Natinator Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 The War of Veils Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WISD0MTREE Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 The Unnameable War Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemal Ergenekon Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 (edited) LordRahl2, sure went silent fast. It would be nice if he apologized for slandering Alpha. We are still waiting for your evidence regarding Mensa paying Arrgh to hit NPO, a lie which you spewed before last war. You keep ignoring posts that inconvenience you, but this does little to help your reputation. By know, everyone knows you are a chronic liar. Literally in the same thread, and you still do not apologize for your lies or acknowledge them. Pathetic. Edited June 30, 2016 by Kemal Ergenekon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Placentica Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 Right, so actually it was likely at least 2.8b a week if you include opportunity cost and actual costs together Is what you're saying. The $2.8b number wasn't referring to opp. cost, originally. What you did right here is just change the discussion. I won't call it a full derail, but instead of just admitting that number was way off (and lets be honest, it's laughably off), you've now tried to change the discussion. Despite that, if we had peaced out early, then rebuilt, then as you well know tS/BK hits NPO/UPN and we defend our allies like we do, then lose all the infra again.......you it would've been a negative opportunity cost when factoring in what we spent on rebuilding. So your point, while changing the discussion, is also wrong. And Alpha was 100% correct in assuming another war would break out very soon if we had peaced out tS out 30 days ago and rebuilt. What you just did here is like if I said "I make $35m a week." and you replied, "No you wrong, you make $100m if you count in 5 other Alpha members." And it seems like you constantly do this when the points I make are accurate and reasonable. I get that it's a common debate tactic, but it doesn't really serve any purpose and just leads me to believe you are just shitposting, no offense. But I'll let this go since I have no doubt you'll keep changing the discussion instead of trying to listen to what I'm saying. I think it's only people that have huge problems with me don't realize that I understand the economics of this game better than most and hence why Alpha had the funds to fight the way it did when no one expected we'd be able to. Failure to admit that just results in exchanges like this one, Phiney. Oh well, take care mate. I can respect the way Prefontaine handles TEst and the interesting moves he's made, even if we don't get along personally. Not showing respect, that is your right, but maybe it's time to put me on ignore. Quote Hello! If you don't like this post please go here: https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?app=core&module=usercp&tab=core&area=ignoredusers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefontaine Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 The $2.8b number wasn't referring to opp. cost, originally. What you did right here is just change the discussion. I won't call it a full derail, but instead of just admitting that number was way off (and lets be honest, it's laughably off), you've now tried to change the discussion. Despite that, if we had peaced out early, then rebuilt, then as you well know tS/BK hits NPO/UPN and we defend our allies like we do, then lose all the infra again.......you it would've been a negative opportunity cost when factoring in what we spent on rebuilding. So your point, while changing the discussion, is also wrong. And Alpha was 100% correct in assuming another war would break out very soon if we had peaced out tS out 30 days ago and rebuilt. What you just did here is like if I said "I make $35m a week." and you replied, "No you wrong, you make $100m if you count in 5 other Alpha members." And it seems like you constantly do this when the points I make are accurate and reasonable. I get that it's a common debate tactic, but it doesn't really serve any purpose and just leads me to believe you are just shitposting, no offense. But I'll let this go since I have no doubt you'll keep changing the discussion instead of trying to listen to what I'm saying. I think it's only people that have huge problems with me don't realize that I understand the economics of this game better than most and hence why Alpha had the funds to fight the way it did when no one expected we'd be able to. Failure to admit that just results in exchanges like this one, Phiney. Oh well, take care mate. I can respect the way Prefontaine handles TEst and the interesting moves he's made, even if we don't get along personally. Not showing respect, that is your right, but maybe it's time to put me on ignore. Phiney is actually doing nothing of what you're claiming. All he's saying is that 2.8B a week is a reasonable for what your alliance would have been making a week should they not have been at war based on your pre-war levels. I know this to be true due to the conversations on TEst channels about approximating what your alliance would have been making when we compared to what we were making at the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phiney Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 The $2.8b number wasn't referring to opp. cost, originally. What you did right here is just change the discussion. I won't call it a full derail, but instead of just admitting that number was way off (and lets be honest, it's laughably off), you've now tried to change the discussion. Despite that, if we had peaced out early, then rebuilt, then as you well know tS/BK hits NPO/UPN and we defend our allies like we do, then lose all the infra again.......you it would've been a negative opportunity cost when factoring in what we spent on rebuilding. So your point, while changing the discussion, is also wrong. And Alpha was 100% correct in assuming another war would break out very soon if we had peaced out tS out 30 days ago and rebuilt. What you just did here is like if I said "I make $35m a week." and you replied, "No you wrong, you make $100m if you count in 5 other Alpha members." And it seems like you constantly do this when the points I make are accurate and reasonable. I get that it's a common debate tactic, but it doesn't really serve any purpose and just leads me to believe you are just shitposting, no offense. But I'll let this go since I have no doubt you'll keep changing the discussion instead of trying to listen to what I'm saying. I think it's only people that have huge problems with me don't realize that I understand the economics of this game better than most and hence why Alpha had the funds to fight the way it did when no one expected we'd be able to. Failure to admit that just results in exchanges like this one, Phiney. Oh well, take care mate. I can respect the way Prefontaine handles TEst and the interesting moves he's made, even if we don't get along personally. Not showing respect, that is your right, but maybe it's time to put me on ignore. Ahahahaha you are a real piece of work arnt you. Tell me where I said what kind of cost the 2.8b was. I simply saw your claim of 2.8b a week being rubbish and decided to work out whether opportunity cost included you could actually make that number. I had 0 idea what the context was originally and do not care. My topic never changed. Stop being such flannel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
durmij Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 Ok, I'll struggle between this and durmij's Electric Boogaloo. Okay, I got one better. Steve's War 2: Pacific Boogaloo. 2 Quote https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjI4ROuPyuY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUUEHv8GHcE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiki Mod Dr Rush Posted June 30, 2016 Wiki Mod Share Posted June 30, 2016 https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?/topic/13648-name-that-war-now-with-to-many-poll-options/ The poll is up. 1 Quote 23:38 Skable that's why we don't want Rose involved, so we can take the m all for ourselves 23:39 [] but Mensa is the cute girl at the school dance and she's only dancing with us right now to get our friend jealous 23:39 [] If Rose comes in and gives Mensa what she wants, she'll just toss us aside and forget we ever existed 23:39 zombie_lanae yeah I do hope we can keep having them all to ourselves 23:40 zombie_lanae I know it's selfish but I want all their love 6:55 PM <+Isolatar> Praise Dio Pubstomper|BNC [20:01:55] Rose wouldn't plan a hit on Mensa because it would be !@#$ing stupid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eumirbago Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 Okay, I got one better. Steve's War 2: Pacific Boogaloo. Much better haha, but still a toss between "Welcome to Orbis" and that one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.