Jump to content

Radio show possibility: Partisan and Kangaroo Ocean


Prefontaine
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

Ya we had hookers last time but not enough gambling. Don't worry we'll fix that next time.

☾☆

Priest of Dio


º¤ø„¤¤º°¨ ø„¸¸„¨ ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸
¨°º¤ø„¸ GOD EMPEROR DIO BRANDO¨°º¤ø„¸
¨°º¤ø„¸ DIO BRANDO GOD EMPEROR¨°º¤ø„¸
¨°º¤ø„¤¤º°¨ ø„¸¸„¨ ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸

6m0xPQ1.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not as interesting because if you say something that's full of shit, Steve isn't there to counter it and vice versa. That's the point of having you both on. It would have been you guys effectively telling your sides of what happened with the other to call out the bullshit and me to keep things in order and somewhat on course. Basically we're several weeks removed from the war and your side says Alpha betrayed them. Alpha says they did nothing wrong. Both of these statements cannot be true at the same time either there was or wasn't some form of betrayal or there wasn't. If you come on we'd only hear about the betrayal and not the lack of betrayal. I don't want a show that's just about shitting on Alpha. That's not interesting. 

 

I would listen to that.

  • Upvote 2

 

os9LcJK.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both of these statements cannot be true at the same time either there was or wasn't some form of betrayal or there wasn't.

 

Far be it for me to say that you're incorrect, but I'd have to respectfully disagree with the nature of this comment. I say this was as much neutrality as possible (having just started the game the other day), but both can be true since betrayal is a subjective thing. One side can truly believe the other side betrayed them while the other side believes they did nothing wrong. Just ask any fighting nations in WWI, or Rick Grimes group in TWD vs The Saviours they attacked. 

 

I don't know about the specifics of this conflict (never even heard of this Alpha alliance much less a conflict between tS and Alpha) having just made an account so I'm disagreeing as to the general attitude of that sentence. There can indeed be a sense of betrayal from one end while the other maintains innocence while both statements hold true.

 

Alright gonna escort myself out now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting fact. Steve is the first person to ever flat decline an invite to the show.

 

Though there are a few who we never even bothered to ask, since they'd made clear they'd never in a million years go on the show. Impero for one iirc. I feel like Pfeiffer also made it clear he'd never be on, though I could be completely misremembering that.

wF9Bjre.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Though there are a few who we never even bothered to ask, since they'd made clear they'd never in a million years go on the show. Impero for one iirc. I feel like Pfeiffer also made it clear he'd never be on, though I could be completely misremembering that.

I'm sure pfeiffer has been on?

T7Vrilp.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was, might have been on twice. I said flat out refused. He simply refused to be on the same show as Pubstomper back during whatever war that was. He gladly offered to be on other shows, I believe he had asked to be on one previous to that war as well. 

Edited by Prefontaine

scSqPGJ.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Far be it for me to say that you're incorrect, but I'd have to respectfully disagree with the nature of this comment. I say this was as much neutrality as possible (having just started the game the other day), but both can be true since betrayal is a subjective thing. One side can truly believe the other side betrayed them while the other side believes they did nothing wrong. Just ask any fighting nations in WWI, or Rick Grimes group in TWD vs The Saviours they attacked. 

 

I don't know about the specifics of this conflict (never even heard of this Alpha alliance much less a conflict between tS and Alpha) having just made an account so I'm disagreeing as to the general attitude of that sentence. There can indeed be a sense of betrayal from one end while the other maintains innocence while both statements hold true.

 

Alright gonna escort myself out now. 

 

While you would normally be correct, your lack of knowledge in this matter is what's making you incorrect. The betrayal stemmed from conversations where a certain action was agreed upon, allegedly, then the opposite of the agreement happened. Right and wrong is a matter of perspective, yes, but here we have a case where one side claims betrayal of an agreement while the other says they did nothing wrong. Either an agreement was reached and breached or was not. Thus my statement both things cannot be true. 

scSqPGJ.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aw come on Steve, take one for the team. It would have been an interesting show.

 

I'd be willing to come on and explain why cf switched block, since some people were asking me about that, but might not be interesting enough for the general public.

It's my birthday today, and I'm 33!

That means only one thing...BRING IT IN, GUYS!

*every character from every game, comic, cartoon, TV show, movie, and book reality come in with everything for a HUGE party*

4nVL9WJ.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd give it a listen. I missed all the other shows. :o

We have seized the means of production. Though union, and self-governance, we have organized between all peoples of the land.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll come on and play the role of Steve.

  • Upvote 4

☾☆ Chairman Emeritus of Mensa HQ ☾☆

"It's not about the actual fish, themselves. Fish are not important in this context. It's about fish-ing, the act of fishing itself." -Jack O'Neill

iMZejv3.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While you would normally be correct, your lack of knowledge in this matter is what's making you incorrect. The betrayal stemmed from conversations where a certain action was agreed upon, allegedly, then the opposite of the agreement happened. Right and wrong is a matter of perspective, yes, but here we have a case where one side claims betrayal of an agreement while the other says they did nothing wrong. Either an agreement was reached and breached or was not. Thus my statement both things cannot be true. 

 

That's fair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aw come on Steve, take one for the team. It would have been an interesting show.

 

I'd be willing to come on and explain why cf switched block, since some people were asking me about that, but might not be interesting enough for the general public.

 

I told you, Steve doesn't trust me any more. Clearly he is worried about me leaking the radio show publicly after we record it and broadcast it live. 

  • Upvote 4

scSqPGJ.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Typical rat behavior

It's my birthday today, and I'm 33!

That means only one thing...BRING IT IN, GUYS!

*every character from every game, comic, cartoon, TV show, movie, and book reality come in with everything for a HUGE party*

4nVL9WJ.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.