Salt Meat

"A convenient, disingenuous reframing" he posts unironically and with no self awareness while calling the French Revolution a genocide.

"The French Revolution is too violent to reference", he posts unironically and with no self awareness from his Viking themed account.

Hello, ghost of Goonmas past here. Just wanted to clear some stuff up. Ignore it if you want, but note that I've long since checked out of the game and have no allegiances or politics to push. First up, it was very much sincere, and happened long before any "blocs within blocs" came about. We got along quite well with TKR and many of the other Chaos alliances. We wanted them out of the war and would have been very open to working on a "sphere" with them post war. We ultimately worked it out with the coalition that we could extend an offer of white peace to Chaos, but they refused to peace without KETOG. This was not a deal breaker, we didn't really care for many of the KETOG alliances, particularly considering TGH were the reason we ended up in the war in the first place, but whatever, fight to the end. The real final nail in the coffin was the two-facedness, namely when you have an alliance such as TKR playing the BFF role in private, and then posting on the forums that the GOON Boogeyman wanted to drive them from the game, while an offer of white peace was on the table the entire time. So yes, when all your options are either alliances you despise, or two faced manipulators, you get "blocs within blocs" with NPO. Keep in mind, we had no strong ties to NPO from the outset. We started out with a protectorate from them because we were familiar with Roquentin from back in the CN days. We had no interest in the war until we ended up dragged by TGH, and we had no grudges or dislikes of any alliances outside of those who were ideology opposed to us. We could have went in any direction post war, but everyone was nice enough to shoehorn us into a role, so naturally we embraced it and bonded with what would become the OD sphere. Nope. We just didn't like Epi very much. Arthur and the rest were cool, and we honestly had bigger and better fish to fry than gunning for Camelot.

Hmm yes, the Italian teenager/US Navy Seal who had a $500k business deal cancelled mere hours after someone told them to stop acting skeevy on discord in a browser game. I'm sure the dump of that server still exists if you want to start playing the victim card again.

That's a picture of a plan on their own forum, not an announcement here. At least we know only the best and brightest will be left behind if they do quit.

I don't think any of those alliances have claimed to be quitting?

Heartwarming to see Minesome added to the list of things that can bring both sides of the war together in agreement.

I believe the moderation team sees it as such too, seeing as despite your objection, all references to "Lolis" have been rightly scrubbed from the game when found.

Are you still hung up on the fact that you can't talk about your "Loli" child pornography? It's time to let it go, and no, a drawing of a skeleton hugging a butt is not equivalent.

Please stop reminding me that this wonderful war is partially because of you.

What a lovely bunch of coconuts.

You're basically Noctis, but instead of having to mention GOONS in every topic, it's a defunct Bloc.

Godspeed, Jazz Aldrin.

Quarter centuries?

Greatest alliance ever? I really can't say, but yes.

We live in a Butt House of lies.

Quality post.

That's... exactly what I just said my dude. Going on a "porn posting spree" is obviously disallowed no matter where you post, but warning you for "posting in a NDF" rather than for posting porn, spamming, or whatever gives mixed signals. Regardless, the rules have been updated now to more closely represent the moderation approach, which is appreciated @Chief Wiggum

Looks like you're winning!

Are we really trying the "You won't let us surrender, also we're winning" schtick again?

I believe that's the point he's trying to make. What you said is how it's enforced, but the rules specify otherwise, particularly that you can post if you're the accused, or you're providing evidence, not necessarily both. In addition, if the post is spam, perhaps give a warn for spam, not for posting in NDF, which as far as the written rules are concerned, he is allowed to. I guess the idea here at the end of the day is clarity. The way the moderation was handled is reasonable, but the rules should be adjusted to reflect the approach.

Is there a competition between yourself and Barfsalot in TGH to see who can make the most vague allusions to things with absolutely nothing to back it up? What's the prize?

Just to make sure I'm not confused with who I'm talking to. Is this the same Cooper that recently tried to tell me that BK defending BoC with Camelot wasn't a defensive action? TLE hits us because someone 2 treaty chains away also hit us, and that's what you call entering defensively?

Still waiting for evidence of this. Note that things you've pulled out of your rear end do not qualify as evidence.