Placentica Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 The alliances of Alpha and Cornerstone have agreed to white peace. For the duration of this current conflict, neither alliance will engage in any spy attacks or new wars against each other. For the purpose of this agreement there is no distinction between an attack that is a defined as a raid or one that is part of a broader war.Signed Alpha,Placentica, DriverJames II, HybridGreatnate, IronHope Solo, IronSigned for Cornerstone,Grand Pilus – AristidePost Pilus – BeowulfLegatus Princeps – Wall1515Adelphotes Princeps – RacheQuaestor Princeps – ZigbigadorlouPraesidium Princeps – PiastActa Scientiae Princeps - RestiusCornerstone Knights of the Senate Quote Hello! If you don't like this post please go here: https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?app=core&module=usercp&tab=core&area=ignoredusers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James II Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 Congrats CS. Didn't get a chance to fight you personally, but glad to see fair peace for everyone! Quote "Most successful new AA" - Samuel Bates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Filthy Fifths Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 what about peace with t$? Quote "In an honest service there is thin commons, low wages, and hard labor; in this, plenty and satiety, pleasure and ease, liberty and power; and who would not balance creditor on this side, when all the hazard that is run for it, at worst, is only a sour look or two at choking. No, a merry life and a short one, shall be my motto." - Bartholomew "Black Bart" Roberts Green Enforcement Agency will rise again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisyphus Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 what about peace with t$?All in due time. Quote One must imagine Sisyphus happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franz Von Dietrich Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 (edited) The alliances of Alpha and Cornerstone have agreed to white peace. For the duration of this current conflict, neither alliance will engage in any spy attacks or new wars against each other. For the purpose of this agreement there is no distinction between an attack that is a defined as a raid or one that is part of a broader war. Signed Alpha, Placentica, Driver James II, Hybrid Greatnate, Iron Hope Solo, Iron Signed for Cornerstone, Grand Pilus – Aristide Post Pilus – Beowulf Legatus Princeps – Wall1515 Adelphotes Princeps – Rache Quaestor Princeps – Zigbigadorlou Praesidium Princeps – Piast Acta Scientiae Princeps - Restius Cornerstone Knights of the Senate No. Just kidding, anyways congratulations to achieving peace. Edited June 24, 2016 by Comrade Enver Hoxha 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Placentica Posted June 24, 2016 Author Share Posted June 24, 2016 Best of luck CS! It was a good fight with you guys and our guys enjoyed having a bit more fun on the conventional side of war as a departure from the last 50 days or so of nuke war. I really appreciate your class in peace negotiations. Thank you for being so polite and easy to work with! 2 Quote Hello! If you don't like this post please go here: https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?app=core&module=usercp&tab=core&area=ignoredusers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lordship Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 Congratulations on peace guys! o/ Quote Life before Death. Strength before Weakness. Journey before Destination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DVDCCHN Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 congrats on your peace CS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zigbigadorlou Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 2 Quote Hey Krampus, the signature edit is under account settings. Actually, here's the link. https://forum.politicsandwar.com/index.php?/settings/signature/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tali Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 Congratulations Cornerstone! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerys Targaryen Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 (edited) Cornerstone o/ Edited June 24, 2016 by Aerys Targaryen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Prefontaine Posted June 24, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted June 24, 2016 I'll laugh when it's CS who attacks them in 60 days. NO NAP?!?!? 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeachBunny Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 YAY Quote ☾☆ Priest of Dio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fistandantilus Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 The alliances of Alpha and Cornerstone have agreed to white peace. For the duration of this current conflict, neither alliance will engage in any spy attacks or new wars against each other. For the purpose of this agreement there is no distinction between an attack that is a defined as a raid or one that is part of a broader war. Signed Alpha, So now Steve says raids and wars are defined differently...When it involves his own AA, interesting XD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caecus Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 So now Steve says raids and wars are defined differently...When it involves his own AA, interesting XD You are implying that Steve has a double standard regarding that? Quote It's a useful mental exercise. Through the years, many thinkers have been fascinated by it. But I don't enjoy playing. It was a game that was born during a brutal age when life counted for little. Everyone believed that some people were worth more than others. Kings. Pawns. I don't think that anyone is worth more than anyone else. Chess is just a game. Real people are not pieces. You can't assign more value to some of them and not others. Not to me. Not to anyone. People are not a thing that you can sacrifice. The lesson is, if anyone who looks on to the world as if it was a game of chess, deserves to lose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sans Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 Congratz on peace Quote “ Life before death. Strength before weakness. Journey before destination. †–The First Ideal of the Windrunners, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rache Olderen Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 Best of luck CS! It was a good fight with you guys and our guys enjoyed having a bit more fun on the conventional side of war as a departure from the last 50 days or so of nuke war. I really appreciate your class in peace negotiations. Thank you for being so polite and easy to work with! It was nice to actually fight someone since BK was all over Sparta and most of our lower tier wasn't in range. So yeah I enjoyed it myself because I could actually participate in this war. And our lower tiers probably appreciate having an opponent too (saves me from being asked who they can hit when I can just say "Fight everyone in Alpha you can fight.") So yes it was good and best of luck to Alpha. Quote 2nd, 4th, and 6th Adelphotes Princeps of Cornerstone, Ambassador to Black Knights, 4th Grand Pilus of Cornerstone, 2nd Chaplain of Cornerstone, 5th Questor Princeps of Cornerstone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James II Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 So now Steve says raids and wars are defined differently...When it involves his own AA, interesting XD huh? Quote "Most successful new AA" - Samuel Bates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Placentica Posted June 24, 2016 Author Share Posted June 24, 2016 So now Placentica says raids and wars are defined differently...When it involves his own AA, interesting XD I really have no idea how you came to this conclusion. But I suggest you go back an re-read what it actually says. The agreement states just the opposite of what you think it says. there is no distinction between an attack that is a defined as a raid or one that is part of a broader war. In fact the reason this is included is precisely because people like you seem to think a raid is not a war and a war doesn't have elements of raiding involved at times. So to make extra sure that no one tried to exploit, what you find to be a loophole, I asked for this additional clarification to be included. Quote Hello! If you don't like this post please go here: https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?app=core&module=usercp&tab=core&area=ignoredusers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greatnate Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 o/ CS Always fun to fight someone new. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fistandantilus Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 (edited) On another thread, said by Steve: Your word and any agreement you sign is now viewed as worthless by the majority of alliances here, if not all of them who read this topic. Sure there are some, who you are fighting for, that won't tell you this to your face. But everyone is thinking it and most of us are laughing about it. And in the future you will find out what that really means and the permanent ramifications. What you said about Arrgh using the definition of raiding to be diferent then war. The OP: For the purpose of this agreement there is no distinction between an attack that is a defined as a raid or one that is part of a broader war.Signed Alpha, "For the purpose of this agreement there is no distinction between an attack that is a defined as a raid or one that is part of a broader war" That inherently means that there is a difference, which is inconsistent to what you said about Arrgh I would also like to point out how you cut out the "For the purpose of this agreement" to change the meaning to just "there is no distinction between an attack that is a defined as a raid or one that is part of a broader war" in your recent reply. The line segment "For the purpose of this agreement" when connected to the whole affirms that there is a difference between raiding and War in this document, posted by Steve. Interesting how you left that one out in your quote though Edited June 24, 2016 by Fistandantilus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greatnate Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 On another thread, said by Steve: What you said about Arrgh using the definition of raiding to be diferent then war. The OP: "For the purpose of this agreement there is no distinction between an attack that is a defined as a raid or one that is part of a broader war" That inherently means that there is a difference, which is inconsistent to what you said about Arrgh I would also like to point out how you cut out the "For the purpose of this agreement" to change the meaning to just "there is no distinction between an attack that is a defined as a raid or one that is part of a broader war" in your recent reply. The line segment "For the purpose of this agreement" when connected to the whole affirms that there is a difference between raiding and War in this document, posted by Steve. Interesting how you left that one out in your quote though "For the purpose of this agreement" acknowledges that not all parties to the agreement hold the same views as Alpha. We do view raiding and warring as one and the same, there is no incongruity. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fistandantilus Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 (edited) "For the purpose of this agreement" acknowledges that not all parties to the agreement hold the same views as Alpha. We do view raiding and warring as one and the same, there is no incongruity. It doesn't acknowledge that though, and you guys signed something that says "For the purpose of this agreement there is no distinction between an attack that is a defined as a raid or one that is part of a broader war" "defined as a raid or one that is part of a broader war". Both parties agreed that raids and wars are different by definition and to count them as the same, then signed it. You guys very well may see raiding/war as the same, but that's not what Steve posted and what you guys signed, and I found it funny. I didn't think this would be such a big deal or need me to explain it in such detail XD Edited June 24, 2016 by Fistandantilus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greatnate Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 It doesn't acknowledge that though, and you guys signed something that says "For the purpose of this agreement there is no distinction between an attack that is a defined as a raid or one that is part of a broader war" "defined as a raid or one that is part of a broader war". Both parties agreed that raids and wars are different by definition and to count them as the same, then signed it. You guys very well may see raiding/war as the same, but that's not what Steve posted and what you guys signed, and I found it funny. I didn't think this would be such a big deal or need me to explain it in such detail XD No it acknowledges that one party of the agreement may and members of the international community may regard raiding as not warring. We do not. I don't know why you have such difficulty accepting that. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan the Red Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 Looks like Steve's volatile standards are bitting him in the back in yet another thread. Congratulations on peace, CS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.