Darzy

True, nova wanted TF to have some fun too though

It's not about being positive about pantheon, it's about keeping the community alive by keeping a positive attitude with respect to any alliance, even if they may be in a sad state of affairs like pantheon is. 'Why does anyone care about you again?' isn't a great way to keep this community alive, a positive attitude makes this game more fun instead of constantly telling people they are garbage which seems to be all you do on the forums. Hence, positive attitude, as usual.

Find me a better one, or else it will be best thread 21st century...

Brilliant

Very interesting. I'd never heard of that before.

I am so confused.

Holy fricking shit, what is that

How do you delete a city?

While playing it cool is usually the better option, I'm not sure that they're truly wrong in wanting to wrap things up. Perma-global-war seems unhealthy for this game, at least from my perspective. Many will quit, as someone said a while ago about 'vacillators' or something, ordinary players who make up the masses in this game. Now I get it, many people think that that's good, it would leave only quality players behind, willing to fight to a bitter end, or no end at all even. However, the game wouldn't grow, it would just be the same old people if we were in permawar between the same people, no change of scenery and no dynamic interplay between allies and enemies. For example, say peace comes about at this moment. Everyone knows what the dynamic will be then, a $yndisphere vs IQ power struggle, sides of similar strength. While I can't predict the result, the ensuing conflict will at least be INTERESTING. All I can say is, as a non-participant in this war, the longer it goes on, the less I am interested in the politics of this game, not saying that I reflect the views of everyone, but I am saying that peace for a short while may be better for the game than a 3/4/5 month war.

Weird peace but ok

Thanks guys, your thoughts have been duly noted. Thanks for showing me this post, gives me a whole new perspective on how this game has formed over time, especially considering that it only happened about a year and a half ago.

Hello, to anyone who may read this. This game seems to be called, 'politics and war' to describe how the game should be played, using politics, and war to continue that politics I guess. However, not everyone really plays the game this way, for example, until recently many people outside of certain fighting alliances have sat and simply grown their nation. That being said, many of these people have been criticised for this playstyle, with the critics citing the name of the game as 'politics and war' not 'politics and peace' or some other form. However, with an economic approach to the game clearly being allowed or even it could be said, encouraged, one would think that, 'Politics, Economics and War' would be a more apt description of this game if one were truly desiring to briefly summarise the game in a few words. If the game were truly about politics and war, it would be much more military focused I believe, with say, 6 barracks 6 factories 7 hangars and 4 drydocks cap for example, so that people could demonstrate their true dedication of their resources into military might. Instead, there exists a 5/5/5/3 setup which every nation takes into war, backed by their AA bank, showing a more economic approach to conserving resources and managing stockpiles that allow every player, not just the military madmen, to be putting their entire nation's effort into war. Now, net damage is generally a good way of separating the two types of people, however, my point is, if the game really were 50% war as the name suggests, then I don't think it is a problem with the people who choose not to war, but the lack of factors in game that make it 50% war instead of 33% as suggested above. My point basically is, many like to blame people for not all loving 'politics and war.' However, if there exists as many un-warlike playstyles as war-like playstyles, those other playstyles should be given a voice too instead of being rejected due to the name of the game being too simplistic. I do understand this is much, much less catchy. (P,E&W?) However, I'd just like to understand and hear others' thoughts on why the economic side of the game was not featured in the title.

lmao

@everyone Attention all PnW Gamers, ORBIS UNITED ALLIANCES is in great danger, and needs YOUR help to MUTE all the channels in the server. To do this, they need A WORKING GOV. To help them, all they need is your credit card number, the three numbers on the back, and the expiration month and date. But you gotta be quick so that ORBIS UNITED ALLIANCES can secure those credits, and achieve the epic victory R O Y A L.

IT HAS BEEN DECREED ON ORBIS UNITED ALLIANCES THAT INFRA IS NOW BANNED, SELL DOWN OR BE ROLLED

RIOT RIOT RIOT RIOT RIOT

^ this, an alliance such as Camelot has no reason to destroy their reputation over 50 million, heck, even if it were 50 billion it still wouldn't be worth it. This looks more like a failed attempt to defame Camelot than anything else, stay safe Creed!

While I agree with your other points, I would just like to point out to you that it wouldn't just be you looking through those cases but instead, several, both from your side and TKRsphere, since they are likely to investigate why their own members VM'ed during the war too. No hard feelings, just pointing out that the logistics of figuring out who legitimately VM'ed would be relatively simple.

While I know many of the fighting alliances would have fun with this, wouldn't some team captains just pick their own allies anyway?

Not that I'm against you, but I'm pretty sure they want you to beige them, I think it helps them more ?

Relatively, no it was a very small-scale conflict. We're not claiming to make this a big deal, but we felt that this was a necessary formality regardless of the actual impact and size of the conflict.

I am, but I guess, this isn't the only game I play to have fun, I prefer talking to others for fun. I have time to do other stuff but I understand that other people like to war, no problems with that :3

I mean, sure, we're not here to make enemies :3

Hello people, We will be withdrawing from our wars that were declared against the Dixie Union. For us at least, peace has arrived. We will not be declaring any further wars over the course of this global. Thank you for your time. Edit: We won't be aiding anyone in war either (i.e. intelligence, money etc.) Edit 2: Oopsie

Damn! The story just got better