Pangui Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 https://politicsandwar.com/alliance/id=622 lol 1001 Days, and still kicking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
durmij Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 https://politicsandwar.com/alliance/id=622 lol 14 percent Les Paul. Impressive. Quote https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjI4ROuPyuY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUUEHv8GHcE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buorhann Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=9524 https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=32794 https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=35330 Lol. Oh, nice! Good job on that. Keep it up please. 1 Quote Warrior of Dio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfPCFQfOnLg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisyphus Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 1001 Days, and still kicking. "kicking" Quote One must imagine Sisyphus happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mad Titan Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 At a certain point, there isn't anything left for us to destroy that does significant damage. If IQ sees that as the tides turning in your favor, well okay then If it's so bad for us, why would anyone end the war? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buorhann Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 If it's so bad for us, why would anyone end the war? I mean, we're not. We have a big surplus of resources, might as well spend it and see how this down declare stuff works out. It'll also (hopefully) finally show how stupid this game is by keeping Air so dominate for as long as it has been, seeing as how it's literally the most used military unit in the game (and has been), as well as cheaper in resources than Ships and arguably Tanks (At least in expending Munitions/Fuel for the same amount of damage). 1 Quote Warrior of Dio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfPCFQfOnLg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beowulf the Second Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 (edited) If it's so bad for us, why would anyone end the war? -Alpha flashbacks- You would end the war because it got boring. Can't convince your coalition to stay with you if the effort is pointless. Small groups can maintain suppression: Alpha managed to internally keep their morale and justify a bottom-tier mudsling fest under the reasoning that even if they weren't making any money, Syndi was making decreased money and their allies could perhaps get ahead. I guess if y'all are willing to stay down we have no choice but to keep going anyways despite reasons to stop Also it's bad manners tbh EDIT: realized he meant us, tweaked it a little Edited May 3, 2017 by Beowulf the Second Quote 01:58:39 <BeowulftheSecond> Belisarius of The Byzantine Empire has sent your nation $0.00, 0.00 food, 0.00 coal, 0.00 oil, 0.00 uranium, 0.00 lead, 0.00 iron, 0.00 bauxite, 0.00 gasoline, 0.00 munitions, 1,000.00 steel, and 0.00 aluminum from the alliance bank of Rose.01:58:46 <BeowulftheSecond> someone please explain 01:59:12 <%Belisarius> sleep deprivatin is a !@#$ @_@01:59:14 — %Belisarius shrugs01:59:18 <BeowulftheSecond> we're at WAR. WE ARE BURNING EACH OTHER'S PIXELS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harrison Richardson Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 I will have you know that MENSA is currently having a long running debate over lifting technique, dieting, and routines on our forums. Do we even lift? Pppft, MENSA both overthinks and at the same time under-thinks basic, banal life tasks like lifting. It's what we were born to do. Quote ☾☆ And Dio said unto him, "I trust you. Share my word." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mad Titan Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 It'll also (hopefully) finally show how stupid this game is by keeping Air so dominate for as long as it has been, seeing as how it's literally the most used military unit in the game (and has been), as well as cheaper in resources than Ships and arguably Tanks (At least in expending Munitions/Fuel for the same amount of damage). That we can agree on. Planes need rebalancing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadowthrone Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 That we can agree on. Planes need rebalancing. More power must be given to the almighty Roqboat. As he leads out to see. Praise to L Roq Hubbard and his wonderful Church! All hail the Roqboats. Now if Sheepy joined us in making the Roqboat the ultimate military weapon, it will truly benefit everybody! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anneal Posted May 4, 2017 Share Posted May 4, 2017 I mean, we're not. We have a big surplus of resources, might as well spend it and see how this down declare stuff works out. It'll also (hopefully) finally show how stupid this game is by keeping Air so dominate for as long as it has been, seeing as how it's literally the most used military unit in the game (and has been), as well as cheaper in resources than Ships and arguably Tanks (At least in expending Munitions/Fuel for the same amount of damage). A big requested change for planes is to nerf the damage it does when you target tanks and ships, which is a reason why air is so dominant over other units. Also, the fortify option, which is a bit irritating. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemal Ergenekon Posted May 4, 2017 Share Posted May 4, 2017 https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=9524 https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=32794 https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=35330 Lol. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemal Ergenekon Posted May 4, 2017 Share Posted May 4, 2017 Double post because why not. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Placentica Posted May 4, 2017 Share Posted May 4, 2017 (edited) Small groups can maintain suppression: Alpha managed to internally keep their morale and justify a bottom-tier mudsling fest under the reasoning that even if they weren't making any money The biggest reason we kept fighting was to make it clear that an attack on Alpha wouldn't be a short war, but a prolonged nukefest. I think that point was made effectively. Plus we had enough resources to keep nuking and most of us were really enjoying the updeclare nukings from low infra. As for this war, I'd be interested to see a nation count and score that includes only the Syndi-TKR side that was in range of the Inq side now. Or maybe downdeclare plus 500-1000 score for sell-downs. I think that number is a big reason why peace/reps hasn't happened. Edited May 4, 2017 by Placentica Quote Hello! If you don't like this post please go here: https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?app=core&module=usercp&tab=core&area=ignoredusers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaceman Thrax Posted May 4, 2017 Share Posted May 4, 2017 I think the problem with comparing this war to the Alpha conflict is that Alpha was able to annoy and stall the growth of about 3-4 times the nations that they had. In this war the lower tier meatgrinder, which is probably not making great income while holding military units and improvements, actually outnumbers the nations they're pinning. Quote Slaughter the shits of the world. They poison the air you breathe. ~ William S. Burroughs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcKnox Posted May 4, 2017 Share Posted May 4, 2017 Meanwhile in the 4000+ score tier 4 Quote Praise Dio. Every !@#$ing day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pangui Posted May 4, 2017 Share Posted May 4, 2017 I think the problem with comparing this war to the Alpha conflict is that Alpha was able to annoy and stall the growth of about 3-4 times the nations that they had. In this war the lower tier meatgrinder, which is probably not making great income while holding military units and improvements, actually outnumbers the nations they're pinning. Another difference is that Alpha wasn't zeroing out militaries and then keeping those nations pinned. This isn't war quite like we've seen before. It certainly hasn't been an easy task, and at this point we still have lost more, but this side has definitely made progress in at least keeping this competitive. Which is a lot more than we can say for the third and fourth rounds of previous wars. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaceman Thrax Posted May 4, 2017 Share Posted May 4, 2017 Another difference is that Alpha wasn't zeroing out militaries and then keeping those nations pinned. This isn't war quite like we've seen before. It certainly hasn't been an easy task, and at this point we still have lost more, but this side has definitely made progress in at least keeping this competitive. Which is a lot more than we can say for the third and fourth rounds of previous wars. True about Alpha. I was thinking of it more in terms of damage. Alpha was able to do way more damage in terms of infra to larger nations, but couldn't pin those nations. IQ is keeping nations pinned, but can't really damage them anymore. Both of those are "damage" in the economic sense. In terms of it being competitive... I never saw it that way. I see it as two not-competitive conflicts happening in the same war. Quote Slaughter the shits of the world. They poison the air you breathe. ~ William S. Burroughs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micchan Posted May 4, 2017 Share Posted May 4, 2017 You really believe that? The T-Rex in this case would also be very much in danger. We are using only the heavily damaged nations while the upper tier is almost intact and can produce enough to sustain the entire alliance You side has all the nations in the low and mid tier with low infra and busy with wars, no one is producing and everyone is consuming resources, one day the bank will be empty Submarine warfare is good only if you are waiting for help that can hit the enemy in the upper tier 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eumirbago Posted May 4, 2017 Share Posted May 4, 2017 I just wanna see which AA in IQ will lose a !@#$ton of their members. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buorhann Posted May 4, 2017 Share Posted May 4, 2017 I just wanna see which AA in IQ will lose a !@#$ton of their members. Both sides are losing members. I know a couple Zodiac guys got annoyed and left. 1 Quote Warrior of Dio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfPCFQfOnLg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eumirbago Posted May 4, 2017 Share Posted May 4, 2017 (edited) Both sides are losing members. I know a couple Zodiac guys got annoyed and left. It is tradition that when the sphere wins an alliance on the other side loses ~30% or more of their membership. Please continue it and remind these fools not to start shit before they're ready, or else we get people like Restius who will cry because arrangements were not made for them. Edited May 4, 2017 by Jacob Moore Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JOEYY Posted May 4, 2017 Share Posted May 4, 2017 Yazzzz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senry Posted May 4, 2017 Share Posted May 4, 2017 The real winners will be NPO. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micchan Posted May 4, 2017 Share Posted May 4, 2017 The real winners will be NPO. The real winner is Roq, all his nations are in the low tier with no income, exactly as he wants Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.