Ole Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 The game isn't about getting into the top 10 while that is a goal for some alliances it's usually means sacrificing quality for quantity. You saying our quality is lacking? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kastor Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 I'm not sure where merging came into the conversation, but I was referring to the difference between the difficulty in starting an alliance in the beta vs now. I was also talking about more than just fending for themselves from a military POV, but also growth too. And of course it comes over time, that was my point. Alliances are heavily established now vs the beta, so much so its impossible to grow competitively without either joining or getting support from one of the current alliances. That wasn't the case in the beta. No, in beta you got raided a ton more You saying our quality is lacking? I will make TEst great again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bhuto Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 Well please save some spot for me kastor and sketchy and let me congratulate Night's Watch first Well although I am not that much old but I feel it is a bit tough to attract new nations at this point for small alliances like let me be honest when I selected my first alliance I looked at the scores and also at that time there was not that much huge difference in score as it is now.Like differnce between number 1 and number 10 is more than 200k and number 2 / 3 and number 10 is nearly 100k like hardly there will be any active new player who will be pleased with this much score difference and join new alliances with scores almost 10 times less. More over all old alliances have a huge amount of money and resource already in their bank so their grants will be much more effective than the new alliances.So the main point is yes it is a bit hard for the new alliances to grow according to me. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InternationWar Posted October 28, 2016 Author Share Posted October 28, 2016 Well please save some spot for me kastor and sketchy and let me congratulate Night's Watch first Well although I am not that much old but I feel it is a bit tough to attract new nations at this point for small alliances like let me be honest when I selected my first alliance I looked at the scores and also at that time there was not that much huge difference in score as it is now. Like differnce between number 1 and number 10 is more than 200k and number 2 / 3 and number 10 is nearly 100k like hardly there will be any active new player who will be pleased with this much score difference and join new alliances with scores almost 10 times less. More over all old alliances have a huge amount of money and resource already in their bank so their grants will be much more effective than the new alliances. So the main point is yes it is a bit hard for the new alliances to grow according to me. Thank You for explaining it so well! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurdanak Posted October 28, 2016 Share Posted October 28, 2016 (edited) Good luck and have fun, Night's Watch! Right now is the easiest time to ever create a new alliance in the history of the game. Not sure what you're complaining about.I don't know, when we founded the GPA over here a century or two ago it was pretty easy. But, you know, there also wasn't any war function implemented yet. Edited October 28, 2016 by Kurdanak Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.