Jump to content

Democratic Nomination


Speaker Faris Wheeler
 Share

  

67 members have voted

  1. 1. Who do you support?

    • Hillary Clinton
      12
    • Bernie Sanders
      42
    • Martin O'Malley
      5


Recommended Posts

Vote! Why do you like X

Edited by Lysandre Mackintosh

 

 

Peace will never be accomplished without war, but war cannot happen without peace.... or something like that idk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Politics and War seems to be berning up

  • Upvote 6

º¤ø„¤¤º°¨ ø„¸¸„¨ ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸

 

¨°º¤ø„¸ GOD EMPEROR BIO DRANDO¨°º¤ø„¸

 

¨°º¤ø„¸ BIO DRANDO GOD EMPEROR¨°º¤ø„¸

 

¨°º¤ø„¤¤º°¨ ø„¸¸„¨ ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except for those Trump idiots. (You know who you are, Trump idiots.)

i liked your post y u insult me

 

I cri

 

 

 

ripstorm...

Edited by Lysandre Mackintosh

 

 

Peace will never be accomplished without war, but war cannot happen without peace.... or something like that idk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who the hell voted for Hillary? <_<

A stupid liar most likely
  • Upvote 3

 

 

Peace will never be accomplished without war, but war cannot happen without peace.... or something like that idk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bro, do some research. Bernie Sanders is nothing close to the type of socialist you are referring to (Leninist). There is a large difference between Marxism/Leninism and Social Democracy. Also, his essay on women was written in 1972, and was also very vague. Back in 72', things were very different. For one thing, Donald Trump's father was hanging out with his buddies from the KKK, which he was a part of. Bernie doesn't even want to raise taxes that much, his highest tax would be 52% on the top class. We had taxes these high before Bush came along. 

52% taxes, do you understand perecent means people that make more money pay more taxes beacuse of the percent. You realize 52% means more than half of someones moeny is going to the government, i can understand progressive income tax( although, as I mentioned earlier in this post percent means rich pay more, so thats why i want flat tax rates) but OVER HALF THE MONEY YOU EARN GOING TO SOMEONE ELSE, just stupid.

  • Upvote 1

Gary Johnson 2016

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52% taxes, do you understand perecent means people that make more money pay more taxes beacuse of the percent. You realize 52% means more than half of someones moeny is going to the government, i can understand progressive income tax( although, as I mentioned earlier in this post percent means rich pay more, so thats why i want flat tax rates) but OVER HALF THE MONEY YOU EARN GOING TO SOMEONE ELSE, just stupid.

When you earn over a billion dollars a year, chances are, you don't need all of it to survive and live a good life.

Edited by Saruman
  • Upvote 5

º¤ø„¤¤º°¨ ø„¸¸„¨ ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸

 

¨°º¤ø„¸ GOD EMPEROR BIO DRANDO¨°º¤ø„¸

 

¨°º¤ø„¸ BIO DRANDO GOD EMPEROR¨°º¤ø„¸

 

¨°º¤ø„¤¤º°¨ ø„¸¸„¨ ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you earn over a billion dollars a year, chances are, you don't need all of it to survive and live a good life.

Yeah, but when you earn over a billion dollars a year, chances are you've done deserve the right to AT LEAST HALF your money. Captilism is human nature, it's worked for a long time, the government needs to stop messing up and let the much more effective free market dictate the economy

Gary Johnson 2016

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly, and if one gives a good amount of that money already to charity, they should be exonerated.

Sure, give money to a good cause instead of the corruptness that is the US government, I would support that.

Gary Johnson 2016

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, but when you earn over a billion dollars a year, chances are you've done deserve the right to AT LEAST HALF your money. Captilism is human nature, it's worked for a long time, the government needs to stop messing up and let the much more effective free market dictate the economy

Having over a billion dollars is useless. With just a few million, you can have a ginormous mansion, a Ferrari, and virtually anything you want. Social Democracy has been proven to work better than free market capitalism. Just look at northern Europe and Australia. 

  • Upvote 4

º¤ø„¤¤º°¨ ø„¸¸„¨ ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸

 

¨°º¤ø„¸ GOD EMPEROR BIO DRANDO¨°º¤ø„¸

 

¨°º¤ø„¸ BIO DRANDO GOD EMPEROR¨°º¤ø„¸

 

¨°º¤ø„¤¤º°¨ ø„¸¸„¨ ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having over a billion dollars is useless. With just a few million, you can have a ginormous mansion, a Ferrari, and virtually anything you want. Social Democracy has been proven to work better than free market capitalism. Just look at northern Europe and Australia. 

how are you supposed to aquire a few million in a Social Democracy

Gary Johnson 2016

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you earn over a billion dollars a year, chances are, you don't need all of it to survive and live a good life.

Who are you to tell another how much wealth they can have?

 

I vote for O'Malley because he is neither a felon nor an abstract Statist who believes in Wealth Distribution, also known as theft.

 

Hmm. Either two criminals or a decent public servant. I'll take the decent public servant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

#FeelTheBern

Damn I was gonna say the same.

#FeeltheCorby

Caliph of The Caliphate of Arabia. Caliph of the Islamic State of Arabia. Principle of The Principality of Chechnya. Grand Emir of The Emirate of The Caucus. Emperor of the Empire of Persia. Sultan of The Sultanates of Turkey and The Crimea. Czar of the Tsardom of The Balkans. Archon of The Archonate of Greece. Supreme Consul of The Consulate of Italy. Shah of The Shahdom Of Khorason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't managed it personally but I've heard there are millionaires in many forms of government, including social democracies. :D

Name one who did not use the United States economy to achieve their wealth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Name one who did not use the United States economy to achieve their wealth.

Um Lord Sugar?

Caliph of The Caliphate of Arabia. Caliph of the Islamic State of Arabia. Principle of The Principality of Chechnya. Grand Emir of The Emirate of The Caucus. Emperor of the Empire of Persia. Sultan of The Sultanates of Turkey and The Crimea. Czar of the Tsardom of The Balkans. Archon of The Archonate of Greece. Supreme Consul of The Consulate of Italy. Shah of The Shahdom Of Khorason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok then I'll try Roman Abramovich.

Or Sultan of Buhtan

Caliph of The Caliphate of Arabia. Caliph of the Islamic State of Arabia. Principle of The Principality of Chechnya. Grand Emir of The Emirate of The Caucus. Emperor of the Empire of Persia. Sultan of The Sultanates of Turkey and The Crimea. Czar of the Tsardom of The Balkans. Archon of The Archonate of Greece. Supreme Consul of The Consulate of Italy. Shah of The Shahdom Of Khorason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.