Vemek

Investor Contact: Vemek Media Contact: WANA SYNDICATE CORPORATION (NYSE:SCC) announces a series of changes to the corporate boardroom, effective immediately. The Syndicate announces that Chief Financial Officer Vemek has elected to retire from active corporate governance and retire to the position of Executive Emeritus. Vemek has stewarded the finances and growth of t$ to new heights during his tenure as Economic Executive, and t$ is proud to send him on his way to an undisclosed beachfront compound with a new exclusive timepiece. New economic heights were reached under his care and despite early setbacks against competititors, the Syndicate’s long-term projects in the whaling industry have begun to prosper. In his place we now welcome ɯɐɹǝʞ (Keram), former Vice President of Corporate Investment and head of the now defunct Investigative Committee into Corruption, tasked with exposing any dishonest or fraudulent conduct amongst the top brass of the Syndicate. Despite being imminently qualified to leave t$ and start a new business venture, as so many economic advisors of t$ have done thanks to being the leading financial hegemon in Orbis, Vemek merely asked that he be allowed to quietly retire and only requested the summary incineration of a series of documents in relation to reports of bribery, intimidation, whale trafficking and a misallocation of funds in the [REDACTED] region. SYNDICATE CORPORATION strictly denies the veracity of recently leaked video tapes purportedly captured whilst the former CFO was escorted out of his high rise executive office in Nassau, which detractors claim depicts him lunging at his successor whilst screaming “!@#$ that aussie”. The Syndicate’s team of legal advisors would also like to note that any individuals or companies propagating the falsified video will be met with charges of libel and slander and that it has begun an investigation into the identities of those behind the doctored footage. SYNDICATE CORPORATION also announces new additions to the acquisition and security offices as Allend Goodblood has been promoted to a Vice President of t$ whilst Odin will be taking over his position as Director of Security in the Enterprise branch. ABOUT SYNDICATE, INC., SYNDICATE, Inc., based in Nassau, the Bahamas, is the world’s premium gasoline, aluminum, and munitions manufacturer and distributor for a wide variety of peacekeeping and humanitarian activities. Wholly-owned SYNDICATE, Inc. subsidiary brands include the Enterprise, Orbis’ foremost talent scouting and management agency; the Charlie Group, premium asset management firm; and Charming Friends, bringing syndicalism to syndicates. For more information about SYNDICATE, Inc., and its activities, contact WANA, Chief Global Strategist.

The person that removed you isn't in tS and hasn't been for a long while. I don't think you should be pinning this on us two years later

The date on your logs are 12/12/2021 which lines up with when the war began. Wana's logs mention a swap to full mil which means that conversation came first. Now, I ask you my initial question again

Do you dispute the initial logs in which Keegoz's first suggestion is a request that we expand onto Rose with you?

Clock: reee minispheres fair wars Also Clock: >asks BW to dogpile rose alongside them

If #1 and #3 are both implemented people may as well be guaranteed a full rebuild regardless of what you do and the value of the blitz factor ends up being greatly diminished. This would largely shift the decisive factor in wars to be the size of an alliances stockpile rather than skill, coordination or general military performance since I'd imagine evenly matched wars would devolve into both sides counter blitzing each other until somebody goes broke. (also rip the milcom people who'd have to organise this lmao). Wars would end up being a lot less frequent with alliances spending large amounts of time in peace focused on rebuilding their stockpiles and people would also be a lot more reluctant to fight wars on even terms knowing how damaging it can be. Putting an emphasis on stockpiles also greatly disadvantages newer alliances needing to push nation growth and simultaneously front the costs of an increased stockpile whilst lacking the extensive reserves or strong tax bases of the older and larger alliances in the game.

I'm unsure as to the point being made here. You are justifying a sphere containing TKR-GG-TI and simultaneously discrediting a rose-t$ tie on the basis of.... morality? Cool, you guys are spotless (lol) give yourselves a pat on the back. The core complaint I have seen has hinged on tiering which has been discussed to death and the common consensus seems to be that HW and Ro$e are largely equal. The other complaint I've seen is the idea of ro$e having too many 'drivers' of politics in one sphere when both GG and TI are in your sphere. GG is already a major driver in politics and they could very well lead their own sphere to be a 'mover and shaker' to the same scale as t$, TKR, Rose, Cata etc if they so wished but instead choose not to do so. Your entire point of 'syndi man bad' is irrelevant to either of those two issues being discussed and I don't even know what the first two things you're talking about are.

I appreciate the counters guys!

I’m not going to sit here and say there is no merit to some things lined out in the post but its telling when you’re more concerned about denouncing the political implications of something rather than someone saying “can’t say Turks have much of a backbone or moral integrity”. The point being made was that HC was using retired gov members combatting a narrative in discord servers to push the idea of us supposedly being rife of toxicity. The parallels are clear to see when his gov not only posts toxic responses like this but also then double down on it. How are you preaching to others about toxicity whilst various gov and members from your alliance are doing worse. (lol as if Turkish being a culture excuses this) Even when the original poster is publicly endorsing people as his gov whom are doing exactly what he is critiquing others for? This was not brought up by us, if you are able to criticize others for it you should also be able to deal with it internally in your own alliance and the way you have responded indicates the opposite. Thus far the response from HoF has ranged from indifference to outright supporting what was said. We are pointing out the discrepancy between the attitude from all of you and HCs message. I don’t know why you are trying to spin this into us moving away from the topic when it is a valid critique of your argument.

I am genuinely curious, at what point since Brawlywood have we even brought up the threat of GG or HW for that matter? GOB wanted us as revenge for the past few wars as they said themselves, good for them. Don't manufacture your CB out of thin air lmfao. ...We manipulate the rest of the game into constantly fighting each other rather than getting involved ourselves? Which war was this?

TIL a major leader in one sphere threatening to hit another = being mean.

While you're at it could you get Guardian to wake up? I think old age must be getting to them because they fell asleep mid blitz

The cap doesn't really help with downdecs in the tiers where they are impactful, a C17 being capped to C10 downdecs is not impactful in any way when at the same time a C40 is capped at declaring on a C21 and anything above. The cap as it is proposed is not decreasing the power of downdecs in a meaningful way unless it's scaled differently. Given the downdec cap in it's current proposed state is redundant I also don't think the decrease in city score is warranted either, especially given downdecs are still alive and well so I don't see an 'issue' being solved or an improvement of gameplay in such a change.