Jump to content

Remove No Discussion Rule


Donald Trump
 Share

Recommended Posts

Your whole alliance is !@#$ing stupid, but no one says anything about that now do they, so if you could shut the actual !@#$ up, that'd be greeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your whole alliance is !@#$ stupid, but no one says anything about that now do they, so if you could shut the actual !@#$ up, that'd be greeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaat. 

Such an intelligent response from one calling another person stupid. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ia. pls allow constructive, on topic discussion. e.g. presenting arguments but not necessarily comments like "ya i agree"

 

Your whole alliance is !@#$ stupid, but no one says anything about that now do they, so if you could shut the actual !@#$ up, that'd be greeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaat.

lmao are u ok?? do u need a hug?? some chocolate??

dx8jLp8.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have the sniffles right now, allergies are bad

Holy shit, absolutely this 2^3295%. I legit haven't been able to hear out of my left ear for almost a week now, even taking prescription strength allergy medicine. 

NODOLsmall.png.a7aa9c0a05fa266425cd7e83d8ccb3dd.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because it's !@#$ stupid. 

 

What I think is !@#$ing stupid is that so many people can't seem to get through their head what a NDF is, or don't care what it is and post anyway. If anything, the warns for this needs to be enforced better, as well as harsher punishments.

 

While I'm all for comedic posts that make us all laugh, it's not appropriate in a NDF, and just wastes mod's time.

 

As another suggestion, perhaps make the game/forums section of the forums where only mods and the person who made the report can view the thread. It's easier than having to police and issue so many warns for people posting in a NDF and will protect people who made a report from being targeted in-game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(linking posts because the thread is locked and I can't quote)

 

I'd be open to the idea of absolutely serious posts being allowed, such as:

https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?/topic/19334-trolling-flaming-name-calling-forum-rule-violations-and-national-law-violation/?p=324400

https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?/topic/19334-trolling-flaming-name-calling-forum-rule-violations-and-national-law-violation/?p=324410

https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?/topic/19334-trolling-flaming-name-calling-forum-rule-violations-and-national-law-violation/?p=324421

 

What I don't think should be allowed are jokes and one-liners, such as:

https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?/topic/19334-trolling-flaming-name-calling-forum-rule-violations-and-national-law-violation/?p=324331

https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?/topic/19334-trolling-flaming-name-calling-forum-rule-violations-and-national-law-violation/?p=324336

https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?/topic/19334-trolling-flaming-name-calling-forum-rule-violations-and-national-law-violation/?p=324337

https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?/topic/19334-trolling-flaming-name-calling-forum-rule-violations-and-national-law-violation/?p=324338

https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?/topic/19334-trolling-flaming-name-calling-forum-rule-violations-and-national-law-violation/?p=324341

https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?/topic/19334-trolling-flaming-name-calling-forum-rule-violations-and-national-law-violation/?p=324355

https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?/topic/19334-trolling-flaming-name-calling-forum-rule-violations-and-national-law-violation/?p=324371

https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?/topic/19334-trolling-flaming-name-calling-forum-rule-violations-and-national-law-violation/?p=324373

https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?/topic/19334-trolling-flaming-name-calling-forum-rule-violations-and-national-law-violation/?p=324401

 

With that said, I expect this would create more problems than it solves. Take these posts, for example, that could fall in between:

https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?/topic/19334-trolling-flaming-name-calling-forum-rule-violations-and-national-law-violation/?p=324334

https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?/topic/19334-trolling-flaming-name-calling-forum-rule-violations-and-national-law-violation/?p=324343

https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?/topic/19334-trolling-flaming-name-calling-forum-rule-violations-and-national-law-violation/?p=324346

 

This isn't even covering random clutter posts of people agreeing or disagreeing with no actual content provided.

 

I'm sure looking through those, you disagreed on some of my groupings, and that's the point. Deciding between the categories above will often be subjective on the moderation team's part, inevitably leading to the usual crew making callout threads and accusations of moderation bias. Regardless of the validity of these accusations, this always happens.

 

Lastly,

 

NauticalExcellentGnu.gif

 

Edited by Kurdanak
  • Upvote 1
xzhPlEh.png?1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

This subforum is for game (mechanic) suggestions, not forum suggestions. Take this to Mod Support.

 

To save you some time, I'll just let you know that I'm not going to remove the rule.

  • Upvote 1

Is there a bug? Report It | Not understanding game mechanics? Ask About It | Got a good idea? Suggest It

Forums Rules | Game Link

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.