Jump to content

The Imperium Responds to Unprovoked Aggression


Darknight
 Share

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, Who Me said:

I'm not sure why you quoted Leo and then went on to !@#$ about TKR but you keep doing you.

Any BK should be happy that we have decided to take the back seat and let you fools run around recklessly unchecked. Let it be a present that competence chooses him to be a stepping board for change.

  • Upvote 1
Lxr4VfE.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rache Olderen said:

Keep in mind IoM declared on us. So I will get back to you on that when I read Guardian's DoW.

Hence why I will never join BK, Curu being Canadian is a deal breaker.

Keep peddling boi, Chaunce wants his bby home. Get ready to write your demands on water lmfao.

Lxr4VfE.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Partisan said:

You refused to peace out the individual nations from IoM when they left JEst. You did not declare on IoM as an alliance.

Vosunda joined the Knights Templar after leaving JEst. I have been informed that you have not even attempted to go after him. This looks like a classic case of selective application of policy and flexing on the weak. Are you afraid?

It's almost like IoM sanctioned participation in JEst and had no intention of punishing anyone who went rogue and that fact was recognized and those not returning to the "nest" are having a different outcome.  Need some bleach to get the blood off your hands?  I recommend a good skin moisturizer after, bleach tends to dry the skin something terrible.

  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Rache Olderen said:

I would say more like realistic. Unless you are suggesting that while fighting a three front war against you, AO, and IoM we should open up yet another front or simply declare on anyone we possibly can thus overextending our forces and getting us bogged down in way too many wars is a good idea. Which if so I must question your strategic genius, which while I am sure is dynamic, seems to be overlooking a few things.

 

But I see your point. We will need to get the Rollinator 9000 ready to go then. Or start that Rolling Stone Crusade I was calling for against BK when our plans to roll them were leaked last year.

>Not declaring wars on all your enemies at once
>Needing to hold back to not get overexposed

At least you admit your weakness. And to be fair, IQ is indeed getting beiged by IoM. Like, right now. So, you're not wrong ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

8 hours ago, Rache Olderen said:

Keep in mind IoM declared on us. So I will get back to you on that when I read Guardian's DoW.


They absolutely did not; they countered attacks against their alliance. Sure, Arnout's ghosting is a rock-solid CB for you, but that doesn't change the fact that you struck first.

Edited by Sir Scarfalot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Sir Scarfalot said:

They absolutely did not; they countered attacks against their alliance. Sure, Arnout's ghosting is a rock-solid CB for you, but that doesn't change the fact that you struck first.

"Countered"

Oh boy. Sure, if you attack 1 nation for attacking your alliance, we would acknowledge that action as a counter attack.

Please recheck IoM's war activity and see what they did when "counter", by declaring over 20 wars, with only 3 against the original attacker.

And for that CB, Qora from Owr and Taco from Zodiac only hit Arnout and no one else, and Qora even peace out. There's no justification for IoM's actions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Tuanduy1102 said:

"Countered"

Oh boy. Sure, if you attack 1 nation for attacking your alliance, we would acknowledge that action as a counter attack.

Please recheck IoM's war activity and see what they did when "counter", by declaring over 20 wars, with only 3 against the original attacker.

And for that CB, Qora from Owr and Taco from Zodiac only hit Arnout and no one else, and Qora even peace out. There's no justification for IoM's actions.

....that's because you hit them, they tried to get it diplomatically resolved and you refused to peace out? Unless you plan to give KT the exact same treatment, You're out of line :P.

 

I've seen the logs. It was made very clear that there was no peace to be had. Good on IoM for standing up for itself.

Edited by Partisan
  • Upvote 4

 

os9LcJK.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/21/2018 at 10:48 AM, Rache Olderen said:

Keep in mind IoM declared on us. So I will get back to you on that when I read Guardian's DoW.

Hence why I will never join BK, Curu being Canadian is a deal breaker.

You guys should come after KT, we're harboring the evil @Vosunda after all. Bring your little myriad of raid targets alliance mates with ya. Hell you guys probably won't even need TKR, we're war virgins too. We've only ever warred micros to boot. Not too different than you guys, actually. But who doesn't dig a level playing field? Aside from IQ, of course. 

Edited by Thomas Meagher
  • Upvote 1

"The glory of the old Irish nation, which in our hour will grow young and strong again. Should we fail, the country will not be worth more than it is now. The sword of famine is less sparing than the bayonet of the soldier." 

-TM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Partisan said:

....that's because you hit them, they tried to get it diplomatically resolved and you refused to peace out? Unless you plan to give KT the exact same treatment, You're out of line :P.

 

I've seen the logs. It was made very clear that there was no peace to be had. Good on IoM for standing up for itself.

I was focusing more on the "counter" part but oh well.

They can't resolve a dispute between 2-3 nations so they extended the war on the whole alliance? That's cute. IQ is just returning the favor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Thomas Meagher said:

You guys should come after KT, we're harboring the evil @Vosunda after all. Bring your little myriad of raid raid targets alliance mates with ya. Hell you guys probably won't even need TKR, we're war virgins too. We've only ever warred micros to boot. Not too different than you guys, actually. But who doesn't dig a level playing field? Aside from IQ, of course. 

Guys I only come when summoned. 

That being said... I wouldn't really call it a level playing field. 

NSJYPtR.png

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Rache Olderen said:

I would say more like realistic. Unless you are suggesting that while fighting a three front war against you, AO, and IoM we should open up yet another front or simply declare on anyone we possibly can thus overextending our forces and getting us bogged down in way too many wars is a good idea. Which if so I must question your strategic genius, which while I am sure is dynamic, seems to be overlooking a few things.

 

But I see your point. We will need to get the Rollinator 9000 ready to go then. Or start that Rolling Stone Crusade I was calling for against BK when our plans to roll them were leaked last year.

Preserving for posterity. Right here we have an IQ leader saying that trying to fight more then 50 nations with over 400 would be an over extension for them.

12 hours ago, Rache Olderen said:

Keep in mind IoM declared on us. So I will get back to you on that when I read Guardian's DoW.

And said same leader doesn't know the difference between a Recognition of War and a deceleration of war. Thats kinda sad.

2 hours ago, Tuanduy1102 said:

"Countered"

Oh boy. Sure, if you attack 1 nation for attacking your alliance, we would acknowledge that action as a counter attack.

Please recheck IoM's war activity and see what they did when "counter", by declaring over 20 wars, with only 3 against the original attacker.

And for that CB, Qora from Owr and Taco from Zodiac only hit Arnout and no one else, and Qora even peace out. There's no justification for IoM's actions.

I know you've never been exposed to a competent alliance before, but this is what competent alliances do when a member is attacked. If the attackers alliance leadership doesn't make them stop after trying diplomacy, its effectively an act of war by their alliance as a whole and should be treated as such.

  • Upvote 4

 

 

23:38 Skable that's why we don't want Rose involved, so we can take the m all for ourselves

23:39 [] but Mensa is the cute girl at the school dance and she's only dancing with us right now to get our friend jealous

23:39 [] If Rose comes in and gives Mensa what she wants, she'll just toss us aside and forget we ever existed

23:39 zombie_lanae yeah I do hope we can keep having them all to ourselves

23:40 zombie_lanae I know it's selfish but I want all their love

 

 

6:55 PM <+Isolatar> Praise Dio

Pubstomper|BNC [20:01:55] Rose wouldn't plan a hit on Mensa because it would be &#33;@#&#036;ing stupid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Dr Rush said:

Preserving for posterity. Right here we have an IQ leader saying that trying to fight more then 50 nations with over 400 would be an over extension for them.

And said same leader doesn't know the difference between a Recognition of War and a deceleration of war. Thats kinda sad.

I know you've never been exposed to a competent alliance before, but this is what competent alliances do when a member is attacked. If the attackers alliance leadership doesn't make them stop after trying diplomacy, its effectively an act of war by their alliance as a whole and should be treated as such.

Not an IQ leader so try again mate, I just do Economics.

Let me just clarify where you seem to be deluding yourself from reality. IoM's leader went into another alliance to hit us, we hit him back. Then IoM hit the rest of us. It would be like if I went into Lordaeron and hit, say Patrick Higgins, and then I dragged the rest of CS into war against Higgin's alliance for something I did when members of said alliance hits me back. Oh wait, I did in fact hit Higgins while in Lordaeron and I fully expected to be hit back but wouldn't have dragged my alliance through it so nevermind. Regardless they are recognizing hostilities that they caused because their leader decided to hit us

Edited by Rache Olderen

UQllJcz.png?2

2nd, 4th, and 6th Adelphotes Princeps of Cornerstone, Ambassador to Black Knights, 4th Grand Pilus of Cornerstone, 2nd Chaplain of Cornerstone, 5th Questor Princeps of Cornerstone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rache Olderen said:

Not an IQ leader so try again mate, I just do Economics.

Let me just clarify where you seem to be deluding yourself from reality. IoM's leader went into another alliance to hit us, we hit him back. Then IoM hit the rest of us. It would be like if I went into Lordaeron and hit, say Patrick Higgins, and then I dragged the rest of CS into war against Higgin's alliance for something I did when members of said alliance hits me back. Oh wait, I did in fact hit Higgins while in Lordaeron and I fully expected to be hit back but wouldn't have dragged my alliance through it so nevermind. Regardless they are recognizing hostilities that they caused because their leader decided to hit us

Hit the rest of the alliances that sent ghosts then. :D

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Partisan said:

I've seen the logs. It was made very clear that there was no peace to be had. Good on IoM for standing up for itself.

Arnout said very clearly *twice* that he would love to attack some more of us. After he said that, why would I consider to offer peace?

Edited by Taco
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Taco said:

Arnout said very clearly *twice* that he would love to attack some more of us. After he said that, why would I consider to offer peace?

Because you and your allies are getting rekt? Seems like a good idea for you to ask for peace, let alone 'offer' it. Maybe you thought that IoM were easy loot, but they're more competent than you thought.

  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Taco said:

Arnout said very clearly *twice* that he would love to attack some more of us. After he said that, why would I consider to offer peace?

Is that why you offered peace after you realized IoM suicide-fricked into you with 30 wars?

  • Upvote 1

 

os9LcJK.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Taco said:

Arnout said very clearly *twice* that he would love to attack some more of us. After he said that, why would I consider to offer peace?

Because I've said similar of literally every alliance?

Dec 26 18:48:22 <JacobH[Arrgh]>    God your worse the grealind >.>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't mind me. I'm just waiting on IQ to (as they've done with IoM) attack KT, Guardian and CoS for having members ghosting Terminal Jest. Maybe also SK and Durmstrang for having members ghosting Arrgh. IQ seem like a coherent and brave bunch, I'm sure they're gonna do it. :ph34r:

Edited by Insert Name Here
  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Partisan said:

Is that why you offered peace after you realized IoM suicide-fricked into you with 30 wars?

 

1 hour ago, Sir Scarfalot said:

Because you and your allies are getting rekt? Seems like a good idea for you to ask for peace, let alone 'offer' it. Maybe you thought that IoM were easy loot, but they're more competent than you thought.

IoM's Total Military:
Total Soldiers: 130,586
Total Tanks: 38
Total Aircraft: 1,293
Total Ships: 52
Total Missiles: 1
Total Nuclear Weapons: 0

IoM's Members:
Vacation Mode Members: 2 (8.7%)
Beige Nations: 14 (66.67%)
Gray Nations: 1 (4.76%)

IoMs Score:

iom.PNG

Now i know facts don't fly here on these forums, but i am a taco, and i don't fly either!

Edited by Taco
  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Taco said:

blah blah blah

BK stats:

Vacation Mode Members:5 (4.27%)
Beige Nations:15 (13.39%)
Gray Nations:16 (14.29%)

Zodiac stats:

Vacation Mode Members:4 (4.17%)
Beige Nations:5 (5.43%)
Gray Nations:10 (10.87%)

Cornerstone stats:

Vacation Mode Members:1 (1.85%)
Beige Nations:12 (22.64%)
Gray Nations:5 (9.43%)

That's 14 beige IoM to 32 beige IQ, and I've only looked at three of your alliances. Sure, IoM isn't responsible for all of those, but they're responsible for several, many of them against your own counters. More telling is the lack of vaca mode IoM compared to all the vaca mode IQ.

You are literally losing. Getting beiged by TJ is bad enough, but now you are getting beiged by a paperless, war virgin micro.

Edited by Sir Scarfalot
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sir Scarfalot said:

BK stats:

Vacation Mode Members:5 (4.27%)
Beige Nations:15 (13.39%)
Gray Nations:16 (14.29%)

Zodiac stats:

Vacation Mode Members:4 (4.17%)
Beige Nations:5 (5.43%)
Gray Nations:10 (10.87%)

Cornerstone stats:

 

You can't possibly demand decent stats from such a clear underdog though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.