Popular Post Delacroix Posted June 5, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted June 5, 2016 How about adding an option to customise and add more positions to an alliance's structure with options like changing permissions so certain members of a position can make announcements but not access the bank and vice versa, having another layer of command to make big alliance more bureaucratic and efficient and also the false sense of progress when you're promoted from a position of less power to a position of more(but useless) power 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dillon A McCann Posted June 5, 2016 Share Posted June 5, 2016 I agree Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codonian Posted June 5, 2016 Share Posted June 5, 2016 This should actually be a thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sailor Jerry Posted June 5, 2016 Share Posted June 5, 2016 How about adding an option to customise and add more positions to an alliance's structure Well......some of the one I like are the "X-wing fighter" and the "Bridge over troubled water" positions. They are a bit difficult to master, but once you do.....the sky is the limit. Remember though......flexibility is key!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morgan Posted June 5, 2016 Share Posted June 5, 2016 (edited) You can even go so far as being able to tax those different groups in your alliance different rates. For example, this could benefit a group for new members by setting a very low tax rate on that group. Edited June 5, 2016 by Morgan 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dillon A McCann Posted June 5, 2016 Share Posted June 5, 2016 True have a progresive tax. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WISD0MTREE Posted June 5, 2016 Share Posted June 5, 2016 You can even go so far as being able to tax those different groups in your alliance different rates. For example, this could benefit a group for new members by setting a very low tax rate on that group. True have a progresive tax. While I support this, it was brought up in the past it could be used to milk inactives. That's probably one of the main reasons why it wasn't implemented. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnanimus Posted June 6, 2016 Share Posted June 6, 2016 Milking in-actives can be prevented by allowing to put different taxes for people in different score range. The Alliance has to choose the score range and apply the tax. The difference between the minimum and maximum score range for the applied tax can not be less than 400 or more than 500 (something like that, just a suggestion). Also inactive nations get raided and allow for alliance banks to be looted. It is fair enough if the Alliance can milk them in that case. We can also add a stipulation where if a nation goes inactive for more than a month then it stops providing taxes to the Alliance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peacity Peace Posted June 6, 2016 Share Posted June 6, 2016 (edited) ^ Or you know, the alliance could just not be a butt munch and reimburse the inactive nation when it's active again. Or you have to ask permission to put the nation in a taxing rate above 30% or something. Edited June 6, 2016 by Peacity Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bezzers Posted June 6, 2016 Share Posted June 6, 2016 Back to the original point, I like the idea of this actually. Quote Roll Squeegee pact with Redarmy and Ameyuri Blues Brothers pact with Redarmy Leader of the Elyion Resistance. If it's backed by NPO, you know it's evil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delacroix Posted June 8, 2016 Author Share Posted June 8, 2016 Then, all the positions we see in forums in individual alliance forums could be implemented into the game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dillon A McCann Posted June 9, 2016 Share Posted June 9, 2016 Bump Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delacroix Posted June 9, 2016 Author Share Posted June 9, 2016 sheepy Alex pls add Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hadesflames Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 This is highly necessary. It's very annoying to have different positions in your alliance when there are only 3 possibilities in game. There should be a way to assign different permissions to different positions depending on the alliance's needs. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delacroix Posted June 27, 2016 Author Share Posted June 27, 2016 Bump? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.