hadesflames Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 What were you doing (or trying to do): Looking at AA bank What happened (describe thoroughly please): If an applicant loses a war, the bank of the AA they are a mere applicant to gets looted. Link to page: Unnecessary Any other relevant information: N/A Screenshot: (if available) http://i.imgur.com/MCPtZtH.png All of those loots are against applicants. None were members when they had were declared on them, or indeed at any point in time. Bank was looted anyway. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callum Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 (edited) isnt that intentional? (To prevent abusing it.) If you dont want applicants draining your bank. kick them. Edited December 30, 2016 by Callum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Alex Posted December 30, 2016 Administrators Share Posted December 30, 2016 That isn't what's supposed to happen, I'll check it out. Probably something I overlooked when re-writing looting. 3 Is there a bug? Report It | Not understanding game mechanics? Ask About It | Got a good idea? Suggest ItForums Rules | Game Link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dabawss Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 What were you doing (or trying to do): Looking at AA bank What happened (describe thoroughly please): If an applicant loses a war, the bank of the AA they are a mere applicant to gets looted. Link to page: Unnecessary Any other relevant information: N/A Screenshot: (if available) http://i.imgur.com/MCPtZtH.png All of those loots are against applicants. None were members when they had were declared on them, or indeed at any point in time. Bank was looted anyway. Alex, this was just brought to my attention too. someone had ongoing raids against a nation when that nation then applied to become a member to my alliance. They are still an applicant and my alliance's bank show payouts to the people who beiged him. I reinterate, the applicant had raids ongoing on them BEFORE they applied to become an member... the applicant is still just an applicant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dabawss Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 That isn't what's supposed to happen, I'll check it out. Probably something I overlooked when re-writing looting. will the looted alliances get their looted money and resources back when this is fixed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Alex Posted December 30, 2016 Administrators Share Posted December 30, 2016 will the looted alliances get their looted money and resources back when this is fixed? Probably not, unless it's a really significant amount. Is there a bug? Report It | Not understanding game mechanics? Ask About It | Got a good idea? Suggest ItForums Rules | Game Link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hadesflames Posted December 30, 2016 Author Share Posted December 30, 2016 If you dont want applicants draining your bank. kick them. 1 - An applicant can get attacked before we can boot. Then the bank gets looted even after we kick because the loot comes from AA they were in when attacked, not when defeated. 2 - I can't wait to abuse this bug by sending people to apply to SK so we can loot your bank. I reported it, so I'll be immune. Oh, no you probably don't like that right? Right. It's a bug. Piss off. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woot Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 will the looted alliances get their looted money and resources back when this is fixed? Probably not, unless it's a really significant amount. Damn, I was going to use this on Bubblegum's bank if it was an intended change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanek26 Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 Probably not, unless it's a really significant amount. Define significant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Alex Posted December 30, 2016 Administrators Share Posted December 30, 2016 Define significant. Make your case. If you can convince me it's a significant amount, I would be willing to return the resources. But generally alliance bank loot is very little, and nothing that will be missed by a large alliance. Is there a bug? Report It | Not understanding game mechanics? Ask About It | Got a good idea? Suggest ItForums Rules | Game Link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanek26 Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 Make your case. If you can convince me it's a significant amount, I would be willing to return the resources. But generally alliance bank loot is very little, and nothing that will be missed by a large alliance. I lost 1.3 million dollars to this. With 1.3 million dollars, I could have bought 1.04 million soldiers. Are 1.04 million soldiers insignificant? I think not! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Alex Posted December 30, 2016 Administrators Share Posted December 30, 2016 I lost 1.3 million dollars to this. With 1.3 million dollars, I could have bought 1.04 million soldiers. Are 1.04 million soldiers insignificant? I think not! Compared to your bank contents, we're looking at 0.063778639% or so. Which, in my opinion, is not very significant. 3 Is there a bug? Report It | Not understanding game mechanics? Ask About It | Got a good idea? Suggest ItForums Rules | Game Link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanek26 Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 Compared to your bank contents, we're looking at 0.063778639% or so. Which, in my opinion, is not very significant. I was clearly joking. Also don't post our bank contents plox. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inwegen Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 Compared to your bank contents, we're looking at 0.063778639% or so. Which, in my opinion, is not very significant. You really are the densest admin I've ever seen. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeachBunny Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 (edited) Holy shit are you just seriously brain dead Edited December 31, 2016 by BeachBunny 1 ☾☆ Priest of Dio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spooner Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 [sensible kek] ☾☆ High Priest of Dio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordRahl2 Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 You really are the densest admin I've ever seen. Well, I saw one worse before. That game is dead. Alex can you now modify our bank upwards a significant, and undisclosed, amount to undo the significant damage you did by revealing our bank holdings? Thanks in advance. -signature removed for rules violation- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemal Ergenekon Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bhuto Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 Compared to your bank contents, we're looking at 0.063778639% or so. Which, in my opinion, is not very significant. errr @alex posting private info is not good though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donald Trump Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 Compared to your bank contents, we're looking at 0.063778639% or so. Which, in my opinion, is not very significant. Did you just leak Mensa's bank to the world? You're a moron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avruch Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 errr @alex posting private info is not good though Alex is the owner of a game that surpassed CyberNations in active users; he knows what he is doing, OK? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yui MHCP001 Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 Jesus Christ he's worse than the worst eRepublik Admin. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PackAnimal Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 1 Mans two modes of existence can be thought of as his light and dark side. He is either the Protector or the Ravager. The Immovable Object or the Unstoppable Force. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sailor Jerry Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 I lost 1.3 million dollars to this. With 1.3 million dollars, I could have bought 1.04 million soldiers. Are 1.04 million soldiers insignificant? I think not! Compared to your bank contents, we're looking at 0.063778639% or so. Which, in my opinion, is not very significant. Lmfao that's gold That is some of the funniest shit I've seen in some time now.....thanks Alex for making my day.....and this war, a little enjoyable! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donald Trump Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 Don't question Sheep's genius. He's far smarter then you, you're just too dumb to realize it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts