Jump to content

Should Animals Be Given Equal Rights To Humans?


Nationalist
 Share

Recommended Posts

Would you say so? 

 

A pig can think and feel up to a high level, quite like a child, but yet if somebody kills a pig. It is seen as ok, when a child is killed, it's pure evil.

 

Should animal rights be expanded and meat eating and animal testing banned? If the left want to claim that it's wrong to bomb people, why don't they feel the same on animals being murdered? 

Edited by Nationalist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, they aren't sentient, so they aren't equal to humans. But they can still feel pain so conditions should be improved, and when killed done so in a painless way.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Animals are not sentient?

Perhaps not the right word, self-awareness? As in, aware of our own existence instead of simply acting on instinct.

 

 

He means they aren't class conscious

Why are you so butthurt over a spelling error I made weeks ago?

Edited by Andrezj Kolarov
Link to comment
Share on other sites

abortion is murder of children and that's what a lot of people want to be able to freely do, no questions asked

 

 

57734806.jpg

 

  • Upvote 1

x0H0NxD.jpg?1

 

01:05:55 <%fistofdoom> im out of wine

01:06:03 <%fistofdoom> i winsih i had port
01:06:39 <@JoshF{BoC}> fistofdoom: is the snowman drunk with you

01:07:32 <%fistofdoom> i knet i forgot somehnt

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Babies are human, and have the potential to become a person who contributes to society. While animals are animals and have the potential to eat, poop, and make more animals

 

We also don't eat babies..

Edited by Covenant
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No... The animals shouldn't be given the equal rights as human beings. Pigs aren't human beings nor do they have the capability to rule. They are food and we need food to feed the population. The only exception for the animals in regard to the equal rights is that if some of us consider to adopt them and treat them as pet. Wild and domestic animals should have absolutely no rights, but pets should have equal rights since the are living with us.

  • Upvote 1

 Commander-in-Chief of Svalbard Island


Badassery Rating: 100% / Popularity Rating: 100%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Babies are human, and have the potential to become a person who contributes to society. While animals are animals and have the potential to eat, poop, and make more animals

 

We also don't eat babies..

8969b9efa3ffe7b835ea213005858515.gif

x0H0NxD.jpg?1

 

01:05:55 <%fistofdoom> im out of wine

01:06:03 <%fistofdoom> i winsih i had port
01:06:39 <@JoshF{BoC}> fistofdoom: is the snowman drunk with you

01:07:32 <%fistofdoom> i knet i forgot somehnt

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Babies are human, and have the potential to become a person who contributes to society. While animals are animals and have the potential to eat, poop, and make more animals

 

We also don't eat babies..

What would be the issue with eating babies that have died from natural courses? Assume that a woman either aborts or miscarriages, the remains of the baby could be taken to specialists who can cook up what is left of the baby and serve it to people.  A human baby has a lot of meat on it that can be eaten after all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What would be the issue with eating babies that have died from natural courses?

Assuming you value your humanity, everything.

x0H0NxD.jpg?1

 

01:05:55 <%fistofdoom> im out of wine

01:06:03 <%fistofdoom> i winsih i had port
01:06:39 <@JoshF{BoC}> fistofdoom: is the snowman drunk with you

01:07:32 <%fistofdoom> i knet i forgot somehnt

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This seems like my Bestiality thread but in the other direction. Both have the same basic principle which is why the half measures? Why the illogical nonsense? In fact I'm interested in which people would prefer. A world where "animal rights" are rendered worthless, or one where there rights are equal and you'll get jailed for killing an animal... I wonder. 

 

What would be the issue with eating babies that have died from natural courses? Assume that a woman either aborts or miscarriages, the remains of the baby could be taken to specialists who can cook up what is left of the baby and serve it to people.  A human baby has a lot of meat on it that can be eaten after all. 

 

You can always start a cannibalism thread mate. Give a month or two and maybe I will, or perhaps not. The level of discussion really wouldn't go beyond it's "sick". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This seems like my Bestiality thread but in the other direction. Both have the same basic principle which is why the half measures? Why the illogical nonsense? In fact I'm interested in which people would prefer. A world where "animal rights" are rendered worthless, or one where there rights are equal and you'll get jailed for killing an animal... I wonder. 

 

 

You can always start a cannibalism thread mate. Give a month or two and maybe I will, or perhaps not. The level of discussion really wouldn't go beyond it's "sick". 

 

neither, and i dare you

x0H0NxD.jpg?1

 

01:05:55 <%fistofdoom> im out of wine

01:06:03 <%fistofdoom> i winsih i had port
01:06:39 <@JoshF{BoC}> fistofdoom: is the snowman drunk with you

01:07:32 <%fistofdoom> i knet i forgot somehnt

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This seems like my Bestiality thread but in the other direction. Both have the same basic principle which is why the half measures? Why the illogical nonsense? In fact I'm interested in which people would prefer. A world where "animal rights" are rendered worthless, or one where there rights are equal and you'll get jailed for killing an animal... I wonder. 

 

 

You can always start a cannibalism thread mate. Give a month or two and maybe I will, or perhaps not. The level of discussion really wouldn't go beyond it's "sick". 

What is your opinion on erotic cannibalism? A fair share of people enjoy the act of eating a body for their own pleasure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you say so? 

 

A pig can think and feel up to a high level, quite like a child, but yet if somebody kills a pig. It is seen as ok, when a child is killed, it's pure evil.

 

Should animal rights be expanded and meat eating and animal testing banned? If the left want to claim that it's wrong to bomb people, why don't they feel the same on animals being murdered? 

Would you say the same thing about plants being murdered? I imagine you wouldn't. Life consumes life. That's nature.

Animals should be afforded rights to a reasonable extent. That doesn't mean we should ban meat or animal testing. But of course, the Nazis did like animals and preferred human testing....

 

 

No, they aren't sentient, so they aren't equal to humans. But they can still feel pain so conditions should be improved, and when killed done so in a painless way.

Animals are sentient....

 

 

Perhaps not the right word, self-awareness? As in, aware of our own existence instead of simply acting on instinct.

 

 

Why are you so butthurt over a spelling error I made weeks ago?

Animals are self aware. lol. Keep trying....

Fox_Fire_Txt2.png

_________________________________________________________________

<Jroc> I heard \ is an anagram of cocaine
<\> I can't be rearranged into a line, I already am a line.

--Foxburo Wiki--

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is your opinion on erotic cannibalism? A fair share of people enjoy the act of eating a body for their own pleasure. 

 

Searching that doesn't turn up anything, though I am aware like with most things some people are attracted to visuals of such things (gore and such), I don't think that quite translates to "erotic cannibalism" the physical act. Cannibalism is something that certainly can be argued. A dead body is a dead body after all and if someone put down they wanted to be dead meat then there isn't any harm in that as long as proper procedures were to be followed in regards to safety, paperwork, and such. I'd say if legal to have your dead body made into meat it'd likely be a very low amount that gets put in the meat grinder. 

 

Where it gets iffy is in two respects, well there is more but two wants that jump out at me. The first is that some people will inevitably eat some of the small supply of meat and some will gain a craving. A demand with little legal (and expensive) supply creates a black market and then you'd get criminals butchering people. Though organ harvesting is already a thing... ummm...

The other is if we're talking about legalised Cannibalism than Euthanasia will certainly be legalised also. There have been cases of a person agreeing to be eaten by another, basically suicide. Would that be classed as Euthanasia? Logically it fits, but if so what problems does that bring? That is perhaps that cannibalism you talked about. The eater relishes in being eaten, the eater in the eating. 

 

It's something that would need to be checked out fully pretty much and could be deadly. With zoosexuals it has I've seen been argued like with Homosexuals that the attraction is something you're born with. With Cannibalism I'm not fully familiar. I know it's an uncommon "disorder" in animals and in humans it may well manifest itself in similar numbers but with most people not getting any situation where they need to do the deed, not to mention the fear of the law, it being reviled in general, and so on they never act on their instincts. Or maybe it doesn't manifest, I'm not familiar. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Searching that doesn't turn up anything, though I am aware like with most things some people are attracted to visuals of such things (gore and such), I don't think that quite translates to "erotic cannibalism" the physical act. Cannibalism is something that certainly can be argued. A dead body is a dead body after all and if someone put down they wanted to be dead meat then there isn't any harm in that as long as proper procedures were to be followed in regards to safety, paperwork, and such. I'd say if legal to have your dead body made into meat it'd likely be a very low amount that gets put in the meat grinder. 

 

Where it gets iffy is in two respects, well there is more but two wants that jump out at me. The first is that some people will inevitably eat some of the small supply of meat and some will gain a craving. A demand with little legal (and expensive) supply creates a black market and then you'd get criminals butchering people. Though organ harvesting is already a thing... ummm...

The other is if we're talking about legalised Cannibalism than Euthanasia will certainly be legalised also. There have been cases of a person agreeing to be eaten by another, basically suicide. Would that be classed as Euthanasia? Logically it fits, but if so what problems does that bring? That is perhaps that cannibalism you talked about. The eater relishes in being eaten, the eater in the eating. 

 

It's something that would need to be checked out fully pretty much and could be deadly. With zoosexuals it has I've seen been argued like with Homosexuals that the attraction is something you're born with. With Cannibalism I'm not fully familiar. I know it's an uncommon "disorder" in animals and in humans it may well manifest itself in similar numbers but with most people not getting any situation where they need to do the deed, not to mention the fear of the law, it being reviled in general, and so on they never act on their instincts. Or maybe it doesn't manifest, I'm not familiar. 

Cannibalism has serious health concerns. It's a ridiculous idea to legalize it.

Fox_Fire_Txt2.png

_________________________________________________________________

<Jroc> I heard \ is an anagram of cocaine
<\> I can't be rearranged into a line, I already am a line.

--Foxburo Wiki--

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cannibalism has serious health concerns. It's a ridiculous idea to legalize it.

 

Never said I wanted it, was merely giving some thoughts on it. Like I said I'm not all that familiar with it, but even then a lot of issues stand out. I'd be interested in hearing what these health concerns are though, always like picking up on new things. 

 

Should people with an IQ below 100 be allowed to post their "thoughts" in public?

 

What is your problem exactly? Several times now you've made this form of attack. I was asked a question and I gave some thoughts on the matter and that was all. A sign of intelligence to you apparently is not speaking about something... because not discussing something means you're smarter? In what world exactly? This is a discussion forum, if discussion repulses you so much then simply ignore the post/thread/subforum. 

Edited by Rozalia
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.