Jump to content
Delacroix

Purple rain, a Rose gardener’s Dream come true

Recommended Posts

 

1Ap8xiYMoL7Sl0ZOu0vZZOveN3HfAX1iIJQw5YaprgRsbXvDSpCUPmh6AgzwSy4I_2mdo2MYInDP1wNKvrE_jZQU86Re9NJwm7t6ClqypiRNbKN8Skny3AhVJbFCp6de42e5hd3hl2K9EEm5wfDOkKeTgiRYZeeRQUp0OBM0h5_bnAquA59BXxF8gh92mgUOy-wqmXObUV45uBKkb4uEoRqC1Ksps559UrTx-RF9SlweUnpW9Y9BwqcR0FWokdFoiv7iNnZ0ERfC-s69

Article One - White + Purple ≠ Red

The Order of the White Rose and The United Empire of Zah'Aharon, hereby referred to as "the Parties," recognize each other as sovereign entities and agree to not declare war upon any of the other party's member-nations, nor to partake in espionage of any kind against the other. Any incident that breaches this clause will be sorted out in a private and timely fashion for as long as the treaty stands.

Article Two - To the Last Leaf

The Parties are obligated to aid each other in an event of a Declaration of War against either party unless discussed otherwise. Neither party is obligated to join an offensive war.

Article Three - Common Gardens

The Parties are obligated to share any information received (that relates to/with the other party) with the other party's leadership, through secure channels.


Article Four - Pruning the Gardens

Should either party wish to withdraw from the treaty, they hold the right to withdraw whenever they desire with the following condition. The withdrawing party must give the other a notice of 72 hours. The treaty is to remain active up until the last moment of these hours upon which the treaty and by extension its clauses will become null and void.

 

Signed for OWR

Prime - Sval
Prime Regent - Monkeybutt
Legate of Foreign Affairs - Delacroix
Legate of Internal Affairs - Kabu
Proconsul of Potatoes - Axios
Proconsul of Awesome - Luis

 

Signed for TUE,

Empress Therana, Founder of the Empire
Empress Alexia, Keeper of the Realm
Advisor Hydraik, the Weeaboo
Lord Roose Bolton, Lord of Foreign Affairs
Lord De_Quan, Lord of Internal Affairs
Lord Curtis III, Lord of Econ
Lord Lorhill, Supreme Commanders

  • Upvote 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Congrats Mr. Potato head

 

Hav fun being flower friends, potato pals, budding buddies, a herd of oxen that have evolved to create and utilize weapons of mass destruction

and all the other terms for garden gangs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone pleeeeeease explain to me why a micro needs more paper despite having basically 50 protectors and 50 MDPs?

Image result for burning paper gif

Anyways, grats on making more paper and polluting Orbis :(

  • Upvote 5
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, evilpiggyfoofoo said:

treaties r no bueno 

But they don’t do anything, if u attack people with treaties then the new targets come to u

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, evilpiggyfoofoo said:

Can someone pleeeeeease explain to me why a micro needs more paper despite having basically 50 protectors and 50 MDPs?

Image result for burning paper gif

Anyways, grats on making more paper and polluting Orbis :(

Not quite sure who you mean. Don't see anyone it might apply to. Please try again later 

 

o7 For the Empire! 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Delacroix said:

-Purple rain, a Rose gardener’s Dream come true-

You scared me...

I thought Rose upgraded its treaty with UPN from Protection to MDP.

Edit: @Keegoz great minds think alike...

Edited by Ripper
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, evilpiggyfoofoo said:

Can someone pleeeeeease explain to me why a micro needs more paper despite having basically 50 protectors and 50 MDPs?

Image result for burning paper gif

Anyways, grats on making more paper and polluting Orbis :(

Hmm

TUE: 0 protectors + 3 treaties + this one = 4

OWR: 0 protectors + 8 treaties - 4 NAPS + this one = 5

Yes i see what you mean by 50 protectors and 50 treaties

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, hydraik said:

TUE: 0 protectors + 3 treaties + this one = 4

OWR: 0 protectors + 8 treaties - 4 NAPS + this one = 5

Yes i see what you mean by 50 protectors and 50 treaties

I fail to see a difference...

 

On an aside, the numbers you listed conveniently equal 100, so yes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

a semi-decent alliance (TUE) signs a pretty mediocre one (OWR)

shame

:shrug:

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I was still in charge of Rose I'd roll you over these treaty titles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, durmij said:

If I was still in charge of Rose I'd roll you over these treaty titles.

No you wouldn’t.

Congrats guys on a treaty that will never be used. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Hope said:

a semi-decent alliance (TUE) signs a pretty mediocre one (OWR)

shame

:shrug:

I agree. What the hell kind of weak shit is this?

As former Emperor of TUE, I am ashamed of this...
I expected... more... from you guys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, durmij said:

If I was still in charge of Rose I'd roll you over these treaty titles.

You'd have lost.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Partisan said:

You'd have lost.

I don't know man; with a cause as worthy as his, the very idea of 'losing' shouldn't apply. People need to start going to war over these things, or else we'll all be subjected to more consolidation, pixel hugging, and worst of all, crap treaty titles.

Tl;dr: why don't you prove it, huh?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Sir Scarfalot said:

I don't know man; with a cause as worthy as his, the very idea of 'losing' shouldn't apply. People need to start going to war over these things, or else we'll all be subjected to more consolidation, pixel hugging, and worst of all, crap treaty titles.

Tl;dr: why don't you prove it, huh?

I am but a bystander, making observations based on precedent. Who are you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Partisan said:

I am but a bystander, making observations based on precedent. Who are you?

I'm a guy that's worked to make the game playable and active since I joined, you're a guy that's making noises without actually causing game drama.

I'm asking you to put your pixels where your mouth is. Will you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Sir Scarfalot said:

I'm a guy that's worked to make the game playable and active since I joined, you're a guy that's making noises without actually causing game drama.

I'm asking you to put your pixels where your mouth is. Will you?

 

I'm never one to decline an e-peen measuring contest, as evident by certain nominations in particular yearly awards.

What exactly have you done to make the game playable and active since you joined? Do you really want to compare histories?

Edited by Partisan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Partisan said:

 

I'm never one to decline an e-peen measuring contest, as evident by certain nominations in particular yearly awards.

What exactly have you done to make the game playable and active since you joined? Do you really want to compare histories?

Tell me, then; why are you avoiding taking action? Hit me, hit Rose, do anything other than sit and consolidate. I don't care what you've done in the past; if you take prior accomplishments as reasons to sit on laurels then you are part of the problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Sir Scarfalot said:

Tell me, then; why are you avoiding taking action? Hit me, hit Rose, do anything other than sit and consolidate. I don't care what you've done in the past; if you take prior accomplishments as reasons to sit on laurels then you are part of the problem.

What have I consolidated exactly? As far as i'm aware, i've made very recent overtures to "start drama", despite a numerically inferior position (as well as a political disadvantage), when I certainly could have simply leveraged my historic relations with "Easy Mode (at the time Syndisphere)" to  simply create a cozy spot in a solidified hegemoney for myself.

 

I didn't, and instead opted for a route that risked the alienation of friends and allies whom i'd grown rather familiar and close with, for no other reason than OOC entertainment. The latest gimmick backfired, and that's fine, all part of the game. Does not take away from the attempt though ;).

I digress. You are deflecting. What have you done exactly to make the game more active and better? I'm intrigued.

Edited by Partisan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.