Hwan

Too bad the game won't let me peace Rose...

This is BAD. There's no way i'd find it fun to click train for like 500 resources every day just so i can end up rolling a d20 for a useful trait and a 3% boost to army value. The newest update to the plan makes it like 3 times as hard to level up generals which already sounded really hard. Also friendly battle isn't clear. Is it just like, you do a mock battle but spend the gas and muni? Because if i had to use 1000 gas and muni doing an airstrike every day i'd just not do it. Half the playerbase can't be assed to even log in for 2m a day and you think they'll train, do mock battle, and *spend* 2m to train a general by 0.1%? So buff them, reduce RNG, and make it cheaper and simpler to train, or else this is just feature bloat.

This guy sold 1.5b infra, don't trust him!

This is a fairly common question and i couldn't find something like this so i'll list the policies needed for each of the extremes in one place. First of all, to understand the policies, there's 2 separate scales: Social: affected exclusively by Cannabis, Mandatory Service, Capital Punishment, Prohibition, Assisted Suicide, Same-Sex Marriage, Campaign Finance, Speech, Hard Drugs, Immigration, Gun Rights, Religion, Torture and Abortion. Economic: affected exclusively by Secondary Education, Unions, Spending, Healthcare, Taxes and Welfare. Note that Energy, Infant Circumcision and Polygamist Marriage have little to no effect. Now i will provide a screenshot of what policies can be used to get each extreme, and you might have to scroll down. I've blacked out the non-relevant ones in each case. (And if you want to be somewhere in the middle, simply play around with the options) How to get Anarchist How to get Fascist How to get Extreme Left How to get Extreme Right

10% in the scenario a guy has level 10 while the other didn't even bother to get the free one. Realistically the difference is gonna be like level 3 vs 8 at best. The traits sound like an RNG nightmare, since only like 1 in 4 actually help combat (and even then with very small bonuses), not to mention the proposed small general lifespan and the chance of kicking the bucket even earlier. Superiorities aren't really all-or-nothing, you can get at least a PV with like half the military nowadays, and having something of a 3% bonus chance to get it won't do too much to help. Overall, as-is, this is just convoluted feature bloat.

So all of that for like a 5% boost in minimum roll?

But all of these are correct

Are you really this upset because you got spied? Anyway you beiged him now gimme the 10m

I think they should be revealable with a spy op, otherwise only alliance gov should be able to see perks and research, the way warchests can be seen.

I actually disagree, planes are definitely more balanced now, at least compared to what they were before. And yes, having more people at update should be a big deal since that's a great factor determining how active an alliance is.

Bye Cata hope you get ROLLED.

Nice try but Alex magically "found no evidence" when we reported.

First off, yes, being active should be an advantage. And i repeat, this would heavily discourage close wars and encourages dogpiles. Since it's already a big numbers game and this would make it even moreso. Because a 200 man sphere gets rolled by 40 guys that doesn't mean we should immediately rework war.

No brain involved and you just use your numbers advantage? And it heavily discourages starting wars? This update would basically mean that to get a proper IT you need to do like 5 airstrikes and if they get anything other than an UF in the meanwhile it resets.

So we've come full circle from "let's encourage starting wars" to "blitz strong, pls nerf"? This would make it nigh impossible for an underdog to gain any meaningful advantage! If you want to get an advantage as a defender you have counters at your disposal, you shouldn't be supposed to win your defensive wars outright over a party who put in the effort to organize a blitz. Additionally, it would make it even more of a numbers slogfest if IT's are basically impossible to gain within a reasonable timeframe.

What's the point in letting players vote if they want more free money

The "crime": The punishment: @Robot SantaNani the !@#$?

Bye Rose hope you get ROLLED.

Yeah just put an end to its misery already I don't see why you would keep it around when it clearly only brings problems again and again. Just so people can get baited into spending an hour to click for what i make in a turn? (at this point it's probably handled by scripts anyway)

5th Syndi post in a row, for the haters.

Meaningless wars - Nothing important to fight over, and in a "multi-polar" world, it's even detrimental, since fighting anyone simply sets you back in the city race with no compensation other than setting another sphere behind as well (since peace terms are also banned here), so you lose even if you win. (not to mention the possibility of a third party fighting you after you win). Internal politics/democracies - Not enough players, or at least active ones, to run a democracy or any meaningful internal competition. The people who want to work in X department will always be working there. Political RP - Well, if you're a nerd, nothing's stopping you from going for it. But obviously don't expect everyone to partake. And forums are sooo 2000's

No clue what "use names" means but i want the 10m so perhaps posting bounty. https://politicsandwar.com/world/bounties/ https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=238910 You're welcome.

No offense but didn't you "quit" the game like 3 times already?

As accurate as it gets.