[CTO Stealing Reasources?]

I am willing to act as arbitrator. Pls send me the rss till we can decide the validity of your claims

[[Anniversary] Way More than 9 Lives]

How is it an Arrghiversary if you aren't mass-raiding Rose or smth!!!!

[Game Development Discussion: Minor Changes & QoL Updates]

I disagree with all of these projects

[TCM Gov/Treaty for 2024.]

The only improvement in TCM seems to be their newfound ability to use punctuations

[[Gov Change / Merger] Beware the Assassins [Gov Change / Merger]]

Step 1: Get Bank Access

Step 2: Send Bank to BABAI WHALE FUNDS

STEP 3: ????

STEP 4: PROFIT

[Game Development Discussion: Tariffs]

Me like this. It help Black Market Trading, i.e, people selling via proxies.

[Game Development Discussion: Expanded Updeclare Range and Expanded City Timer Grace Period]

I am of the view that all cities above 20 should mandatorily need credits to be built. 21 needs 5 credits, 22 needs 7 and so on with increments of 2 credits. Ofc, you'll also need to spend 4 credits to reset the timer. 

[[???] An ODOO Declaration]

If dTC pretends to a kawaii girl, maybe he'll have more success getting spy ops done

[Global War 28 Tiering Report]

1 hour ago, KindaEpicMoah said:

Rose actually cares about that part of war so Hidude can't share it

How does it matter? It is all public anyway! 

[Global War 28 Tiering Report]

12 hours ago, hidude45454 said:

Updated 7/28/23 ~12:00 AM GMT:

Military Strength:

Military Strength Comparison Graph (Based on Totals):

Military Strength Comparison Graph (Based on Averages):

Summary:

With KT's limited entry but CTO's mostly full one, this kills the Florida. Though the mid-high tiers are still kind of contested, Anti-Florida has made reasonable progress there and large progress in all other tiers, and has all but nullified Florida's numerical advantage in those tiers as well.

Since spies can be pulled with the API, might also want to show those ig

[[RoH] CRIES IN CAT]

[(Peace) Honor Over All (2 out of 3)]

26 minutes ago, Alan said:

impartial 3rd party

Yes, ET would volunteer for this

[Moderation points appeal]

Just now, Alex said:

Well, you are correct that it is all context dependent. But you're playing an online game an if you're expressing hateful ideologies towards others, then yeah that's generally going to be against the rules. There's no reason for it here - you don't have to see or know about what anyone else is like IRL anyway, it's a nation simulation game.

Expressing hateful ideologies and propagating hateful ideologies are a different thing though. In one, you are just telling why you hate a certain group while the latter is about you trying to get others to follow along with your ideologies and hate certain groups. My question really is: Is having prejudices against certain communities and expressing them against the rules? We will a hundred percent assume the person is just telling they don't like a certain community and believe the right way for things to be done is some other way while in no way harassing members of that community or trying to turn others to harassing them. 

As an example(please treat this as an example only), if I were to say I don't agree with the lifestyle of gay people and believe homosexuality to be unnatural, is this against the rules? I am not trying to turn anyone away from living their life as homosexuals but I also refuse to affirm to their lifestyles basically in this statement. 

I truly believe being able to express opinions is a human right as long as said person is not actively trying to transform others' opinions through coercion and harassment.

[Moderation points appeal]

1 minute ago, Alex said:

"showing a dislike of homosexual people"

I know this is a no-discussion forum but I want a clarification of this rule. Am I to believe that showing a dislike for a certain group of people, even if it is personal and in no way being enforced by me on others, a violation of rules. For example, if I say I am not very comfortable around group X or that I do not support group Y, would that be consider as rule-breaking? I truly believe some of the rules are very vaguely defined and the moderators use their own discretion and bias when deciding cases. At times, this leads to people inadvertently breaking rules and getting banned when the rule was never defined in the first place. The greater reason a more codified rule system is needed is because people come from different walks of life and regions with different belief systems. While I am not against moral policing enforced by the liberal west, at least I would like to know the rules I shouldn't break before being banned because my regions' traditions didn't match the western values.

[Game Development Discussion: Beige Feedback]

Just make it so that beige doesn't reduce till all wars have defensive wars have expired. No need to make any other changes other than this really.

[Game Development Discussion: Superiorities Feedback]

We should remove superiorities completely.

My reasoning is simple: The reason there are problems with superiorities is because superiorities are a thing. Removing them will automatically remove all other problems associated with them. Superiorities benefit the larger army. And removing superiorities makes it easier for smaller armies to deal more damage to larger armies. 

[War Rewrite, Test Server Tournament, and Loads of Other Changes! - June 2023 Update]

51 minutes ago, KindaEpicMoah said:

I think randomly distributing cities to players (e.g. most people start as c10, some start as c11s, c12s, etc. until c15) would be the best of both worlds

Have a registration phase for 48 hours. Then distribute cities per current game's city distribution statistics. This distribution can be random ofc. 

[War Rewrite, Test Server Tournament, and Loads of Other Changes! - June 2023 Update]

One of my major complaints about the Test server is that the testing phase, i.e, the initial tournament phase has everyone set equal. In the real game, everyone is not equal. People have different city counts, military, etc. In the test tourney, everyone starts at 10c or so. The test hence cannot in essence capture what a real war would be like.

I think it would be better to transfer over nations from main to test server so things like updeclares, downdeclares, etc can be tested better. Ofc I am not saying all people get moved over. To be moved over, you need to sync your current real server nation to the test one. Could be done using ingame messages. This will create imbalances which will help to mimick real server better.

[[ROH] Carthago's Guide For Dummies: Finance 101]

So you agree FOUNDATION is a scam bank. Good good.

[New Project Discussion]

1 minute ago, Prefontaine said:

Requirement: At least 3,500,000 Soldier kills, 100,000 Tanks destroyed, 10,000 Aircraft destroyed, 1,000 ships destroyed

What about making this for units lost instead? And add another zero.

[[RoH] Hive's the Bad Guy, duh!]

8 hours ago, MinesomeMC said:

SwampyRoseHedge

KERCHTOGLGBTQ+*

[[DOW] The Absolute State of Aurora]

Am I supposed to make a "Rose dogpiles haha" joke or a "Seggsclipse dogpiles haha" joke here because both are gonna be true. Mfw I can't even make a joke here cuz no matter which one I make, it will end up being a lost cause.

[The Skies of Aurora Ignite - Ragnarok Unleashed Upon Midgard]

1 hour ago, BigMorf said:

Aurora has studied at the t$ school for people who can't count to 72.

Pfft.... I can't even count to 7!

[[DoW] Ragnarok Begins]

Just in - Midgard has officially recognized the use of TWO major alliance to be a dogpile. Secret news sources say Rose and T$ have been contacted to reverse the tide of the war.

[City Cool-down Timer Change]

We should have timers from c5 so new players spend credits faster. Make it tiered credit system such that it takes 1 credit to reset till c10, 2 to reset till 20, 3 to reset above.