Jump to content

South Africa going full Mugabe


Rozalia
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Rygus said:

Eh? Alabama isn't blue, what're you on? They've been republican for a long time and will continue to be. Roy Moore wasn't a pedophile, as far as I'm concerned, he's innocent until proven guilty, and he hasn't been proven guilty by any means. The women who accused him admitted to forging the creepy comments in her yearbook that were supposedly from Roy Moore. There was another instance of her story not adding up as well. She claimed she couldn't get away because of child locks, but cars in the 70s didn't have child locks. I've been paying to attention to this whole argument, and all you seem to do is personally attack Rozalia. He may "not have morals" but at least he has the common sense to understand and form a decent argument with real evidence. What you see in the Alabama election is the desperate last attempts of the Democrats to get seats in congress, they have to go so far as to make allegations based on literally nothing to win elections.

I would argue the the most hypocritical person here is you, the most immoral one, you. Wanna know why? You perpetuate an argument based on thousands of different, personal accounts, and potentially tampered and forced testimonies from war criminals who were probably promised a shortened sentence or better prison quarters if they fit the narrative driven by the allies, this leads to the fact that all the numbers ever given were rough estimates, not absolutes in the Holocaust. But it is a known FACT that white farmers (Boers specifically) are killed and impoverished by the government daily because of the ruling parties of South Africa. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doug_Jones_(politician)

Huh, well look at that! Doug Jones is a democrat. For such a red state, Alabama sure dropped the ball by electing a blue-balling democrat. I believe that makes Alabama blue by the most recent election standards. As for fake allegations, it sure seems that the state of Alabama found them convincing enough to elect a democrat, despite the state being red for the past 20 years by 20 point margins. The better question is, what the frick are you on?

 

Oh wow. I'm assuming that you never read a book in your life about the Holocaust. Because there's a lot of photographic evidence there. I'm also assuming you didn't read a book on the Nuremberg trials either, otherwise you would have known that most of those Nazi !@#$ gave the middle finger to the tribunal and hanged for it all the while admitting that they did some heinous shit. And here's how I know you don't know what the frick you are talking about: 

10 minutes ago, Rygus said:

...who were probably promised a shortened sentence or better prison quarters if they fit the narrative driven by the allies, this leads to the fact that all the numbers ever given were rough estimates, not absolutes in the Holocaust.

Which is what most people would put when they assume shit they don't know about without sounding like a total dipshit. 

 

I really don't understand neo-nazis. If you honestly believe that your ideology is somehow in the right, you seem to really suck at learning your own history and intellectually defending your ideology. You give neo-nazis a bad name, because everyone just thinks you're all a bunch of dipshits who don't know history and are mad about every single thing that happens to a white person. 

It's a useful mental exercise. Through the years, many thinkers have been fascinated by it. But I don't enjoy playing. It was a game that was born during a brutal age when life counted for little. Everyone believed that some people were worth more than others. Kings. Pawns. I don't think that anyone is worth more than anyone else. Chess is just a game. Real people are not pieces. You can't assign more value to some of them and not others. Not to me. Not to anyone. People are not a thing that you can sacrifice. The lesson is, if anyone who looks on to the world as if it was a game of chess, deserves to lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Caecus said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doug_Jones_(politician)

Huh, well look at that! Doug Jones is a democrat. For such a red state, Alabama sure dropped the ball by electing a blue-balling democrat. I believe that makes Alabama blue by the most recent election standards. As for fake allegations, it sure seems that the state of Alabama found them convincing enough to elect a democrat, despite the state being red for the past 20 years by 20 point margins. The better question is, what the frick are you on?

 

Oh wow. I'm assuming that you never read a book in your life about the Holocaust. Because there's a lot of photographic evidence there. I'm also assuming you didn't read a book on the Nuremberg trials either, otherwise you would have known that most of those Nazi !@#$ gave the middle finger to the tribunal and hanged for it all the while admitting that they did some heinous shit. And here's how I know you don't know what the frick you are talking about: 

Which is what most people would put when they assume shit they don't know about without sounding like a total dipshit. 

 

I really don't understand neo-nazis. If you honestly believe that your ideology is somehow in the right, you seem to really suck at learning your own history and intellectually defending your ideology. You give neo-nazis a bad name, because everyone just thinks you're all a bunch of dipshits who don't know history and are mad about every single thing that happens to a white person. 

Since when has the populous, mob rule or otherwise, had common sense? The the reason the founding fathers created the electoral college was to prevent situations like Roy Moore from happening. Just because the populous thinks something as a majority, doesn't mean they're right.

I've read plenty, including "Night" by Elie Wiesel, a good story, but with many peculiar remarks about the their treatment in the concentration camp he was in, at least compared to other survivor stories. I'm not denying that lots of people died in the Holocaust, but the point is that the death toll is just estimated, and the theories that it was on the direct orders of Hitler are just that. You can find hundreds of thousands of pictures of the holocaust on the internet, but none of them are clear enough to completely determine the cause of death. The prisoners starving was probably because Germany was fighting a losing war for a while, and the Allies cut off most of the supply routes to the concentration camps. The Germans knew the end was near and therefore abandoned the camps to disease and rot. The 24 officers condemned at the trials probably didn't give a shit, and shouted profanities because of their pure hate towards the allies. If you want an example of a neo-nazi, look to Arthur Jones, he's a good example. You will find that cut-and-dry National Socialists like Arthur Jones are much less tolerable or debatable. 

Edited by Rygus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 23/03/2018 at 3:29 AM, Caecus said:

Not Trump dick pics. Trump fricking another woman while his wife just squeezed his child out of her vagina and then having the intelligence to then have the woman sign a NDA, but the stupidity not to sign it himself. 

In the state of Alabama, supporting and defending a pedophile is called being amoral. That's why Alabama is a blue state now. If somehow the collective state of Alabama has a better moral compass than you, you don't have any morals, and each time you shout out "I WANT A PEDOPHILE FOR SENATE!", you are in reality claiming "I DON'T HAVE A fricking MORAL COMPASS!"

Furthermore, are you suggesting you have morals? Take your own advise, and don't make ridiculous claims you can't back up.  

Okay, and? It could come out that Trump was dicking a different pornstar everyday. It simply is not a thing that damages him. 

??? You need to learnt to stop with the stupid. I personally stated on here my view that he was a fool for the pathetic attempt at a defense he tried as it just made him sound bad true or not. That was my involvement in it all. I didn't support him or go about telling people to vote for him or whatever you think. 

You claimed that I have no morals. I challenged you to cite where I said such a thing. You were the one who made the claim and now have to back it up, not me. So either back it up, or retract it. I actually do have morals, they are simply different than what would be considered the norm. I'm not a puritan like you no. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/27/2018 at 2:17 PM, Rozalia said:

Okay, and? It could come out that Trump was dicking a different pornstar everyday. It simply is not a thing that damages him. 

??? You need to learnt to stop with the stupid. I personally stated on here my view that he was a fool for the pathetic attempt at a defense he tried as it just made him sound bad true or not. That was my involvement in it all. I didn't support him or go about telling people to vote for him or whatever you think. 

You claimed that I have no morals. I challenged you to cite where I said such a thing. You were the one who made the claim and now have to back it up, not me. So either back it up, or retract it. I actually do have morals, they are simply different than what would be considered the norm. I'm not a puritan like you no. 

Silly Roz, how can you stand there, say all that shit, and claim that I have no evidence that you don't have a shred of moral fiber in your entire body?

Let's just break down your post:

1. You are unfazed by the fact that the leader of the free world is an unfaithful, lying sack of shit. People with morals would be appalled, and wonder what role model Trump is presenting to children who watch him on TV babbling and grabbing !@#$. Thus, you have no morals.

2. Your condemnation of Moore isn't that he's a child-molesting piece of shit, but that he had a "pathetic attempt at a defense," meaning that you are more appalled by his public imaging than the actual morality of a 30 year old man hanging around malls and high schools to date teenagers. Again, no morals.  

3. The fact that you are so blind to your own egregious amoral statements above goes to show that you don't think there is anything wrong with defending a pedophile or having a role model for children be an unfaithful lying sack of shit. Thus, you are a person without a single moral thought. 

 

You say I have no evidence that you don't have any morals, but every single post you put up is ironically the evidence that you claim I don't have. Lol. 

 

On 3/27/2018 at 2:10 PM, Rygus said:

Since when has the populous, mob rule or otherwise, had common sense? The the reason the founding fathers created the electoral college was to prevent situations like Roy Moore from happening. Just because the populous thinks something as a majority, doesn't mean they're right.

I've read plenty, including "Night" by Elie Wiesel, a good story, but with many peculiar remarks about the their treatment in the concentration camp he was in, at least compared to other survivor stories. I'm not denying that lots of people died in the Holocaust, but the point is that the death toll is just estimated, and the theories that it was on the direct orders of Hitler are just that. You can find hundreds of thousands of pictures of the holocaust on the internet, but none of them are clear enough to completely determine the cause of death. The prisoners starving was probably because Germany was fighting a losing war for a while, and the Allies cut off most of the supply routes to the concentration camps. The Germans knew the end was near and therefore abandoned the camps to disease and rot. The 24 officers condemned at the trials probably didn't give a shit, and shouted profanities because of their pure hate towards the allies. If you want an example of a neo-nazi, look to Arthur Jones, he's a good example. You will find that cut-and-dry National Socialists like Arthur Jones are much less tolerable or debatable. 

So, any majority ruling is, in essence, lacking in common sense? By my understanding, the vast majority of people don't think that you should gas Jews. Mob rule, amirite? Oh! And don't forget that the vast majority of people don't want pedophiles in the Senate representing them. They are definitely wrong. Your argument is that the majority of people who disagree with your stupid views is wrong, rather convenient for you to claim when you are on the opposite side of morality. 

So, getting back to the topic, you honestly think that there are more sad poor white farmers dying in South Africa than there were Jews in the Holocaust? Furthermore, you're trying to blame the Allies for Jews getting gassed??? See, this is why I think you don't read. I don't think you know anything about Nazi history. I think you think it's a wonderful idea to bring it back without understanding basic details and facts as to what that would mean. 

 

I mean, you do realize that the first people the Nazis killed weren't Jews right? Do you know who they were? They were mentally retarded and handicapped people like yourself. You bring back Nazism, and you would ironically be one of the first dipshits they gassed. You're like a fly who thinks spider webs are cool. I don't understand how people can be so blind to their own self-interests. 

It's a useful mental exercise. Through the years, many thinkers have been fascinated by it. But I don't enjoy playing. It was a game that was born during a brutal age when life counted for little. Everyone believed that some people were worth more than others. Kings. Pawns. I don't think that anyone is worth more than anyone else. Chess is just a game. Real people are not pieces. You can't assign more value to some of them and not others. Not to me. Not to anyone. People are not a thing that you can sacrifice. The lesson is, if anyone who looks on to the world as if it was a game of chess, deserves to lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Caecus said:

Silly Roz, how can you stand there, say all that shit, and claim that I have no evidence that you don't have a shred of moral fiber in your entire body?

Let's just break down your post:

1. You are unfazed by the fact that the leader of the free world is an unfaithful, lying sack of shit. People with morals would be appalled, and wonder what role model Trump is presenting to children who watch him on TV babbling and grabbing !@#$. Thus, you have no morals.

2. Your condemnation of Moore isn't that he's a child-molesting piece of shit, but that he had a "pathetic attempt at a defense," meaning that you are more appalled by his public imaging than the actual morality of a 30 year old man hanging around malls and high schools to date teenagers. Again, no morals.  

3. The fact that you are so blind to your own egregious amoral statements above goes to show that you don't think there is anything wrong with defending a pedophile or having a role model for children be an unfaithful lying sack of shit. Thus, you are a person without a single moral thought. 

 

You say I have no evidence that you don't have any morals, but every single post you put up is ironically the evidence that you claim I don't have. Lol. 

Because you have no evidence. You're just a dishonest person playing at puritanism so you can manufacture some outrage and send it my way. You break a promise to no longer post here if you lost the bet (which you did) and then attack me on morality? Get the hell out of here with that you damn liar. 

Dicking women, dicking dudes, whatever. It ain't illegal nor is it our business. It ain't Trump's business to be your role model. He ain't your father. He ain't your brother. He doesn't let such things slow him down and good on him. As for grabbing !@#$, even children know such a basic truth as what Trump said. If you ever decided to use your brain you'd realise that fact. Why is a rich famous guy easily getting women in bed so damn shocking to you? It has been the case since man began. Denying it only makes you look like an idiot. 

I didn't comment on the case so you go straight into thinking I'm defending him. Dishonest as usual. I have no need to comment on something ongoing and by all accounts will lead to nothing happening to him. 

No. I have a reasoned and sound morality rather than this pathetic puritanism you're trying to push, which you, being dishonest, only push so strongly because you want to attack Trump. You're completely see through and everybody can see it.  

Edited by Rozalia
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Caecus said:

Silly Roz, how can you stand there, say all that shit, and claim that I have no evidence that you don't have a shred of moral fiber in your entire body?

Let's just break down your post:

1. You are unfazed by the fact that the leader of the free world is an unfaithful, lying sack of shit. People with morals would be appalled, and wonder what role model Trump is presenting to children who watch him on TV babbling and grabbing !@#$. Thus, you have no morals.

2. Your condemnation of Moore isn't that he's a child-molesting piece of shit, but that he had a "pathetic attempt at a defense," meaning that you are more appalled by his public imaging than the actual morality of a 30 year old man hanging around malls and high schools to date teenagers. Again, no morals.  

3. The fact that you are so blind to your own egregious amoral statements above goes to show that you don't think there is anything wrong with defending a pedophile or having a role model for children be an unfaithful lying sack of shit. Thus, you are a person without a single moral thought. 

 

You say I have no evidence that you don't have any morals, but every single post you put up is ironically the evidence that you claim I don't have. Lol. 

 

So, any majority ruling is, in essence, lacking in common sense? By my understanding, the vast majority of people don't think that you should gas Jews. Mob rule, amirite? Oh! And don't forget that the vast majority of people don't want pedophiles in the Senate representing them. They are definitely wrong. Your argument is that the majority of people who disagree with your stupid views is wrong, rather convenient for you to claim when you are on the opposite side of morality. 

So, getting back to the topic, you honestly think that there are more sad poor white farmers dying in South Africa than there were Jews in the Holocaust? Furthermore, you're trying to blame the Allies for Jews getting gassed??? See, this is why I think you don't read. I don't think you know anything about Nazi history. I think you think it's a wonderful idea to bring it back without understanding basic details and facts as to what that would mean. 

 

I mean, you do realize that the first people the Nazis killed weren't Jews right? Do you know who they were? They were mentally retarded and handicapped people like yourself. You bring back Nazism, and you would ironically be one of the first dipshits they gassed. You're like a fly who thinks spider webs are cool. I don't understand how people can be so blind to their own self-interests. 

Good job twisting what I said to fit your own argument. The majority of Germans pre-WWII hated the Jews, this is a good example of mob rule. Hitler made himself a representative of the German people at the time. If you knew this, you would agree with me that mob rule is bad. I never said there were more, I said the discrimination in South Africa is more verifiable, since there have been numerous documentaries and papers on it, and especially because it's extremely recent, relevant, and easily provable in the modern world.. How about you read up on those? Your argument is based on falsehoods. Roy Moore isn't a pedophile because his accuser has little to no evidence, and has even forged evidence against him. Attacking me personally, calling me mentally ill as an insult, makes you look like an inconsiderate child. I don't like National Socialism, I've never advocated for the ideology, so I don't know why you continue to accuse me of being one. You're a sheep in a flock of ignorant folks who are stuck in their own bubble throwing names and insults around to people you don't even know. My argument is that mob rule, where the populous, though incorrect in their thinking (PROVED TO BE INCORRECT IN THEIR THINKING), still have the power over the government, and that it shouldn't be a thing, giving all the power to the people degenerates a society and ultimately weakens it, it feels good to have, but it's not ultimately good for the society, government, and culture that exists there. It's less of a blame, and more of a consequence. Their invasion of Germany lead to the Germans abandoning the concentration camps, the supply lines to the concentration camps, and any hospital facilities there in order to fight the allies in Berlin and the Battle of The Bulge. So the allies are partially responsible for some of the deaths in the concentration camps due to disease. If you understood history, and read "Night," you'd know this was true.

Edited by Rygus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Rozalia said:

Because you have no evidence. You're just a dishonest person playing at puritanism so you can manufacture some outrage and send it my way. You break a promise to no longer post here if you lost the bet (which you did) and then attack me on morality? Get the hell out of here with that you damn liar. 

Dicking women, dicking dudes, whatever. It ain't illegal nor is it our business. It ain't Trump's business to be your role model. He ain't your father. He ain't your brother. He doesn't let such things slow him down and good on him. As for grabbing !@#$, even children know such a basic truth as what Trump said. If you ever decided to use your brain you'd realise that fact. Why is a rich famous guy easily getting women in bed so damn shocking to you? It has been the case since man began. Denying it only makes you look like an idiot. 

I didn't comment on the case so you go straight into thinking I'm defending him. Dishonest as usual. I have no need to comment on something ongoing and by all accounts will lead to nothing happening to him. 

No. I have a reasoned and sound morality rather than this pathetic puritanism you're trying to push, which you, being dishonest, only push so strongly because you want to attack Trump. You're completely see through and everybody can see it.  

Dipshit teenagers tipping over a portapotty while a pregnant woman is inside dealing with a compressed bladder isn't illegal or any of our business. But I don't think anyone with a moral compass would look at that and say "those teenagers have the right idea." 

Again, you're kind of making my point for me. Is there anything else that I should add onto this? "Even children know such a basic truth" that men who are rich and powerful can sexually assault women? No wonder why you're a mess. Maybe that's what you've been taught growing up. You're lack of morality shouldn't be denied, but it also sounds like its not entirely your fault either. Sorry. 

4 hours ago, Rygus said:

Good job twisting what I said to fit your own argument. The majority of Germans pre-WWII hated the Jews, this is a good example of mob rule. Hitler made himself a representative of the German people at the time. If you knew this, you would agree with me that mob rule is bad. I never said there were more, I said the discrimination in South Africa is more verifiable, since there have been numerous documentaries and papers on it, and especially because it's extremely recent, relevant, and easily provable in the modern world.. How about you read up on those? Your argument is based on falsehoods. Roy Moore isn't a pedophile because his accuser has little to no evidence, and has even forged evidence against him. Attacking me personally, calling me mentally ill as an insult, makes you look like an inconsiderate child. I don't like National Socialism, I've never advocated for the ideology, so I don't know why you continue to accuse me of being one. You're a sheep in a flock of ignorant folks who are stuck in their own bubble throwing names and insults around to people you don't even know. My argument is that mob rule, where the populous, though incorrect in their thinking (PROVED TO BE INCORRECT IN THEIR THINKING), still have the power over the government, and that it shouldn't be a thing, giving all the power to the people degenerates a society and ultimately weakens it, it feels good to have, but it's not ultimately good for the society, government, and culture that exists there. It's less of a blame, and more of a consequence. Their invasion of Germany lead to the Germans abandoning the concentration camps, the supply lines to the concentration camps, and any hospital facilities there in order to fight the allies in Berlin and the Battle of The Bulge. So the allies are partially responsible for some of the deaths in the concentration camps due to disease. If you understood history, and read "Night," you'd know this was true.

!@#$! The Nazis didn't get more than a third of the Reichstag at any point in time. If that number sounds familiar, guess what the percentage of America are Trump supporters. Enabling Act, 1933. Go learn history. WHY THE frick DO NAZIS NOT LEARN THEIR OWN HISTORY?! Like, France studies Napoleon, Americans study the revolution and civil war, why the frick can't neo-Nazis get their shit together and know anything about themselves?

 

It's a useful mental exercise. Through the years, many thinkers have been fascinated by it. But I don't enjoy playing. It was a game that was born during a brutal age when life counted for little. Everyone believed that some people were worth more than others. Kings. Pawns. I don't think that anyone is worth more than anyone else. Chess is just a game. Real people are not pieces. You can't assign more value to some of them and not others. Not to me. Not to anyone. People are not a thing that you can sacrifice. The lesson is, if anyone who looks on to the world as if it was a game of chess, deserves to lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Caecus said:

Dipshit teenagers tipping over a portapotty while a pregnant woman is inside dealing with a compressed bladder isn't illegal or any of our business. But I don't think anyone with a moral compass would look at that and say "those teenagers have the right idea." 

Again, you're kind of making my point for me. Is there anything else that I should add onto this? "Even children know such a basic truth" that men who are rich and powerful can sexually assault women? No wonder why you're a mess. Maybe that's what you've been taught growing up. You're lack of morality shouldn't be denied, but it also sounds like its not entirely your fault either. Sorry. 

Cowardly Caecus again and again refuses to directly confront the fact he is a dirty liar who broke his promise.

No, you're the one who destroys yourself as per usual. Learn that you should lead with honesty as otherwise you are nothing and easily defeated. Trump's words were that they let you do it. Note, let, permission given. That is not sexual assault. The whole affair thing you've liked to mention recently by the way? She let him have her according to herself, didn't even need to give her anything though apparently he made some comments on getting her a spot on his show (which never happened). She can't say why she would be with Trump... ummm, I do wonder why. Oh wait, if it happened then it would be obvious why.

Rich men can get women much easier and they are more willing to let them do things. That doesn't just go for normal relationships. In the sex trade for example you can do more extreme things the more money you have. Continue to deny such simple and everlasting reality if you wish, you seem to like looking like an idiot. 

I'll give you some advice as I am charitable, not that you will take it. Stop being dishonest on Trump's statement. Be honest and accept the basic truth that yes, when you are rich women are far more likely to give you permission to "grab them by the !@#$" like they did for Trump (note, men are more than willing to have sex with old birds if the money and benefits are right. People can be greedy and sell themselves, who knew). Then having taken in this basic truth, never again try to use this method of attack. It's weak and serves no purpose. Trump is loved by his supporters for such statements, for such behaviour. The ones who don't like it but tolerate it will not be shocked by it and will continue to tolerate it. There is no winning anywhere by continuing this line of attack. The common person and I know even you know this as you're just being dishonest as that is who you are, knows these basic truths. When they see it being called out it doesn't change their minds, it just registers the attackers as idiots who are either being dishonest to attack or know absolutely nothing about how the world works. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Caecus said:

Dipshit teenagers tipping over a portapotty while a pregnant woman is inside dealing with a compressed bladder isn't illegal or any of our business. But I don't think anyone with a moral compass would look at that and say "those teenagers have the right idea." 

Again, you're kind of making my point for me. Is there anything else that I should add onto this? "Even children know such a basic truth" that men who are rich and powerful can sexually assault women? No wonder why you're a mess. Maybe that's what you've been taught growing up. You're lack of morality shouldn't be denied, but it also sounds like its not entirely your fault either. Sorry. 

!@#$! The Nazis didn't get more than a third of the Reichstag at any point in time. If that number sounds familiar, guess what the percentage of America are Trump supporters. Enabling Act, 1933. Go learn history. WHY THE frick DO NAZIS NOT LEARN THEIR OWN HISTORY?! Like, France studies Napoleon, Americans study the revolution and civil war, why the frick can't neo-Nazis get their shit together and know anything about themselves?

 

I think I've made this quite clear, I'm not a National Socialist. You repeating the same thing over and over just proves that you have a lack of arguments. And Hitler made his laws in accordance with what ethnic Germans wanted. This is dictatorship 101, make the populous and elites happy at the expense of someone else (in this case Jews, and wealthy Jews, who's wealth was confiscated) . This is partially how he stayed in power until his death. And you're seriously comparing The NSDAP to the GOP and Donald Trump? C'mon he has like a 41% approval rating (which peaked at like 46% at the beginning of his term), and if you can do math (which I assume you can) that's 2/5ths of support at this current time. Please don't allude to Donald Trump's policies being like Hitler's, or him being like Hitler at all, because he's not.

Edited by Rygus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.