Denison

npowned was better

RedArmy was a super genuine dude! No matter your side in a war he'd come over to your discord and just say hi as he did with KT when we hit ASM in the past. 33 is too young for anyone to die and my prayers are with him and his loved ones.

IT BETTER!

This time next year aight

If I am not mistaken, you explicitly state on your nation page that you are a member of the Federation. Please stop embarrassing yourself m8. You're nothing more than a pixel hugger and I'm surprised they keep you as low gov after this little charade. I guess that just has to do with the fact that they're so shit that your smear fits right in.

My immediate reaction finding out I can no longer take out a loan from an internet game bank which has a credit score system.

WOAH, HOF IS NOT KT. DON"T EVEN TRY TO MAKE THAT ACCUSATION.

>HoF and Polaris

>imagine Dragonia these balls on your face

All good, I just felt a little disgusted being associated with Hollywood and Celestial Cringe

Minesome, Why is HoF where it is 🤡

Or just base your gov on Meritocracy instead of personal feelings. Problem is a lot of alliances don't have the people willing to do the jobs, such as MA or IA, and former leaders or retirees are forced into these roles to keep their alliance afloat. This doesn't help anyone in terms of development of their alliance and only forces them back into roles that they had long since wanted to part ways with. However I am not sure telling people to stay retired is a complete solution to the source of the problem. Obviously you have people like Nokia who return every other month that they quit the game but have you ever thought of the reasons for why? When TCM was a thing he often was forced to return for the same reasons I stated above. But does that mean that an alliance should not exist if it can't live without retired gov? That is for the people of these alliances to decide. "Democracy" may be the solution to irl problems, but in game, not so much. It's inefficient in the game and often the best Meritocracy will out perform the best Democracy. There are not many alliances in the game where Democracy is the best idea because they do not have enough people in the alliance to make it work. I know this is not directly correlated to the game but bare with me, "For the first time, Pew Research asked a question about who seeks out these offices and found that about 2% of Americans say they have ever run for federal, local, or state elected office." Now if you're willing to be so courteous, extrapolate that to a game or an alliance and you'll understand. Burnout is real and I have burned out several times playing this game and many times have had to will myself through it for the betterment of my alliance and the people I care for. I understand my post may not be answering all of the things you stated or may have gone off on some weird tangent, but try to look at it from their point of view. Obviously there will be those bad few and those exceptions(Adrienne).

I just felt like posting this banger too.