Syndicate Declaration of Actually Making Declarations

[Brooklyn666]

[snip] We figured this out

 

Exclusive leaked photos of tS "figuring it out"

 

Edited September 11, 2016 by Brooklyn666

[Valdoroth]

... no missiles, no nukes...

 

Next war, no aircraft.

10/10 would war again.

[Prefontaine]

[Callum]

Yeah i'm confused. 

 

You could have easily said !@#$ this and not done anything. Not hit SK, had a morale high ground if someone declared on you. all that jazz.

 

But you attacked with.. well nothing.  Why? you could have last minute bought a round of ground forces, then another after turn over. but.. 

 

 

I just... i dont understand. Tell me you have some crazy master plan. 

Edited September 11, 2016 by Callum

[Roy Mustang]

Yeah i'm confused. 

 

You could have easily said !@#$ this and not done anything. sat out this war. had a morale high ground if someone declared on you. all that jazz.

 

But you attacked with.. well nothing.  Why? you could have last minute bought a round of ground forces, then another after turn over. but.. 

 

 

I just... i dont understand. Tell me you have some crazy master plan. 

 

Uh, you do realize that Mikey already admitted that y'all were planning to preempt us over in your thread, right?

 

Sitting out wasn't an option (not that we would have availed ourselves of the option even if it was, but still).

 

Sort of a silly argument to trot out.

[Katie]

[Callum]

Mikey isnt Gov. 

 

But for old friends sake, We had no intention of hitting a former friend and ally with no CB. nor did we have a reason to believe you were to hit us.

The only scenario that SK was going to pre-empt tS was if we had undeniable proof that you were going to hit us. We didnt believe you were going to. 

 

So i guess GG, im still surprised. 

[Spaceman Thrax]

Mikey isnt Gov. 

 

But for old friends sake, We had no intention of hitting a former friend and ally with no CB. nor did we have a reason to believe you were to hit us.

The only scenario that SK was going to pre-empt tS was if we had undeniable proof that you were going to hit us. We didnt believe you were going to. 

 

So i guess GG, im still surprised. 

 

Uhm.

 

From: Valdoroth Date: 09/10/2016 Saturday 11:35 pm

So it seems you beat me by about 20 minutes to posting war. Applauds to you.

 

 

 

 

[Roy Mustang]

Mikey isnt Gov. 

 

But for old friends sake, We had no intention of hitting a former friend and ally with no CB. nor did we have a reason to believe you were to hit us.

The only scenario that SK was going to pre-empt tS was if we had undeniable proof that you were going to hit us. We didnt believe you were going to. 

 

So i guess GG, im still surprised. 

 

Refer to Manthrax's post. I couldn't be bothered to drag out PMs when there was public proof. 

 

That being said, I don't mind that you hit us. It was expected that we'd be at war once Rose hit our ally, truth be told. Stop trying to act like we would have been left alone if we sat on our hands, though - that clearly was not the case.

[Insert Name Here]

Ssssspectacular!

 

 

 

Ooh, Partisan is all dressed up tonight! He gon' get snek lucky.

[Callum]

The majority of your current conflicts seem to be a direct result of hitting SK. had you not done so.  You would have more time to prepare for whatever came your way. had you only declared on VE. Who SK "technically" isnt Allied with. i feel like that gamble would have been wiser than whatever you want to call this pre-empt. 

 

 

 

I'm going to guess Banter on Vals part. "Damn you beat us to it" seems pretty innocent. 

 

 

^{_{Edit: I fixed my previous post, as i worded it wrong.}}

Edited September 11, 2016 by Callum

[MrsPigeon]

The majority of your current conflicts seem to be a direct result of hitting SK. had you not done so.  You would have more time to prepare for whatever came your way. had you only declared on VE. Who SK "technically" isnt Allied with. i feel like that gamble would have been wiser than whatever you want to call this pre-empt. 

 

 

 

I'm going to guess Banter on Vals part. "Damn you beat us to it" seems pretty innocent. 

 

 

^{_{Edit: I fixed my previous post, as i worded it wrong.}}

I think you need to reevaluate you're war competency if you think having ground forces is important in a blitz

[Bilal the Great]

Boy I better be active on P&W again, it's been months.

 

*sees war*

 

Ooh yes can't wait to bash some purp-

 

*sees who are we warring with*

 

MRW

[Spaceman Thrax]

I'm going to guess Banter on Vals part. "Damn you beat us to it" seems pretty innocent. 

 

 

 

No.

 

The thing I quoted was your leader saying he planned to hit us, which is what you said you wouldn't do. One or both of you is lying, and poorly.

[Callum]

I think you need to reevaluate you're war competency if you think having ground forces is important in a blitz

So only being able to use 66% of your Air force is a good strategy?

 

 

ok. sure. why not? 

[Callum]

No.

 

The thing I quoted was your leader saying he planned to hit us, which is what you said you wouldn't do. One or both of you is lying, and poorly.

And i said that seems like innocent banter.  

 

Im not sure how tS runs things, but In SK we do majority vote. And whether you chose to believe me or not. the majority decided against a unprovoked pre-empt. 

because we'd look like !@#$ who simply left your sphere to hit you.  

 

So for what its worth. thanks. You've certainly made this easier. 

[Cody K]

I'm going to guess Banter on Vals part. "Damn you beat us to it" seems pretty innocent. 

 

So you're honestly going to try and argue that we should disregard comments from your fellow members because they "aren't government." However, when your King confirms what they're saying you're going to claim it's just innocent banner. Come on, Callum. 

[BeachBunny]

I have been looking for a new pair of flip flops

[MrsPigeon]

So only being able to use 66% of your Air force is a good strategy?

 

 

ok. sure. why not?

 

I'm looking at a tS nation with 1400 air at the same ns of an SK nation with 600 air.

 

Do you fail to see my point?

 

Also, SK posted their DoW 4 minutes after tS so am I missing something?

Edited September 11, 2016 by Piratemonkey

[Callum]

Do you fail to see my point?

Yes.

 

 

 

Also, SK posted their DoW 4 minutes after tS so am I missing something?

Notice the lack of scroll? and well. everything.  

[Sargun]

Notice the lack of scroll? and well. everything.  

 

Either you or your king are either lying or incompetent.  Want to bet on who I think is doing what right now?

[Roy Mustang]

Yes.

 

If you still miss the point then I'm feeling pretty good right now. Keep missing the point, Military Commander of the Opposition

[MrsPigeon]

Yes.

 

 

Notice the lack of scroll? and well. everything.

 

So is your King lying in the other thread about wanting to pre-empt tS?

[Callum]

We're only in the first leg. If it works out as well as your expecting, then congrats to you. But i personally see it as far too much of a gamble.

 

At 66% that 1400 is only 924. while against that particular nation. is still pretty good. that 500 just doing nothing seems like a giant waste.

[Doktor Avalanche]