Niemand Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 Yeah Placentica does say some pretty stupid things but thats why people love him. Love is what keeps us being active in P&W. Best is when it is mutual despite the pixel burning. I fear there is not much love in the air despite Valentine's day was there a few days ago. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nie Li Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 Backstabs aren't always effective. The thought counts though. Like the one T$ and SK planned on making Rose fight UPN and then kill Rose off. Right? Quote Protector of Low tier nations, from Empire of Spades. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beowulf the Second Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 (edited) -snipped, because I don't know anything about anything- Edited February 17, 2016 by Beowulf the Second Quote 01:58:39 <BeowulftheSecond> Belisarius of The Byzantine Empire has sent your nation $0.00, 0.00 food, 0.00 coal, 0.00 oil, 0.00 uranium, 0.00 lead, 0.00 iron, 0.00 bauxite, 0.00 gasoline, 0.00 munitions, 1,000.00 steel, and 0.00 aluminum from the alliance bank of Rose.01:58:46 <BeowulftheSecond> someone please explain 01:59:12 <%Belisarius> sleep deprivatin is a !@#$ @_@01:59:14 — %Belisarius shrugs01:59:18 <BeowulftheSecond> we're at WAR. WE ARE BURNING EACH OTHER'S PIXELS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Stewart Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 Like the one T$ and SK planned on making Rose fight UPN and then kill Rose off. Right? ayy lmao we already fought a war about this, you don't need to bring it up again. if you want to go over the old battle lines: >VE did the same thing as us yet you allied with them against us, which suggests some ulterior motive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boony Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 Like the one T$ and SK planned on making Rose fight UPN and then kill Rose off. Right? Uh what? Gets your facts straight bud. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buorhann Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 Like the one T$ and SK planned on making Rose fight UPN and then kill Rose off. Right? t$ wasn't involved with that. 1 Quote Warrior of Dio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfPCFQfOnLg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Cody K Posted February 17, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted February 17, 2016 Like the one T$ and SK planned on making Rose fight UPN and then kill Rose off. Right? That was all SK. And we would have gotten away with it too, if it wasn't for you meddling kids! 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shellhound Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 Like the one T$ and SK planned on making Rose fight UPN and then kill Rose off. Right?The amount of inaccuracy in this is astounding. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Memph Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 t$ wasn't involved with that. And UPN wasn't the target. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nie Li Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 The amount of inaccuracy in this is astounding.No this is inaccurate. http://politicsandwar.wikia.com/wiki/Great_VE_War My version is the most accurate thing available. PS: Shut up hound. Losers can't write the history, only winners do. 1 Quote Protector of Low tier nations, from Empire of Spades. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shellhound Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 No this is inaccurate. http://politicsandwar.wikia.com/wiki/Great_VE_War My version is the most accurate thing available. PS: Shut up hound. Losers can't write the history, only winners do. You forget my multis, I am the winning side. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Filthy Fifths Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 the treaty web is happy today. Quote "In an honest service there is thin commons, low wages, and hard labor; in this, plenty and satiety, pleasure and ease, liberty and power; and who would not balance creditor on this side, when all the hazard that is run for it, at worst, is only a sour look or two at choking. No, a merry life and a short one, shall be my motto." - Bartholomew "Black Bart" Roberts Green Enforcement Agency will rise again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Placentica Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 I do understand the Syndicate's position this war. I didn't resent them for attacking my ally. I didn't resent them from supporting Mensa's bullying of Vanguard. I know they are super tight with Mensa, so it made sense. We were a small alliance too. We know what it's like to be raided being the little guys less than a year ago. I didn't agree with their reasons for entering the war, but I tried to see it from their perspective. It's not like this is the first time allies were on opposite sides of a war. If anyone was betrayed this war, it wasn't our friends in tS though. We were very upfront about our view of this war. We made that very clear. Very clear. I don't think our stance this war comes as any surprise to anyone if they are being honest and not running the spin-machine, lol. So I'm being honest when I say I wish tS the best of luck. 1 Quote Hello! If you don't like this post please go here: https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?app=core&module=usercp&tab=core&area=ignoredusers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Rozalia Posted February 18, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted February 18, 2016 I do understand the Syndicate's position this war. I didn't resent them for attacking my ally. I didn't resent them from supporting 1/Mensa's bullying/ of Vanguard. I know they are super tight with Mensa, so it made sense. We were a small alliance too. We know what it's like to be raided being the little guys less than a year ago. 2/I didn't agree with their reasons for entering the war/, but I tried to see it from their perspective. It's not like this is the first time allies were on opposite sides of a war. 3/If anyone was betrayed this war, it wasn't our friends in tS though/. We were very upfront about our view of this war. We made that very clear. Very clear. I don't think our stance this war comes as any surprise to anyone if they are being honest and not running the spin-machine, lol. So I'm being honest when 4/I say I wish tS the best of luck/. Alpha is a Rose proxy alliance so you see Alpha was merely defending itself (Rose) from tS's side's vicious attacks on Alpha itself. 3/so the real betrayer is tS/ for allowing Alpha to be attacked while we had a treaty with them (tS). Reality is Alpha should have cancelled on tS first and not the other way around, but 4/we're good guys who don't have hard feelings/ and this is merely another show that tS are butthurt. 2/Oh and Rose did nothing wrong alright/, they were viciously attacked by 1/those bullies Mensa/ and were only defending themselves. So hahaha at tS betraying us and then saying we betrayed them, what butthurt losers using insane logic. Told you so Astra. Don't doubt the Roz on such matters, he knows what he's talking about. I may add some flavour here or there but the points themselves are on the money. 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James II Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Told you so Astra. Don't doubt the Roz on such matters, he knows what he's talking about. I may add some flavour here or there but the points themselves are on the money. Are you still sour about Alpha confirming your irrelevance? 1 Quote "Most successful new AA" - Samuel Bates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozalia Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 (edited) Are you still sour about Alpha confirming your irrelevance? Loaded question. Also we're very relevant to you guys I'd think or 5 other alliances (3 of them solely on us) wouldn't have attacked us to "minimise damage to Rose", I mean from what I'm told Rose had to go threatening them to act, of course threats are not necessary for Alpha I'm sure. I'm quite humble don't you worry. Anyway I'm not unhappy no that Alpha proved me correct all along when I called them Rose minions when they signed the RAT pact. I like being right like most people even if I get blown up a bit in that process of proving such things. Edited February 18, 2016 by Rozalia 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ekaterina Kalmyk Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 I do understand the Syndicate's position this war. I didn't resent them for attacking my ally. I didn't resent them from supporting Mensa's bullying of Vanguard. I know they are super tight with Mensa, so it made sense. We were a small alliance too. We know what it's like to be raided being the little guys less than a year ago. I didn't agree with their reasons for entering the war, but I tried to see it from their perspective. It's not like this is the first time allies were on opposite sides of a war. Here's the thing: The Syndicate was your ally, too, as much as Rose was at that time. You say you tried to see it from their perspective, but all I see are a bunch of statements about how you felt at the time and what your perspective was. Maybe if you'd succeeded in seeing it from their perspective, you'd understand why t$ now feels betrayed when their ally jumped into a war they didn't even have to in order to fight against them. If anyone was betrayed this war, it wasn't our friends in tS though. We were very upfront about our view of this war. We made that very clear. Very clear. I don't think our stance this war comes as any surprise to anyone if they are being honest and not running the spin-machine, lol. So I'm being honest when I say I wish tS the best of luck. Just because they saw it coming doesn't mean it didn't hurt. 1 Quote Original Art Credit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boony Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 I do understand the Syndicate's position this war. I didn't resent them for attacking my ally. I didn't resent them from supporting Mensa's bullying of Vanguard. I know they are super tight with Mensa, so it made sense. We were a small alliance too. We know what it's like to be raided being the little guys less than a year ago. I didn't agree with their reasons for entering the war, but I tried to see it from their perspective. It's not like this is the first time allies were on opposite sides of a war. If anyone was betrayed this war, it wasn't our friends in tS though. We were very upfront about our view of this war. We made that very clear. Very clear. I don't think our stance this war comes as any surprise to anyone if they are being honest and not running the spin-machine, lol. So I'm being honest when I say I wish tS the best of luck. You said you wouldnt attack anyone besides Roz Wei. Then you attacked SK. K Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Armstrong Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 I do understand the Syndicate's position this war. I didn't resent them for attacking my ally. I didn't resent them from supporting Mensa's bullying of Vanguard. I know they are super tight with Mensa, so it made sense. We were a small alliance too. We know what it's like to be raided being the little guys less than a year ago. I didn't agree with their reasons for entering the war, but I tried to see it from their perspective. It's not like this is the first time allies were on opposite sides of a war. If anyone was betrayed this war, it wasn't our friends in tS though. We were very upfront about our view of this war. We made that very clear. Very clear. I don't think our stance this war comes as any surprise to anyone if they are being honest and not running the spin-machine, lol. So I'm being honest when I say I wish tS the best of luck. Actually, your gov member assured us that Alpha may enter the war but in a way that would not affect any of its allies (especially tS or Rose) and that we would receive a heads up before you did declare. Since you did attack our allies and you did not give us a heads up about anyone you declared on it came across not only as a betrayal but also as a huge !@#$ you. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemal Ergenekon Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 I love this thread. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefontaine Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 I have discovered a rare Photo of a meeting of Steve with his political strategists. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenages Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 ^Screw you Tenages Hey now, I was extremely literal when I told you that once we took out VE, SK and Rose were going to be in opposite blocs opposed to each other. I meant "literally as soon as it's over." Radical honesty. Also hate to dispute your statement re: the effectiveness of butterknives, but I sliced the shit out of my hand with one of them sum!@#$es. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordRahl2 Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 From your alliance page: Foreign Affairs: RAT PACT- Rose - MnDoAP Clubhouse Diplomacy - The Syndicate - MnDoAP Robot House Accords - Fark - oDoAP From the PnW Wikia: http://politicsandwar.wikia.com/wiki/MnDoAP The "Non-Chaining" aspect of the treaty refers to the non-obligation for alliances to defend one another if one is attacked as retaliation from declaring war on a third party; however, it is usually still encouraged. The "n" in your two MnDoAPs means that you really didn't have to jump into the war on the Rose side. If you'd really cared about your relationship with The Syndicate, you would've sat it out. I'm sure both sides would've been understanding once you pointed out the awkward position your alliance was in due to your two MnDoAPs with the two main opposing sides in the war. I'm not surprised The Syndicate feels betrayed. So every time I see you post like "I was just fulfilling our treaty obligations," I smell bullshit. Seems that this got buried on page 2 so I though I would move it up. 6 Quote -signature removed for rules violation- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eumirbago Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Actually, your gov member assured us that Alpha may enter the war but in a way that would not affect any of its allies (especially tS or Rose) and that we would receive a heads up before you did declare. Since you did attack our allies and you did not give us a heads up about anyone you declared on it came across not only as a betrayal but also as a huge !@#$ you. Just gonna quote this again just in case Steve forgets Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefontaine Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 in case Steve forgets You mean chooses not to remember. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.