Jump to content

Lupin III

Members
  • Posts

    56
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Lupin III

  1. 13 minutes ago, Insert Name Here said:

    PR wise. If you don't win you're in trouble. It's a risky game takeover move for sure but if it pays off you'll have the game by the balls. Have fun out there on the battlefield NPO, and no hard feelings from me.

    I think at this point, it's like a wall trying to hold against a flood, and in the end that wall is gonna collapse. 

     

    • Like 1
    • Downvote 1
  2. 2 minutes ago, Sir Scarfalot said:

    Look, either “competency by virtue of numbers covering for deficiencies in quality of said numbers” is either a thing or it is not. So is your strategy, as smith points out, to sign as many treaties as possible and accept anyone possible in order to bulk up numbers and thus compete by using numbers to compensate for relative lack of tiering/activity/experience/discipline, or is that not your strategy?

    I mean, doesn't that basically mean that they aren't exactly a hegemony, but a competitor...?   

  3. 1 minute ago, James II said:

    *Cries fowl over alleged consolidation*
    *Consolidates*
    *Gets  mad when people criticize them for ACTUALLY consolidating*

    Sounds a bit like their plan was to declare war, expect them to declare war, whine because they actually did declare war. 

  4. 13 minutes ago, Justin076 said:

    Ok are Syndi-IQ people actually uttering the words along the lines of "we have to deal with a threat to the game" when they have literally consolidated a massive hegemonic blob? A blob thats only competition is two much smaller spheres? 

    Not sure, which is more threatening, upper tier consolidation or mid tier consolidation? 

     

  5. 2 minutes ago, Smith said:

    So you think they are knocking them down so they can get hit in the war they said this is unrelated to?

    Sounds more strategical if you ask me, 'the enemy of my enemy is my friend' , so to speak.

    They did say that they were opportunistic. 

  6. 10 minutes ago, Smith said:

    Grumpy's econ shouldn't matter as t$ has said this war has nothing to do with the ongoing war with BK. They apparently are only hitting them because they are "untouched." Therefore I am playfully pointing out there are targets in BKsphere that are also "untouched" that they could hit. I am not expecting them to actually do it

    Fair enough, but 'untouched' sounds a lot like trying to take them down a notch, so they can actually fight in the war they joined, I suppose there are more reasons outlined simply in 'untouched' than the actual definition, I think it might've been the context around why they were untouched per se 

     

    8 minutes ago, AkAk said:

    No guys, t$ is saying it's just a coincidence that Guardian and Grumpy are destroying anything that moves in BK's formerly upper tier when t$ decided to declare. 

     

    The timing is just unfortunate for appearance's sake. 

    'Destroying' isn't exactly a fight, kinda sounds like an upper-tier dogpile

     

    3 minutes ago, Frawley said:

    Yeah it can, even in war GoB is making roughly 28m per day, per member

    Yeah, I did think that. Well not the exact rough estimates : P

  7. 5 minutes ago, Keegoz said:

    NPO outproduces the entire game, full stop. If you want to bring in who is economically dominant in this game, look no further than N$O.

    I was speaking particularly about the mention that the BK-sphere low tier, has the same impact as the Grumpy/Guardian combo.

    2 minutes ago, Micchan said:

    I can name some alliances with a bigger economy than Grumpy or Guardian, I think you know them

    I don't think you get the comparison I was making, which Smith gave importance to

     

  8. 33 minutes ago, Smith said:

    So when can we expect N$O to hit the low tier targets in BKsphere we can't reach. This will of course also not be considered part of the ongoing war

    Isn't Grumpy able to outproduce, most of the low tier combined? 

    Oh... wait..

    Yes... yes it can...

     

     

  9. 27 minutes ago, Mikey said:

    Also, the idea that we need animosity for war is not healthy for the game.. So we can only work with people we genuinely like and fight people we don't? What happened to the politics side of politics and war? Set some political goals and use war to further them. You and BK are the two strongest spheres in the game, each standing in the way of the other achieving top sphere status. Why not try and claim the throne? There can be other reasons for war besides 'we don't like you.' That can be well and good, but wars purely over personal animosity get real toxic real fast. If that is all we can look forward too, well god help this game.

    I mean.. You can have animosity without it being toxic, I think the fear of creating enemies is particularly something to be avoided. Animosity creates a political goal, an enemy.

    I'm inexperienced in these matters, but it really seems less fun when you don't have someone going for an interesting revenge plot, which in the end, is fueled by animosity, I myself particularly dislike lenient peace negotiations because it doesn't create animosity, saying that it isn't healthy for the game is a fallacy, it creates a 'buddy-buddy' atmosphere which everyone is like "Yeah man, this is just a game, so we don't need to hate each other" and yet even if you understand it is a 'just a game', you can hate the other alliance for destroying you.

    My best example for this, which I have seen or experienced is the long 'grudge' between Nova Riata and Pantheon. Anybody could have hit Pantheon, and yet animosity which was derived from an earlier war created a reason for them to do so, there might have been opportunity in that decision, but the cause was still derived from animosity. It feels like it just gives a 'reason' for the entire conflict, I like to think that the KETOGG war comes from a bit of animosity, of the 69 day war, probably not but I like to think that is the reason. 

    I don't disagree about a split in the former IQ-sphere, even if it takes someone to create "The great betrayal" between BK and NPO, to create animosity. You mention that they're political goal should be to take the throne, but what if it is? Pretty sure that creating less powerful potential enemies is a step toward total domination, I don't think they are trying to avoid war between each other, I think it's more of a contest to remove all potential enemies, and then attempt to outgun each other without that risk.

    Probably created a speel of nonsense, but oh well, take it as you will.

  10. 39 minutes ago, Curufinwe said:

     

    Nitpicking a bit, but isn't what your doing  Ad Hominem and Tu Quoque...

    Just putting it out there, and I don't have very much experience in the field, but Buorhann being a hypocrite, which is debatable, or less qualified to argue or in your own words "why is it that you feel that you're in a position to criticize BK for not contributing enough to keeping PW interesting?"

    Doesn't really make Buorhann less valid to say what he wants on BK

    Just my take on it 

  11. "Yeah Scarfalot, your in KETOGG, which means you hate blocs growing, which means you want to destroy them, which makes your arguments invalid, which makes ALL of KETOGG's arguments invalid, because they are obviously trying to undermine blocs, by disagreeing with us, because you can't disagree with us, otherwise you want to destroy blocs, ALL blocs, and because BK is the one you are arguing against, you are also against BK, because you are arguing against them, which makes your arguments invalid, which makes me right, which makes every point you make wrong, because your in KETOGG, and that makes everything we say right, and you can't argue against that...." 

    Haha.... Oh.

     

    • Haha 1
    • Downvote 2
  12. Congratulations to my friends in AK, for this movement, very happy to where the alliance and it's pals, are now. I do have some issues I keep seeing though...

    My opinions are sided toward most of the criticism that has been dished out, explaining that an bloc such as yourself, military and economically powerful and capable of handling itself is 'hiding' behind BK, although I would argue that it wouldn't be a problem if someone declared war, but I feel that if you guys were losing, BK would most likely step in, and currently I can agree a lot with the resemblance of the Vanguard Bloc, much to my dismay.

    Another point, I see thrown a lot is "We will do this after! Or "Change doesn't happen overnight" is a bit loose, I can believe that you've thought about this for a long time, but Foreign Affairs really needs to be thought out before doing a huge step, not that I am experienced in it, but as an observer, it seems very much so, to be a huge point which should have been addressed but seems to have either been ignored, which is pretty silly seeing how Vanguard did and the lessons from that, or you otherwise have plans to have BK as a protectorate which doesn't seem to be the case, seeing as how you guys keep commenting about how it will change. I don't want to believe that it is sheer incompetence, knowing a few of you  and I'm too inexperienced to think beyond common-sense in the field, but that's just my viewpoint on the subject.

    My silly analogy was, that this is like a half-made game, and the rest of the content is in the DLC, where can I get "Citadel vol 2" ?

    Well congratulations again, and great flag! 

    - Just 'Jim'  or other forgotten names... 

  13. I may be considered a traitor etc within the NR members and I don't blame them, but I have to say

    Nova Riata was probably one of the most active and fun alliances I have ever been in, the voice chats were very involving, accepted anyone into their conversations, and out of game, they are great guys and continue to be, and despite the setbacks in-game I wish for them a successful future, even if that sounds hypocritical. All those poker games were fun, would like to play again, if any of you are free.

    Uriah, you are a great guy, although we didn't speak much, I think you are a pretty cool guy, and not to forget the fact that you made an entire alliance worship foxes, had fun with poker, when we were last in the game, you beat me, but it was fun nonetheless

    Viselli, we may have gotten on the wrong foot after I left, but I can still remember all those crazy poker games, introducing me, and being important to my time in NR

    Sondi, Smooth Irish accent, haha, but very cool to be around with, the poker games, one of my most challenging opponents, very involving, just all around cool guy, very funny.

    Njordor, introduced me to NR entirely on the get go, and a large part why I joined in the first place, always defusing tense situations, always being funny, looking out for others

    Pooball, outside of the game, outside of cheating, he honestly was fun to be around with, his English tone, the time when I think it was Njordor or Sondi tried to get him to go all in on me when I had a Flush was very funny, and one of my best moments, really made the banter that much more

     Jason or whatever your name is now, fun banter, interesting conversations, next time you try a business, look into it before buying! : P 

    Boofy, the wise old bovine of the alliance, really got the conversations within the alliance all that more fun, cool guy altogether.

     

    Most of this is going to be my short experience in Poker, and in the alliance, but it was definitely incredible to be in it, having something that hardly any other alliance could achieve to have, or even dream of having, a very inviting community, an active community, sure it's great, but getting new people instantly into the affairs on the first day is legendary. Sorry that it had to end so abruptly and quickly, but if any one of you guys want to create an poker game, I'll be sure to invite me, haha, I'll spend another night on it.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.