Ryleh Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 I don't think any of our other allies would back you up on that claim. Mainly since they are fighting us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hooves Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 Fight the good fight TKR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eumirbago Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 Mainly since they are fighting us. And would do it again if it's this easy lmfao 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaceman Thrax Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 (edited) I don't think any of our other allies would back you up on that claim. Whatever you put in to TKR, you get back double. If NPO had informed them over their plans openly (UPN hit them rather viciously last war, without a defensive trigger) rather than attempting to treat them as meat shields, this would have gone another way. They have continually went to bat for Pacifica in both this forum, and in back channels. They did not inform them. So the bits about violating the "spirit" of that treaty are way off. Edited June 15, 2016 by Manthrax 3 Quote Slaughter the shits of the world. They poison the air you breathe. ~ William S. Burroughs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floating Hippo Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 And would do it again if it's this easy lmfao I guess they didn't get the memo and joined the wrong sphere, should have checked the history of PnW and they would have seen how our side always tends to win these wars o/ We respect our allies over in NPO but yall just came in here not putting any respeck in our name. 1 Quote ^oo^ (..) () () ()__() Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boony Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 So I'm assuming that if the situation was reversed and TKR was targetting by NPO's allies in a war that will cause the rolling of all of NPO's allies besides TKR, NPO would stay neutral in order to honor the spirit of their treaty with TKR? Come on. I understand you're angry and you have every right to be, but you're trying to claim that TKR should behave like idiots and against their own interests in order to maintain the spirit of their treaty with NPO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auctor Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 To drive you out? We literally hit VE in defense of tS getting hit by VE. Shitty allies? Alright man sounds good, though I think everyone else that we are allied to would probably beg to differ. It just so happens that you, NPO, literally signed with nearly the entire opposite side of the web so we aren't in a position to be amazingly supportive of you. But that makes us shitty allies right? You put is in this position, expect us to let BK/tS get rolled, but we're shitty allies right? You slander our name on OOC forums but we're shitty allies rights? Lol please, BK and tS started an aggressive war against us and we *put you in this position*? Are you trying to convince yourself or someone else? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spooner Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 World war, here we go. Finally. Quote ☾☆ High Priest of Dio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auctor Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 So I'm assuming that if the situation was reversed and TKR was targetting by NPO's allies in a war that will cause the rolling of all of NPO's allies besides TKR, NPO would stay neutral in order to honor the spirit of their treaty with TKR? Come on. I understand you're angry and you have every right to be, but you're trying to claim that TKR should behave like idiots and against their own interests in order to maintain the spirit of their treaty with NPO. As a matter of fact - yes, we would honor our defensive treaty obligations over and above enabling our other allies to carry out an unwarranted aggressive war. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkiri Arch Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 Great job O/ Quote Officer Nasty reporting for duty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Bolivar Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 NPO feels "betrayed" because they have the notion that TKR "betrayed" them and instead have asked TKR to betray their other allies who they share NAPs with, "So basically, don't betray us, betray them!" as if that is meant to be in any way logical. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ezg Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 To drive you out? We literally hit VE in defense of tS getting hit by VE. Shitty allies? Alright man sounds good, though I think everyone else that we are allied to would probably beg to differ. It just so happens that you, NPO, literally signed with nearly the entire opposite side of the web so we aren't in a position to be amazingly supportive of you. But that makes us shitty allies right? You put is in this position, expect us to let BK/tS get rolled, but we're shitty allies right? You slander our name on OOC forums but we're shitty allies rights? Its hard to be the middle guy between two blocs. When they fight, one of them will get angry at you. You should just split your alliance in half and tell one to fight ts/bk and the other to attack npo. Then everyone is happy(or not). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DVDCCHN Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 much love to our knightly brothers 0/ to the good fight Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boony Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 As a matter of fact - yes, we would honor our defensive treaty obligations over and above enabling our other allies to carry out an unwarranted aggressive war. Oh okay, so NPO would allow all their allies to get rolled for the sake of one. Good to know for the future! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eumirbago Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 Its hard to be the middle guy between two blocs. When they fight, one of them will get angry at you. You should just split your alliance in half and tell one to fight ts/bk and the other to attack npo. Then everyone is happy(or not). or they can do what they did now and TKR can be happy pimpin gotta love dem gainz tho? have dey been using dat new whey formula? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boony Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 or they can do what they did now and TKR can be happy pimpin gotta love dem gainz tho? have dey been using dat new whey formula? ALL KINDS OF GAINS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auctor Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 Oh okay, so NPO would allow all their allies to get rolled for the sake of one. Good to know for the future!Numbers do not concern us. Doing the right thing does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eumirbago Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 Numbers do not concern us. Doing the right thing does. Yeeee rolling over is the right thing to do rn! The best way to help ur allies imo! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Lordship Posted June 15, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted June 15, 2016 1. Then perhaps they should have alerted their bloc mate to the fact that they were hitting an MD-level ally of TKR's before BK hit said ally. 2. You backstabbed NPO by ignoring the MD-level treaty you have with us. 3. Name the "other treaty" that would make Article 3 apply. 4. It's different because TKR is not defending NPO like you guys promised to in our treaty. t$ and BK hitting NPO was the opening declaration of a this war. NPO didn't come to anyone's defense or engage with anyone before t$ and BK 5. Because they promised to and their bloc apparently doesn't understand what "mutual defense" or "non-chaining" actually mean? 6. No. We want you to engage one or both of them because you promised to via our treaty. 7. I think the treaty with NPO makes a distinction between defense and aggression. See, if you go to war with someone because they attacked your MD ally, it's called defense. If your ally attacks someone and you join in, it's called aggression. Defending an ally doesn't break a non-aggression pact because it's not aggression. 1. You guys set yourselves up for this war, and BK made the most sense because of the way tiers play out. 2. Sooo many things wrong with this statement. Wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong. We didn't ignore the treaty, considering the only communication your government has had with us over the past few days is their ridiculous OOC forum slandering, associating TKR with MK, and calling us shit allies. 3. Non-chaining doesn't apply here since you were directly hit 4. We aren't defending you because your government hasn't bothered talking to us and the people hitting you are our long time allies who we hold treaties with. 5. Pretty sure we know what they mean? Not sure if trolling or 6. Right. You want us to engage our allies. Real intelligent decision, that would be. 7. Declaring war on them would not only be incredibly stupid, it would be political suicide. Any offensive declaration of war by any TKR nation on their nations would be considered aggression. Who would we have to fall back on? NPO who slander our name and sign the entire other side yet expect us to be the best friends in the world. 11 Quote Life before Death. Strength before Weakness. Journey before Destination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foltest Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 Numbers do not concern us. Doing the right thing does. Frawley does not approve Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boony Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 (edited) Numbers do not concern us. Doing the right thing does. So letting your other allies who also have treaties with you to be rolled is doing the right thing? This is also considering the fact that your treaty with them does not have a non chaining clause so you are obligated to defend them even if they are being aggressive. Edited June 15, 2016 by Boony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beowulf the Second Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 not going to concern myself with the specifics of this but, is it anything like the Alpha/t$ treaty situation from months ago? because then YOUR SIDE DID IT FIRST OAIDOIASHDIOASID LETS ALL BE CRYBABIES YOU SHOULD CONDEMN ALPHA FIRST BEFORE YOU GO FOR TKR or lets fight that's more fun Quote 01:58:39 <BeowulftheSecond> Belisarius of The Byzantine Empire has sent your nation $0.00, 0.00 food, 0.00 coal, 0.00 oil, 0.00 uranium, 0.00 lead, 0.00 iron, 0.00 bauxite, 0.00 gasoline, 0.00 munitions, 1,000.00 steel, and 0.00 aluminum from the alliance bank of Rose.01:58:46 <BeowulftheSecond> someone please explain 01:59:12 <%Belisarius> sleep deprivatin is a !@#$ @_@01:59:14 — %Belisarius shrugs01:59:18 <BeowulftheSecond> we're at WAR. WE ARE BURNING EACH OTHER'S PIXELS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eumirbago Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 So letting your other allies who also have treaties with you to be rolled is doing the right thing? This is also considering the fact that your treaty with them does not have a non chaining clause so you are obligated to defend them even if they are being aggressive. They weren't ready; frankly they were never ready lmfao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lordship Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 (edited) Lol please, BK and tS started an aggressive war against us and we *put you in this position*? Are you trying to convince yourself or someone else? Yeah, you did. You signed with UPN/VE/Alpha. You even slandered our name on the OOC forum because one of our members had a bad opinion of your second in command. You even tried to fish us for information when BK started arming up lmfao, I cannot believe I ever thought you had a solid head on your shoulders. Where is Jas when you need her? As a matter of fact - yes, we would honor our defensive treaty obligations over and above enabling our other allies to carry out an unwarranted aggressive war. Lmao this can be spun in so many ways based on the nature of the war. Are we not honoring our defensive treaty obligation by hitting VE? I honestly am baffled that you expect us to hit BK/tS who have had our backs in our whole year of existence. Also, our bloc supersedes all other treaties. NPO feels "betrayed" because they have the notion that TKR "betrayed" them and instead have asked TKR to betray their other allies who they share NAPs with, "So basically, don't betray us, betray them!" as if that is meant to be in any way logical. After today, I honestly don't think they know what that word means at this point. "logic" or they can do what they did now and TKR can be happy pimpin gotta love dem gainz tho? have dey been using dat new whey formula? THATS THAT DAMN PREGAINS, THAT DAMN BETAGAINS, THAT DAMN WHEYGAINS, GOT SOME SILVERBACK ACTION. WE BE MAKING ALL KINDS OF GAINS....all kinds Frawley does not approve We haven't interacted with Frawley at all other than like a line or two of text in IRC before we signed our treaty lmao Edited June 15, 2016 by Lordship 2 Quote Life before Death. Strength before Weakness. Journey before Destination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Yosodog Posted June 15, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted June 15, 2016 ITT people trying to smear TKR for defending their allies. I'll always love you guys TKR. You've proven to be loyal allies and great friends over the course of our relationship. 9 Quote [22:37:51] <&Yosodog> Problem is, everyone is too busy deciding which top gun character they are that no decision has been made BK in a nutshell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.