Jump to content

gerry oldsworth III

Members
  • Posts

    67
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Profile Information

  • Leader Name
    Gerry Oldsworth III
  • Nation Name
    LAZX
  • Nation ID
    125407
  • Alliance Name
    Paradise

Contact Methods

  • Discord Name: LarzarisN#1241

Recent Profile Visitors

1164 profile views

gerry oldsworth III's Achievements

Active Member

Active Member (3/8)

138

Reputation

  1. Truely awful, 100% would not recommend to anyone else. 10/10 thank you for your service o7
  2. haha! i made the perfect meme for this hours ago, and shall now post it in every forum i can to get attention!
  3. 75 is a sweet spot where it's pretty much balanced, speaking as a c28 who had to shed almost all my infra and buy money off the market to compensate for the amount i lose because of my low infra. (and most of us just want to see this whole matter dropped cause almost every update the mod team wants to change that modifier and it never fixes any of the underlying issues)
  4. @His Holy DecagonThis is despicable, now that I think back you didn't pay me back my taxes either! #CancelDeca
  5. Why dont you put a captcha on spyoping someone to stop people from scraping but still letting people find spy counts manually? Maybe even bring back the old spy success system.
  6. And even worse, the actual treaty did include the bit about everything being in private, which llo has just broken (again), along with this being a forum post which breaks rule 2 which was in the real treaty. So please LLO keep the good word of waffles out of your mouth
  7. It could be like taxes, the alliance takes a certain percent of the nations military. Then the nation cant access it so that it forces alliances to be more cohesive and act quicker. imo you shouldn't put a limit on the amount you can send or the time that you can send them so that we can have huge proxy wars start between two tiny nations with like 1mil troops (but still require the nations to foot most of the bill for these troops or make a limit where it costs more to keep them). This would also add an element to the early parts of wars where an alliance can stockpile troops to counter a blitz. Then you could put a troop trading system, where large nations could sell their military on the market for a quick buck. Or alliances could support eachother in proxy wars through massive trades like the trade system we have now (like the rss trade but with soldiers, imagine the amount of meta gaming and stuff we could do with that). (and allow alliances to send these troops to anyone willing to accept the trade for them) And even if you've sold your troops on a lease you still have them taking up your capacity. And instead of the troops being stored in an alliance bank sort of thing, they could be stored in a nation where the alliance chooses to send them (where that nation could not send them out if blockaded). sorry if none of this makes any sense, I'm really really tired
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.