Apeman Posted June 2, 2016 Author Share Posted June 2, 2016 You are earnest so I'll give you an honest answer. Or at least my sizeup, since I don't really speak for NK. NK is already where they are going. They have a very different idea of what's fun than most of your alliance. Infra-fat cities are a provocation to them: A challenge. It isn't a challenge is the point. Our crew just wanted to fight. I came up with a number they would accept peace for. GPA dropped the ball. It all comes down to choices. I'm all about giving them, I'm all about correcting them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaceman Thrax Posted June 2, 2016 Share Posted June 2, 2016 It isn't a challenge is the point. Our crew just wanted to fight. I came up with a number they would accept peace for. GPA dropped the ball. It all comes down to choices. I'm all about giving them, I'm all about correcting them. My bad. Rock on though. Infinite cheers for doing A THING, regardless of what it is. 2 Quote Slaughter the shits of the world. They poison the air you breathe. ~ William S. Burroughs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
8mrgrim8 Posted June 2, 2016 Share Posted June 2, 2016 (edited) I'm a good sport so I'll say that your plan was extremely well thought out. I'm really glad I am not a high scoring GPA member right now. E1: Curious, what is this St Patricks massacre? The day GPA got rolled by everyone because they weren't neutral enough. http://politicsandwar.wikia.com/wiki/St._Patrick%27s_Massacre Edited June 2, 2016 by 8mrgrim8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aisha Greyjoy Posted June 2, 2016 Share Posted June 2, 2016 When a neutral alliance is #1 on the leaderboards there's a problem. It just reminds the entire world that GPA hasn't learned from the St. Patrick's Massacre. Not sure what they should learn really. Don't grow your nations? Possibly hold larger warchests? and defer some growth? And by all means, stay neutral, don't swing your schlong around(which kind of maybe helped St Patrick's Massacre happen). 1 Quote Duke of House Greyjoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malakai Posted June 2, 2016 Share Posted June 2, 2016 The day GPA got rolled by everyone because they weren't neutral enough. http://politicsandwar.wikia.com/wiki/St._Patrick's_Massacre And now we are facing it again because we closed ranks, dealt with the issue, and moved up the leader board to the #1 spot. There is no negotiating with terrorists. It's a self defeating strategy. You may set my growth back a couple of months, but i'll take that before I roll over and be NK's lap dog. WE LIVE GREEN. WE BLEED GREEN. LONG LIVE THE GPA!! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pangui Posted June 2, 2016 Share Posted June 2, 2016 (edited) Not our style Your alliance is a bunch of nuclear rogues that tried extorting them, you don't really command trust. Do your thing, if you enjoy going rogue, then do it. It doesn't take skill to launch nukes every couple of hours. GPA did what most alliances would do, so I don't see the reasoning for so much chest thumping from NK though. Edited June 2, 2016 by Pangui 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apeman Posted June 2, 2016 Author Share Posted June 2, 2016 (edited) I commend your bravery. How is this action that of nuke rogues? How is it any different then any alliance war? The others never were rogues. It's like calling you a tank rogue or plane rogue. A rogue is one person. When a group of people unite what sets us apart from any other alliance of members who want to wreck something? We choose nukes because it is the only way we could ever compete 7 vs 110 and do more damage. Edited June 2, 2016 by Apeman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vonnorman Posted June 2, 2016 Share Posted June 2, 2016 Your alliance is a bunch of nuclear rogues that tried extorting them, you don't really command trust. Do your thing, if you enjoy going rogue, then do it. It doesn't take skill to launch nukes every couple of hours. GPA did what most alliances would do, so I don't see the reasoning for so much chest thumping from NK though. Chest thumping? From APEMAN? Lmao love it 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shinzo Abe Posted June 2, 2016 Share Posted June 2, 2016 Sad to see some truth that Apeman's so called 'option' can be reversed back to NK. The only way NK option to stay relevant on Orbis politics is to declare war on the neutrals to gain attention and their fun they say, since NK obviously lags behind into stone age compared to others. While some bullies clap for their big balls and that's making them proud. Chest thump. lol 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegoz Posted June 2, 2016 Share Posted June 2, 2016 The reaction from GPA is just as I predicted. You are pretty clueless on the FA front now that Chappie isn't there eh? Also Day 2 damage: https://politicsandwar.com/index.php?id=132&name=Nuclear+Knights&type=alliance&date=2016-06-02&submit=Go 1 Quote [11:52 PM] Prefontaine: But Keegoz is actually bad. [11:52 PM] Prefontaine: He's my favorite bad leader though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Clooney Posted June 2, 2016 Share Posted June 2, 2016 And now we are facing it again because we closed ranks, dealt with the issue, and moved up the leader board to the #1 spot. There is no negotiating with terrorists. It's a self defeating strategy. You may set my growth back a couple of months, but i'll take that before I roll over and be NK's lap dog. This sheep has horns. Good. Watching hippies get slaughtered is boring. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morgan Posted June 2, 2016 Share Posted June 2, 2016 Still no response from any GPA gov. Losing respect fast. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buorhann Posted June 2, 2016 Share Posted June 2, 2016 Apeman has 47 nukes alone. Good lord. 1 Quote Warrior of Dio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfPCFQfOnLg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shinzo Abe Posted June 2, 2016 Share Posted June 2, 2016 Well technically it was. We gave you 12 hours- you attacked earlier. No response from government, 12 hours eclipsed and we nuked. Just because your Government did not want to talk does not mean Nk would not of negotiated. Just means GPA decided to fight( good for you) and did not accept our terms. So we fight. It seems you misunderstand what it means to be neutral. There should be no negotiation to start with for neutrals. Also you seem to misinterpret the difference between negotiation and demand. What NK did is extortion much worse than pirate raiders. I dunno if you are even aware of what you guys did. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shinzo Abe Posted June 2, 2016 Share Posted June 2, 2016 Still no response from any GPA gov. Losing respect fast. Quite a low standard to evaluate the situation. Some members did speak of the situation and that would not be a lie. GPA already did answer NK by countering them. A fair response from any alliance preserving its interest and sovereignty if any form of violation may occur in response to such type of situation. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shinzo Abe Posted June 2, 2016 Share Posted June 2, 2016 This is ridiculous. Check the stats. Oh baby. Do they know we only have so much to lose? The pile we pick from is huge and pays well. Can I suggest you offer the ransom instead? You couldve paid it off twice already. I guess you can't pay while believing fighting us is worth it. Please get your members to stop begging for peace. It really isn't becoming of the number 1 alliance. Contact your gov and complain to them NK becoming what? I guess NK is playing clueless that GPA is fighting for its interest and sovereignty, and not submitting for mere whims. You guys could have demanded other AAs about your demand and possible actions.That way it's better to watch celebrating with everyone. Isn't that much braver and fun than asking the neutrals. xD 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tali Posted June 2, 2016 Share Posted June 2, 2016 Lol@GPA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morgan Posted June 2, 2016 Share Posted June 2, 2016 Quite a low standard to evaluate the situation. Some members did speak of the situation and that would not be a lie. GPA already did answer NK by countering them. A fair response from any alliance preserving its interest and sovereignty if any form of violation may occur in response to such type of situation. It would have been most appropriate to issue a public statement in regards to the attack. No public responses gives off a message of weakness. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Shinzo Abe Posted June 2, 2016 Share Posted June 2, 2016 (edited) It would have been most appropriate to issue a public statement in regards to the attack. No public responses gives off a message of weakness. I'm going to assume that it is damage control. Although it has me confused as well. Edited June 2, 2016 by Shinzo Abe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefontaine Posted June 2, 2016 Share Posted June 2, 2016 (edited) It seems you misunderstand what it means to be neutral. There should be no negotiation to start with for neutrals. Also you seem to misinterpret the difference between negotiation and demand. What NK did is extortion much worse than pirate raiders. I dunno if you are even aware of what you guys did. Quite a low standard to evaluate the situation. Some members did speak of the situation and that would not be a lie. GPA already did answer NK by countering them. A fair response from any alliance preserving its interest and sovereignty if any form of violation may occur in response to such type of situation. NK becoming what? I guess NK is playing clueless that GPA is fighting for its interest and sovereignty, and not submitting for mere whims. You guys could have demanded other AAs about your demand and possible actions.That way it's better to watch celebrating with everyone. Isn't that much braver and fun than asking the neutrals. xD Multi-quote is your friend. The fact that GPA still doesn't understand NKs goal is mind boggling. The reason people are losing respect for GPA is not how they handled the war, it wasn't countering, it wasn't not giving in to the demands. It's posts like these. If you were neutral you wouldn't be making these posts. The more you post, the less neutral GPA looks. Ask your leaders what happened the last time the game thought that about you. Edited June 2, 2016 by Prefontaine 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haylz Posted June 2, 2016 Share Posted June 2, 2016 (edited) I was embargoed by a GPA member for reasons "don't dare to post on our forums again" As you can imagine receiving an embargo with a threat such as this has had me unable to stand straight all day from laughing. However as a rebel I am tempted to see what's behind this threat as my slots are full. Edited June 2, 2016 by Hayley 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malakai Posted June 2, 2016 Share Posted June 2, 2016 (edited) It would have been most appropriate to issue a public statement in regards to the attack. No public responses gives off a message of weakness. OR.... We have chosen to move beyond mere words and apelike grunts terrorists use. Our statement is made by donning our armor and riding out to meet danger face to face. $1.5B may have been a bargain from a single incident point of view, but in the long run it would have set a precedent that would have amounted to trillions across the board. Denying that fact is ignorance or unmitigated deceit. More nuclear rogues would have come out of the woodwork to make a quick free buck. Had we paid, we would have been the first target each and every time. The next attack would be from a larger, harder, more equipped, and less suicidal adversary. Better to spend our resources now than face the power it wields in the wrong hands later. Edited June 2, 2016 by CzarOptima 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oblige Posted June 2, 2016 Share Posted June 2, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiki Mod Dr Rush Posted June 2, 2016 Wiki Mod Share Posted June 2, 2016 Quote 23:38 Skable that's why we don't want Rose involved, so we can take the m all for ourselves 23:39 [] but Mensa is the cute girl at the school dance and she's only dancing with us right now to get our friend jealous 23:39 [] If Rose comes in and gives Mensa what she wants, she'll just toss us aside and forget we ever existed 23:39 zombie_lanae yeah I do hope we can keep having them all to ourselves 23:40 zombie_lanae I know it's selfish but I want all their love 6:55 PM <+Isolatar> Praise Dio Pubstomper|BNC [20:01:55] Rose wouldn't plan a hit on Mensa because it would be !@#$ing stupid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chunky Monkey Posted June 2, 2016 Share Posted June 2, 2016 We have chosen to move beyond mere words and apelike grunts terrorists use. Aren't you using words in all these posts you're making? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.