Jump to content

Sweden, Germany and the death of the west


Bunyip
 Share

Recommended Posts

Not my responsibility. Right-wing terrorism is on the rise and kills people. Left-wing terrorist sometimes results in property damage killing no one. You don't seem to understand or care about the difference which is on you, not me.

Hmm,despite the smack you've said in the past,I have to admit that your argument about right wing terror has some solid foundation behind it.

"If a person is satisfied with everything,then he is a complete idiot.A normal person cannot be satisfied with everything."~Vladimir Putin

 

"Every human being makes mistakes."~Ian Smith

 

We do not know what tomorrow will bring. We are not prophets. This is a step in the dark. We can only proceed into the future with faith.~Pieter Wilhelm Botha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A left wing riot/protest does not require everyone attending the riot/protest to be demonstrating,the fact is,these protests advocate a leftist cause and can therefore be considered,leftist.Just like the anti-gun control protests carried out by conservatives (and by your wild logic,leftists).

 

Protests advocating a leftist cause since 2016

 

1.http://www.nydailynews.com/amp/news/national/protests-prompt-cancellation-calif-college-wing-event-article-1.2962069

 

2.http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/anti-trump-riots-erupt-cities-9664176.amp

 

3.https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2017/01/30/politics/travel-ban-protests-immigration/index.html

 

These are just the largest ones ^^^

I see absolutely no problem with them. Just as I said you can see the ones doing damage are wearing all black to identify with each other who's there to protest and who's tagging along to just wreck stuff.

 

 

Hmm,despite the smack you've said in the past,I have to admit that your argument about right wing terror has some solid foundation behind it.

Wow, I don't think I've ever heard someone change their mind about something argued on the internet. Kudos to you.

GICjEwp.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Here you go, buddy:

 

On November 27, 2015, a mass shooting occurred in a Planned Parenthood clinic in Colorado Springs, Colorado, resulting in the deaths of three people and injuries to nine.[1][2] A police officer and two civilians were killed; five police officers and four civilians were injured.[3][4] After a standoff that lasted five hours,[1][5] police SWAT teams crashed armored vehicles into the lobby and the attacker surrendered.[6]

The attacker, Robert Lewis Dear, Jr., was taken into custody and charged three days later with first-degree murder and ordered held without bond. At a December 9 court appearance, Dear repeatedly interrupted proceedings, made statements affirming his guilt (although he did not enter a formal plea), and expressed anti-abortion and anti-Planned Parenthood views, calling himself "a warrior for the babies." He appeared in court again on December 23, and asserted his desire to act as his own attorney in the criminal case against him. The judge ordered a mental competency evaluation to assess whether Dear is sufficiently competent to exercise his right to do so. Following subsequent evaluations that determined Dear to be delusional, the judge in the case ruled in May 2016 that Dear was incompetent to stand trial and ordered him indefinitely confined to a Colorado state mental hospital.

 

 

The issue talked about is terrorist groups. He is not a member of a terrorist group so it doesn't count. 

 

Right wing terrorism is usually lone wolf unaffiliated work. Left wing terrorism is usually the work of a affiliated group. As such left wing terrorist groups are more a worry than right wing groups though it is true there are unaffiliated right wing terrorists out there. Though it should be noted what is or isn't right or left can be murky as many of these terrorist attacks are done for singular issues and not simply ideology. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, I don't think I've ever heard someone change their mind about something argued on the internet. Kudos to you.

Thanks for the sarcasm

Edited by Vincent de Beer

"If a person is satisfied with everything,then he is a complete idiot.A normal person cannot be satisfied with everything."~Vladimir Putin

 

"Every human being makes mistakes."~Ian Smith

 

We do not know what tomorrow will bring. We are not prophets. This is a step in the dark. We can only proceed into the future with faith.~Pieter Wilhelm Botha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The issue talked about is terrorist groups. He is not a member of a terrorist group so it doesn't count. 

 

Right wing terrorism is usually lone wolf unaffiliated work. Left wing terrorism is usually the work of a affiliated group. As such left wing terrorist groups are more a worry than right wing groups though it is true there are unaffiliated right wing terrorists out there. Though it should be noted what is or isn't right or left can be murky as many of these terrorist attacks are done for singular issues and not simply ideology. 

Did it take very long to dig up the goalposts to move them? The FBI certainly thinks the right-wing is far more dangerous.

 

Thanks for the sarcasm

That was genuine praise, seriously.

GICjEwp.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did it take very long to dig up the goalposts to move them? The FBI certainly thinks the right-wing is far more dangerous.

 

Look back and you'll see the goal posts were very clear. I was very clear every time to note terrorist groups as left wing terrorist groups were what had been brought up, you had protested, and then stated that right wing groups were worse. By all accounts that appears false and will you now admit that? Come on. I of course acknowledge that is right wing terrorists and they are an issue certainly, though as I said, bit murky labelling someone a right wing terrorist if religion or some other thing is involved. Interestingly enough due to that murkiness is why you get some places referring to Islamic attacks as right wing terrorism. Its all too easy when so murky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Conservative riots happen, usually over guns

I hope you mean "peaceful protests." If there was a "riot" over firearm bans, I'm sure the bodies in the streets would be on every news channel after every shooting. 

 

 

 

dk4TuF6.jpg

UgrRG9C.jpg

ZccNIhQ.jpg

 

 

NODOLsmall.png.a7aa9c0a05fa266425cd7e83d8ccb3dd.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roz has a very specific nitpick. He's saying right-wing "groups" are less dangerous then left-wing "groups". Any evidence of right-wing terrorsits, like Tim McVeigh, doesn't actually proove him wrong unless they were part of a group that planned it.

 

My worries about right-wing groups are the alt-right militias and "sovereign citizens". But so far, I don't have a list of attacks prooving their danger. I think Roz is correct that most right-wing terrorists are acting on their own.

Edited by Aisha Greyjoy

Duke of House Greyjoy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nah, I'm done being your Google. Look for yourself if you like.

Search results for "gun control riot"

 

1. Betsy Riot gun control group encourages attacks on gun owners

2. Gun Control Supporters Are Just This Nasty And Threatening

3. Riot control - Wikipedia

4. Riot gun - Wikipedia

5. Starving Socialist Country With Food Riots Launches Gun Control ...

6. Gun Control in the Age of Riots - Political Forum

7. Gun control in the US is not a fantasy - Al Jazeera English

8. Oakland...Gun Controls...Anti-Trump Riots...Police Can't Help

9. Gun Control Sure Isn't Helping "Charm City" | The Daily Caller

10. Do you think gun control in the UK is a good thing? Have the riots ...

 

People also ask

What is a riot gun?

What is riot control?

What are riot shells?

What is the shortest shotgun barrel that is legal?

  • Upvote 1

NODOLsmall.png.a7aa9c0a05fa266425cd7e83d8ccb3dd.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow so many of you are so [email protected]#$ racist. I'm not saying that anyone who doesn't believe in globalism or anyone who is right wing or republican or conservative is racist, but some of these posts on this thread are just...

Edited by Golen IV

This is very small

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow so many of you are so [email protected]#$ racist. I'm not saying that anyone who doesn't believe in globalism or anyone who is right wing or republican or conservative is racist, but some of these posts on this thread are just...

 

and?

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow so many of you are so [email protected]#$ racist. I'm not saying that anyone who doesn't believe in globalism or anyone who is right wing or republican or conservative is racist, but some of these posts on this thread are just...

What exactly did you see that was racist? 

IpHGyGc.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luckily if Australia only funds defense and law enforcement they'll be unable to stop the influx of refugees.

I still can't find any gun control riots. I went to the tenth page of Google and even used Bing. 

 

Search results for "gun control riot"

 

1. Betsy Riot gun control group encourages attacks on gun owners

2. Gun Control Supporters Are Just This Nasty And Threatening

3. Riot control - Wikipedia

4. Riot gun - Wikipedia

5. Starving Socialist Country With Food Riots Launches Gun Control ...

6. Gun Control in the Age of Riots - Political Forum

7. Gun control in the US is not a fantasy - Al Jazeera English

8. Oakland...Gun Controls...Anti-Trump Riots...Police Can't Help

9. Gun Control Sure Isn't Helping "Charm City" | The Daily Caller

10. Do you think gun control in the UK is a good thing? Have the riots ...

 

People also ask

What is a riot gun?

What is riot control?

What are riot shells?

What is the shortest shotgun barrel that is legal?

NODOLsmall.png.a7aa9c0a05fa266425cd7e83d8ccb3dd.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BUT WAIT...according to Milton's own words,these people aren't protesters,they're just morons tagging along breaking stuff (and there haven't even been any conservative riots in a long time) so problem solved

"If a person is satisfied with everything,then he is a complete idiot.A normal person cannot be satisfied with everything."~Vladimir Putin

 

"Every human being makes mistakes."~Ian Smith

 

We do not know what tomorrow will bring. We are not prophets. This is a step in the dark. We can only proceed into the future with faith.~Pieter Wilhelm Botha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You literally have no evidence...your claims of the right rioting often are BS,just like your claim that reganomics failed,and now when asked for evidence,you refuse,unless you have any evidence and you stop denying facts,you should just stop,because there's nothing to debate anymore.

Edited by Vincent de Beer

"If a person is satisfied with everything,then he is a complete idiot.A normal person cannot be satisfied with everything."~Vladimir Putin

 

"Every human being makes mistakes."~Ian Smith

 

We do not know what tomorrow will bring. We are not prophets. This is a step in the dark. We can only proceed into the future with faith.~Pieter Wilhelm Botha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BUT WAIT...according to Milton's own words,these people aren't protesters,they're just morons tagging along breaking stuff (and there haven't even been any conservative riots in a long time) so problem solved.

Yes. If you get a good picture of the group involved in the process of destroying property I can probably identify them relatively easily

 

You literally have no evidence...your claims of the right rioting often are BS,just like your claim that reganomics failed,and now when asked for evidence,you refuse,unless you have any evidence and you stop denying facts,you should just stop,because there's nothing to debate anymore.

They're not BS at all. Reaganomics failed. It's why no competent economist uses them. I'm fine staying, thanks.

GICjEwp.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. If you get a good picture of the group involved in the process of destroying property I can probably identify them relatively easily

 

They're not BS at all. Reaganomics failed. It's why no competent economist uses them. I'm fine staying, thanks.

Since there have been no massive right wing riots for a long time,I'll just let that slide.So if reganomics failed,why did the American economy magically rise during and after the reganomics policies were used? I guess China isn't turning to reganomics.

 

"Reganomics failed"

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reaganomics

 

That proves you're pulling crap out of your arse

Edited by Vincent de Beer

"If a person is satisfied with everything,then he is a complete idiot.A normal person cannot be satisfied with everything."~Vladimir Putin

 

"Every human being makes mistakes."~Ian Smith

 

We do not know what tomorrow will bring. We are not prophets. This is a step in the dark. We can only proceed into the future with faith.~Pieter Wilhelm Botha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But hey,if the president is right wing,they're always gonna fail in everything (despite history and numbers showing otherwise)

"If a person is satisfied with everything,then he is a complete idiot.A normal person cannot be satisfied with everything."~Vladimir Putin

 

"Every human being makes mistakes."~Ian Smith

 

We do not know what tomorrow will bring. We are not prophets. This is a step in the dark. We can only proceed into the future with faith.~Pieter Wilhelm Botha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luckily if Australia only funds defense and law enforcement they'll be unable to stop the influx of refugees.

You understand border patrol is a law enforcement agency, right? Entering the country without permission is illegal?

 

Not like the refugees will bother travelling all the way to Australia to seek asylum anyway, they'll get killed by the greatest wall in the world - the ocean. We're half a world away ffs. Do you understand the idiocy of your statement?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since there have been no massive right wing riots for a long time,I'll just let that slide.So if reganomics failed,why did the American economy magically rise during and after the reganomics policies were used? I guess China isn't turning to reganomics. It didn't. It increased in value with the expansion of Internet access to consumers and Clinton's aggressive moves to balance the budget. All outside of the Reaganomics nightmare of wrongness.

 

"Reganomics failed"

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reaganomics

 

That proves you're pulling crap out of your arse No, it does prove you're willing to do anything to believe you're right, facts or no facts.

 

 

But hey,if the president is right wing,they're always gonna fail in everything (despite history and numbers showing otherwise) Usually or we'll remove all that shit when we're back in office.

 

 

You understand border patrol is a law enforcement agency, right? Entering the country without permission is illegal? You have such a big coastline to defend. If ind it hard to believe you can cover it all with almost no revenue.

 

Not like the refugees will bother travelling all the way to Australia to seek asylum anyway, they'll get killed by the greatest wall in the world - the ocean. We're half a world away ffs. Do you understand the idiocy of your statement? They took boats there before you kept them off the continent in storage. That means they can and have done exactly what you claim they can't.

GICjEwp.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have such a big coastline to defend. If ind it hard to believe you can cover it all with almost no revenue.

 

who says a flat 14% tax rate for citizens and corporations isn't enough to fund military and law enforcement? id say its more than enough. Remember, the Australian military budget is a much lower percentage than the American one, so dont get confused - our military size right now is laughable. 

 

They took boats there before you kept them off the continent in storage. That means they can and have done exactly what you claim they can't.

 

boat people arent refugees, they are economic migrants from places like Indonesia, Vietnam etc, not places like Syria or Afghanistan. They did come to Australia because there was no legislation saying that they couldnt come until the Howard government pushed for tighter border security, particularly in the waters. People were smuggled into Australia by black market dealers, not because they sought refuge. They did come until we said they couldnt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.