Jump to content
Placentica

Alpha - Cornerstone Announcement

Recommended Posts

The alliances of Alpha and Cornerstone have agreed to white peace. For the duration of this current conflict, neither alliance will engage in any spy attacks or new wars against each other. For the purpose of this agreement there is no distinction between an attack that is a defined as a raid or one that is part of a broader war.

Signed Alpha,

Placentica, Driver
James II, Hybrid
Greatnate, Iron
Hope Solo, Iron

Signed for Cornerstone,

Grand Pilus – Aristide
Post Pilus – Beowulf
Legatus Princeps – Wall1515
Adelphotes Princeps – Rache
Quaestor Princeps – Zigbigadorlou
Praesidium Princeps – Piast
Acta Scientiae Princeps - Restius
Cornerstone Knights of the Senate

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Congrats CS. Didn't get a chance to fight you personally, but glad to see fair peace for everyone!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The alliances of Alpha and Cornerstone have agreed to white peace. For the duration of this current conflict, neither alliance will engage in any spy attacks or new wars against each other. For the purpose of this agreement there is no distinction between an attack that is a defined as a raid or one that is part of a broader war.

 

Signed Alpha,

 

Placentica, Driver

James II, Hybrid

Greatnate, Iron

Hope Solo, Iron

 

Signed for Cornerstone,

 

Grand Pilus – Aristide

Post Pilus – Beowulf

Legatus Princeps – Wall1515

Adelphotes Princeps – Rache

Quaestor Princeps – Zigbigadorlou

Praesidium Princeps – Piast

Acta Scientiae Princeps - Restius

Cornerstone Knights of the Senate

No.

 

Just kidding, anyways congratulations to achieving peace.

Edited by Comrade Enver Hoxha
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Best of luck CS!  It was a good fight with you guys and our guys enjoyed having a bit more fun on the conventional side of war as a departure from the last 50 days or so of nuke war.  :)

 

I really appreciate your class in peace negotiations.  Thank you for being so polite and easy to work with!  :wub:

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cornerstone o/

Edited by Aerys Targaryen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The alliances of Alpha and Cornerstone have agreed to white peace. For the duration of this current conflict, neither alliance will engage in any spy attacks or new wars against each other. For the purpose of this agreement there is no distinction between an attack that is a defined as a raid or one that is part of a broader war.

 

Signed Alpha,

 

 

 

So now Steve says raids and wars are defined differently...When it involves his own AA, interesting XD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So now Steve says raids and wars are defined differently...When it involves his own AA, interesting XD

 

You are implying that Steve has a double standard regarding that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratz on peace

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Best of luck CS!  It was a good fight with you guys and our guys enjoyed having a bit more fun on the conventional side of war as a departure from the last 50 days or so of nuke war.  :)

 

I really appreciate your class in peace negotiations.  Thank you for being so polite and easy to work with!  :wub:

It was nice to actually fight someone since BK was all over Sparta and most of our lower tier wasn't in range. So yeah I enjoyed it myself because I could actually participate in this war. And our lower tiers probably appreciate having an opponent too (saves me from being asked who they can hit when I can just say "Fight everyone in Alpha you can fight.") :) So yes it was good and best of luck to Alpha. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So now Steve says raids and wars are defined differently...When it involves his own AA, interesting XD

huh?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So now Placentica says raids and wars are defined differently...When it involves his own AA, interesting XD

I really have no idea how you came to this conclusion.  But I suggest you go back an re-read what it actually says.  The agreement states just the opposite of what you think it says.

 

there is no distinction between an attack that is a defined as a raid or one that is part of a broader war.

In fact the reason this is included is precisely because people like you seem to think a raid is not a war and a war doesn't have elements of raiding involved at times.  So to make extra sure that no one tried to exploit, what you find to be a loophole, I asked for this additional clarification to be included.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On another thread, said by Steve:


Your word and any agreement you sign is now viewed as worthless by the majority of alliances here, if not all of them who read this topic.

 

Sure there are some, who you are fighting for, that won't tell you this to your face.  But everyone is thinking it and most of us are laughing about it.  And in the future you will find out what that really means and the permanent ramifications.

 

What you said about Arrgh using the definition of raiding to be diferent then war.

 

The OP:

For the purpose of this agreement there is no distinction between an attack that is a defined as a raid or one that is part of a broader war.

Signed Alpha,

 

 

"For the purpose of this agreement there is no distinction between an attack that is a defined as a raid or one that is part of a broader war"

 

That inherently means that there is a difference, which is inconsistent to what you said about Arrgh

 

I would also like to point out how you cut out the "For the purpose of this agreement" to change the meaning to just "there is no distinction between an attack that is a defined as a raid or one that is part of a broader war" in your recent reply. The line segment "For the purpose of this agreement" when connected to the whole affirms that there is a difference between raiding and War in this document, posted by Steve. Interesting how you left that one out in your quote though :P

Edited by Fistandantilus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On another thread, said by Steve:

 

What you said about Arrgh using the definition of raiding to be diferent then war.

 

The OP:

 

"For the purpose of this agreement there is no distinction between an attack that is a defined as a raid or one that is part of a broader war"

 

That inherently means that there is a difference, which is inconsistent to what you said about Arrgh

 

I would also like to point out how you cut out the "For the purpose of this agreement" to change the meaning to just "there is no distinction between an attack that is a defined as a raid or one that is part of a broader war" in your recent reply. The line segment "For the purpose of this agreement" when connected to the whole affirms that there is a difference between raiding and War in this document, posted by Steve. Interesting how you left that one out in your quote though :P

 

"For the purpose of this agreement" acknowledges that not all parties to the agreement hold the same views as Alpha. We do view raiding and warring as one and the same, there is no incongruity.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"For the purpose of this agreement" acknowledges that not all parties to the agreement hold the same views as Alpha. We do view raiding and warring as one and the same, there is no incongruity.

 

 It doesn't acknowledge that though, and you guys signed something that says "For the purpose of this agreement there is no distinction between an attack that is a defined as a raid or one that is part of a broader war"

 

"defined as a raid or one that is part of a broader war". Both parties agreed that raids and wars are different by definition and to count them as the same, then signed it.

 

You guys very well may see raiding/war as the same, but that's not what Steve posted and what you guys signed, and I found it funny.

 

I didn't think this would be such a big deal or need me to explain it in such detail XD

Edited by Fistandantilus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 It doesn't acknowledge that though, and you guys signed something that says "For the purpose of this agreement there is no distinction between an attack that is a defined as a raid or one that is part of a broader war"

 

"defined as a raid or one that is part of a broader war". Both parties agreed that raids and wars are different by definition and to count them as the same, then signed it.

 

You guys very well may see raiding/war as the same, but that's not what Steve posted and what you guys signed, and I found it funny.

 

I didn't think this would be such a big deal or need me to explain it in such detail XD

 

No it acknowledges that one party of the agreement may and members of the international community may regard raiding as not warring. We do not. I don't know why you have such difficulty accepting that.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like Steve's volatile standards are bitting him in the back in yet another thread.

 

Congratulations on peace, CS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.