GeneralJon

I hAvE sO mUcH fUn iN tHiS gAmE

Your post is very confusing, I'm not sure how to respond. Most people shouldn't ban people for no reason though, so it's probably something you said or did. Maybe check with their leader instead?

So if people disagree with you then the thread is no longer civil?

3 different options: 1. Nerf planes 2. Nerf planes 3. Nerf planes yeah... 'Planes are currently the only unit type which can attack other unit types giving them an advantage over other unit types. Please review the options in the OP and vote accordingly on how to balance the issue' Please note that this is a leading question (or poll), 'Vote accordingly on how to balance the issue' suggests that because they give an advantage over other units, they have to be balanced. That might be true, but it also might not be. You are also implying that your solutions are the only way to balance this.

Can we just agree that Alex needs to fix his game lol

Good joke

Dark Atom Preamble Church of Atom and Dark Brotherhood enter into this treaty of mutual defense and optional aggression. Article I: Non Aggression Church of Atom and Dark Brotherhood, referred to hereafter the signatories, come together as friends, and shall make no hostile act against one another. It is agreed to handle any issues between them in private. Article II: Intelligence Both signatories agree to share any intelligence they have obtained and that could prove useful or vital to the other. If either signatory alliance collects intelligence regarding a security breach or a credible threat concerning the other signatory alliance, the acquiring signatory alliance will convey all pertinent information in their possession to the other signatory alliance. Article III: Aid The signatories are encouraged to share technological and monetary assistance with the other if requested. Article IV: Mutual Non-Chaining Defense & Optional Aggression Should either signatory comes under attack, the other signatory pledges all necessary support. This support is waived should it become necessary due to a signatory's obligations towards, or actions undertaken on behalf of a third party. Each signatory also has the option of fighting aggressively alongside the other. Article V: Cancellation Should either signatory wishes to cancel this treaty, it may be cancelled at any time with proper notification to the other alliance, followed by 72 hours. After the 72 hours have passed, the treaty is nullified. Signed for Church of Atom: His Holiness, Pontifex Atomicus - James II Primus Inter Pares - Keza Purple Cardinals: Cardinal Patrick Stewart Cardinal Soxirella Signed for Dark Brotherhood: Listeners: Yoda, Chezstick Speakers: GeneralJon, Spooky Boi, Oh Hweng Jo Silencers: CCJK, Derp Derp Executioners: Louis, Shoba, xSiaNx, Francis Underwood

This rant is even longer than mine

We could easily have rejected those terms. Ever thought about why we agreed upon the terms when it would just mean more fighting? yeah. We were coming to the point where our upper tiers have dropped so much infra they were in the range of GoG's mid tier (wonder why), but I think Olorin/Yoda had some connections with Seeker. Not so much GotG as HS + t$

tell me another joke pls

shit don't expose me

Right so, we entered this war as part of some terms, and yes the war is probably almost over, but we really are trying to revamp our approach when it comes to war and stuff. So, just bear with us. This is just one small step for DB, just still a step nonetheless. If you want to be toxic, go ahead, I can't stop you, but know that we're actually trying to do stuff here.

I couldn't agree more. Our god and savior has responded. All hail woomy

In our defense, we were war dodging and stuff when the war started but we're trying to actually do stuff and break that reputation. I agree, we're really late, but if all DB gets is negative comments, it ain't gonna break the cycle. all praise the woomy