Eumirbago Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 51 minutes ago, Who Me said: I'm not sure why you quoted Leo and then went on to !@#$ about TKR but you keep doing you. Any BK should be happy that we have decided to take the back seat and let you fools run around recklessly unchecked. Let it be a present that competence chooses him to be a stepping board for change. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eumirbago Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 2 hours ago, Rache Olderen said: Keep in mind IoM declared on us. So I will get back to you on that when I read Guardian's DoW. Hence why I will never join BK, Curu being Canadian is a deal breaker. Keep peddling boi, Chaunce wants his bby home. Get ready to write your demands on water lmfao. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Clooney Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 2 hours ago, Partisan said: You refused to peace out the individual nations from IoM when they left JEst. You did not declare on IoM as an alliance. Vosunda joined the Knights Templar after leaving JEst. I have been informed that you have not even attempted to go after him. This looks like a classic case of selective application of policy and flexing on the weak. Are you afraid? It's almost like IoM sanctioned participation in JEst and had no intention of punishing anyone who went rogue and that fact was recognized and those not returning to the "nest" are having a different outcome. Need some bleach to get the blood off your hands? I recommend a good skin moisturizer after, bleach tends to dry the skin something terrible. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Settra Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, Who Me said: I'm not sure why you quoted Leo and then went on to !@#$ about TKR but you keep doing you. http://www.espn.com/fantasy/baseball/ Edited February 21, 2018 by Robert E Lee 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Settra Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 6 hours ago, Who Me said: I'm not sure why you quoted Leo and then went on to !@#$ about TKR but you keep doing you. http://www.espn.com/fantasy/baseball/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Scarfalot Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 (edited) 7 hours ago, Rache Olderen said: I would say more like realistic. Unless you are suggesting that while fighting a three front war against you, AO, and IoM we should open up yet another front or simply declare on anyone we possibly can thus overextending our forces and getting us bogged down in way too many wars is a good idea. Which if so I must question your strategic genius, which while I am sure is dynamic, seems to be overlooking a few things. But I see your point. We will need to get the Rollinator 9000 ready to go then. Or start that Rolling Stone Crusade I was calling for against BK when our plans to roll them were leaked last year. >Not declaring wars on all your enemies at once >Needing to hold back to not get overexposed At least you admit your weakness. And to be fair, IQ is indeed getting beiged by IoM. Like, right now. So, you're not wrong ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 8 hours ago, Rache Olderen said: Keep in mind IoM declared on us. So I will get back to you on that when I read Guardian's DoW. They absolutely did not; they countered attacks against their alliance. Sure, Arnout's ghosting is a rock-solid CB for you, but that doesn't change the fact that you struck first. Edited February 22, 2018 by Sir Scarfalot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tuanduy1102 Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 34 minutes ago, Sir Scarfalot said: They absolutely did not; they countered attacks against their alliance. Sure, Arnout's ghosting is a rock-solid CB for you, but that doesn't change the fact that you struck first. "Countered" Oh boy. Sure, if you attack 1 nation for attacking your alliance, we would acknowledge that action as a counter attack. Please recheck IoM's war activity and see what they did when "counter", by declaring over 20 wars, with only 3 against the original attacker. And for that CB, Qora from Owr and Taco from Zodiac only hit Arnout and no one else, and Qora even peace out. There's no justification for IoM's actions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefonteen Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 (edited) 41 minutes ago, Tuanduy1102 said: "Countered" Oh boy. Sure, if you attack 1 nation for attacking your alliance, we would acknowledge that action as a counter attack. Please recheck IoM's war activity and see what they did when "counter", by declaring over 20 wars, with only 3 against the original attacker. And for that CB, Qora from Owr and Taco from Zodiac only hit Arnout and no one else, and Qora even peace out. There's no justification for IoM's actions. ....that's because you hit them, they tried to get it diplomatically resolved and you refused to peace out? Unless you plan to give KT the exact same treatment, You're out of line :P. I've seen the logs. It was made very clear that there was no peace to be had. Good on IoM for standing up for itself. Edited February 22, 2018 by Partisan 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diocletian Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 (edited) On 2/21/2018 at 10:48 AM, Rache Olderen said: Keep in mind IoM declared on us. So I will get back to you on that when I read Guardian's DoW. Hence why I will never join BK, Curu being Canadian is a deal breaker. You guys should come after KT, we're harboring the evil @Vosunda after all. Bring your little myriad of raid targets alliance mates with ya. Hell you guys probably won't even need TKR, we're war virgins too. We've only ever warred micros to boot. Not too different than you guys, actually. But who doesn't dig a level playing field? Aside from IQ, of course. Edited February 23, 2018 by Thomas Meagher 1 Quote "The happiness of the people, and the peace of the empire, and the glory of the reign are linked with the fortune of the Army." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tuanduy1102 Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 1 hour ago, Partisan said: ....that's because you hit them, they tried to get it diplomatically resolved and you refused to peace out? Unless you plan to give KT the exact same treatment, You're out of line :P. I've seen the logs. It was made very clear that there was no peace to be had. Good on IoM for standing up for itself. I was focusing more on the "counter" part but oh well. They can't resolve a dispute between 2-3 nations so they extended the war on the whole alliance? That's cute. IQ is just returning the favor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vosunda Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 38 minutes ago, Thomas Meagher said: You guys should come after KT, we're harboring the evil @Vosunda after all. Bring your little myriad of raid raid targets alliance mates with ya. Hell you guys probably won't even need TKR, we're war virgins too. We've only ever warred micros to boot. Not too different than you guys, actually. But who doesn't dig a level playing field? Aside from IQ, of course. Guys I only come when summoned. That being said... I wouldn't really call it a level playing field. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiki Mod Dr Rush Posted February 22, 2018 Wiki Mod Share Posted February 22, 2018 10 hours ago, Rache Olderen said: I would say more like realistic. Unless you are suggesting that while fighting a three front war against you, AO, and IoM we should open up yet another front or simply declare on anyone we possibly can thus overextending our forces and getting us bogged down in way too many wars is a good idea. Which if so I must question your strategic genius, which while I am sure is dynamic, seems to be overlooking a few things. But I see your point. We will need to get the Rollinator 9000 ready to go then. Or start that Rolling Stone Crusade I was calling for against BK when our plans to roll them were leaked last year. Preserving for posterity. Right here we have an IQ leader saying that trying to fight more then 50 nations with over 400 would be an over extension for them. 12 hours ago, Rache Olderen said: Keep in mind IoM declared on us. So I will get back to you on that when I read Guardian's DoW. And said same leader doesn't know the difference between a Recognition of War and a deceleration of war. Thats kinda sad. 2 hours ago, Tuanduy1102 said: "Countered" Oh boy. Sure, if you attack 1 nation for attacking your alliance, we would acknowledge that action as a counter attack. Please recheck IoM's war activity and see what they did when "counter", by declaring over 20 wars, with only 3 against the original attacker. And for that CB, Qora from Owr and Taco from Zodiac only hit Arnout and no one else, and Qora even peace out. There's no justification for IoM's actions. I know you've never been exposed to a competent alliance before, but this is what competent alliances do when a member is attacked. If the attackers alliance leadership doesn't make them stop after trying diplomacy, its effectively an act of war by their alliance as a whole and should be treated as such. 4 Quote 23:38 Skable that's why we don't want Rose involved, so we can take the m all for ourselves 23:39 [] but Mensa is the cute girl at the school dance and she's only dancing with us right now to get our friend jealous 23:39 [] If Rose comes in and gives Mensa what she wants, she'll just toss us aside and forget we ever existed 23:39 zombie_lanae yeah I do hope we can keep having them all to ourselves 23:40 zombie_lanae I know it's selfish but I want all their love 6:55 PM <+Isolatar> Praise Dio Pubstomper|BNC [20:01:55] Rose wouldn't plan a hit on Mensa because it would be !@#$ing stupid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rache Olderen Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 (edited) 16 hours ago, Dr Rush said: Preserving for posterity. Right here we have an IQ leader saying that trying to fight more then 50 nations with over 400 would be an over extension for them. And said same leader doesn't know the difference between a Recognition of War and a deceleration of war. Thats kinda sad. I know you've never been exposed to a competent alliance before, but this is what competent alliances do when a member is attacked. If the attackers alliance leadership doesn't make them stop after trying diplomacy, its effectively an act of war by their alliance as a whole and should be treated as such. Not an IQ leader so try again mate, I just do Economics. Let me just clarify where you seem to be deluding yourself from reality. IoM's leader went into another alliance to hit us, we hit him back. Then IoM hit the rest of us. It would be like if I went into Lordaeron and hit, say Patrick Higgins, and then I dragged the rest of CS into war against Higgin's alliance for something I did when members of said alliance hits me back. Oh wait, I did in fact hit Higgins while in Lordaeron and I fully expected to be hit back but wouldn't have dragged my alliance through it so nevermind. Regardless they are recognizing hostilities that they caused because their leader decided to hit us Edited February 22, 2018 by Rache Olderen Quote 2nd, 4th, and 6th Adelphotes Princeps of Cornerstone, Ambassador to Black Knights, 4th Grand Pilus of Cornerstone, 2nd Chaplain of Cornerstone, 5th Questor Princeps of Cornerstone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ripper Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 1 hour ago, Rache Olderen said: Not an IQ leader so try again mate, I just do Economics. Let me just clarify where you seem to be deluding yourself from reality. IoM's leader went into another alliance to hit us, we hit him back. Then IoM hit the rest of us. It would be like if I went into Lordaeron and hit, say Patrick Higgins, and then I dragged the rest of CS into war against Higgin's alliance for something I did when members of said alliance hits me back. Oh wait, I did in fact hit Higgins while in Lordaeron and I fully expected to be hit back but wouldn't have dragged my alliance through it so nevermind. Regardless they are recognizing hostilities that they caused because their leader decided to hit us Hit the rest of the alliances that sent ghosts then. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taco Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 (edited) 21 hours ago, Partisan said: I've seen the logs. It was made very clear that there was no peace to be had. Good on IoM for standing up for itself. Arnout said very clearly *twice* that he would love to attack some more of us. After he said that, why would I consider to offer peace? Edited February 22, 2018 by Taco Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Scarfalot Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 1 hour ago, Taco said: Arnout said very clearly *twice* that he would love to attack some more of us. After he said that, why would I consider to offer peace? Because you and your allies are getting rekt? Seems like a good idea for you to ask for peace, let alone 'offer' it. Maybe you thought that IoM were easy loot, but they're more competent than you thought. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefonteen Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 2 hours ago, Taco said: Arnout said very clearly *twice* that he would love to attack some more of us. After he said that, why would I consider to offer peace? Is that why you offered peace after you realized IoM suicide-fricked into you with 30 wars? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Betulius Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 2 hours ago, Taco said: Arnout said very clearly *twice* that he would love to attack some more of us. After he said that, why would I consider to offer peace? Because I've said similar of literally every alliance? Quote Dec 26 18:48:22 <JacobH[Arrgh]> God your worse the grealind >.> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insert Name Here Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 (edited) Don't mind me. I'm just waiting on IQ to (as they've done with IoM) attack KT, Guardian and CoS for having members ghosting Terminal Jest. Maybe also SK and Durmstrang for having members ghosting Arrgh. IQ seem like a coherent and brave bunch, I'm sure they're gonna do it. Edited February 23, 2018 by Insert Name Here 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taco Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 (edited) 51 minutes ago, Partisan said: Is that why you offered peace after you realized IoM suicide-fricked into you with 30 wars? 1 hour ago, Sir Scarfalot said: Because you and your allies are getting rekt? Seems like a good idea for you to ask for peace, let alone 'offer' it. Maybe you thought that IoM were easy loot, but they're more competent than you thought. IoM's Total Military: Total Soldiers: 130,586 Total Tanks: 38 Total Aircraft: 1,293 Total Ships: 52 Total Missiles: 1 Total Nuclear Weapons: 0 IoM's Members: Vacation Mode Members: 2 (8.7%) Beige Nations: 14 (66.67%) Gray Nations: 1 (4.76%) IoMs Score: Now i know facts don't fly here on these forums, but i am a taco, and i don't fly either! Edited February 23, 2018 by Taco 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insert Name Here Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 For shame, Imperium of Man... How dare you not do better when you clearly outnumber the opposition? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Scarfalot Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Taco said: blah blah blah BK stats: Vacation Mode Members:5 (4.27%) Beige Nations:15 (13.39%) Gray Nations:16 (14.29%) Zodiac stats: Vacation Mode Members:4 (4.17%) Beige Nations:5 (5.43%) Gray Nations:10 (10.87%) Cornerstone stats: Vacation Mode Members:1 (1.85%) Beige Nations:12 (22.64%) Gray Nations:5 (9.43%) That's 14 beige IoM to 32 beige IQ, and I've only looked at three of your alliances. Sure, IoM isn't responsible for all of those, but they're responsible for several, many of them against your own counters. More telling is the lack of vaca mode IoM compared to all the vaca mode IQ. You are literally losing. Getting beiged by TJ is bad enough, but now you are getting beiged by a paperless, war virgin micro. Edited February 23, 2018 by Sir Scarfalot 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insert Name Here Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 1 minute ago, Sir Scarfalot said: BK stats: Vacation Mode Members:5 (4.27%) Beige Nations:15 (13.39%) Gray Nations:16 (14.29%) Zodiac stats: Vacation Mode Members:4 (4.17%) Beige Nations:5 (5.43%) Gray Nations:10 (10.87%) Cornerstone stats: You can't possibly demand decent stats from such a clear underdog though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Scarfalot Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 2 minutes ago, Insert Name Here said: You can't possibly demand decent stats from such a clear underdog though. I suppose that's true. IQ surrender when? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insert Name Here Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 Just now, Sir Scarfalot said: I suppose that's true. IQ surrender when? I mean, just because they're few and the odds are heavily stacked against them, that doesn't mean they wanna surrender. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.