fault of those who tried to keep it the same. I would love to hear the logic behind how it would somehow be our fault for I guess wanting to alter the inevitable path the RP will follow, but your post reaks of the 'Nou' variety.

If you read my assertions, it said it would happen in 5-6 months, not immeadietly. So once again, you are trying to make a point and are falling flat.

And saying discussion is a waste of time when voting is a very poor way of handling a situation. If you are not open to discussion on things, are set in your ways and determined to retain your stance on everything, then your life will be quite boring. I encourage you to open your mind and listen to others rather then pompously cling to your own ideas religiously. You'll find life more enjoyable.

The issue is that in NatRP it is founded on Sandbox rping which is, for me a good and bad thing. Good is it is good for starters,  Bad it stagnates because nothing interesting can be done. Most of the RPs are stuck to internal usually unoriginal posts which have no need to be read. The other problem is that if the consent rule us removed we will have two ORPs. My thought on this is that we should have a modified rule where we can engage in active conflicts of any kind but in a manner where total destruction of the nation would not be. Let's say,  a 'limited strike' rule. You could fight a naval battle to result in a blockade. Or combat in 'Proxy War' in the No Man's land aka unclaimed teritorries. With the consent rule you could grab land as you wish,  trigger ic hatred and wish for war but you could just hide behind the consent rule with no army and no fear of getting rolled.

 

tl;dr consent rule is removed and a new rule is set which will make NatRP a different rp than ORP. 

Edited by Rimski

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.