Limbuwan

What did you do to get that vote ? As i see it, you’re not even eligible for your name to be on it. Not yet atleast.

https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=480265 https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=480181 Please include this wars : )

BK STRONK

@RyanK your other half is leaving. Are you crying ?

You can talk all you want on her being nicest player but https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=93641 i have facts who actually won the round last year : )

Weird. I find the opposite fits more when compared to current orbis scenario.

The similar option has been proposed by Sir Scarf somewhere

what kind of reasoning is this "Annoying"? if you're pinned and 5 days are up then wait for login bonus tear down the city to what infra can support and go declare really low and inactives which will give you money, rinse and repeat. As for this new player/alliance problem, this is an unintended benefit. We'll have less alliance which is poorly run and hopefully treaty web mess is reduced. The one who can still run an alliance by then would have fairly good experience and has connections so they won't get bothered even if the global is ongoing.

That improvement fail affect comes after 5 days according to original suggestion so no it wont be annoying. I have no idea why you keep saying it’s not invincible as akuryo posted 20 nukes for just 1 city is kind of invincible. What do you mean by reset city 1. This change is to put an end to unlimited supply of RSS and not for the benefit of one sphere or other.

The original thread says there is a five days wait period so plenty of time to keep doing what you want to and when our nation gets wrecked we generally only rebuild to sufficient infra level. if our military improvement gets destroyed then we tear down other improvements to make room for military so there should not be issue on rebuying. This will also keep dmgs low and end globals quickly but makes wars frequently given there is no long period of NAP.

No building improvement depends on infras so it's only logical if we don't have infras those improvements should stop working. personally i'm in favour of turning cities off completely if the infra/improvement ratio is not adjusted within ~2days(Actual war length/fastest beige). Nuking is inefficient and costly.

This is the thread that needs to be discussed - https://forum.politicsandwar.com/index.php?/topic/25437-addressing-the-invincibility-of-improvements/

EDIT

sounds like you hated my earlier spoken truth. As for selling down infra at what cost ? even if he and other did sell down the dmg done by this action to his opponents is no where near than self inflicted dmg. And please why don't your allies build up and hit our high tier in your losing battle you find yourself instead of selling and going down to hide under the rock. and no i was not smart enough to know she'd refuse to fight and peace out immediately. I was thinking she really will launch her nukes.

Beli wouldn't had made the first move if he cared about nukes at all. It's exactly because she has nukes that he went in. So what's your point about crying ?

BK STRONK

War loss is still a war lose regardless of offensive or defensive.

Is this another round about bait ?

ThE sYnDicAtE aNd iTs AfFiLiaTeS hAvE nO inTeNt To ExPaNd ThEir WaR oN tHe CoALitiOn CuRrEnTLy FigHtiNg ThE bLAcK kNigHtS aNd ThEir ALLieS bEyOnD gUaRdiAn AnD gRuMpY oLD bAsTaRdS.

***ThE sYnDicAtE aNd iTs AfFiLiaTeS hAvE nO inTeNt To ExPaNd ThEir WaR oN tHe CoALitiOn CuRrEnTLy FigHtiNg ThE bLAcK kNigHtS aNd ThEir ALLieS bEyOnD gUaRdiAn AnD gRuMpY oLD bAsTaRdS.***

Horsemen is in ?

Nice. Thanks

Polaris joined as well for BK side : )

BK Stronk

Hyperborea just attacked Rose