Codonian
-
Posts
499 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by Codonian
-
-
I was still undecided on what i'd do until I read the replies here, You're all exactly the reason why MEMBERS from GoG/NPO and BK are deciding to bow out with their alliances.
We Are.... Groot
-
Just now, Alex said:
Again, the question was asked theoretically. They didn't state "hey, we've been doing this specific thing, is it okay?"
Surely you can understand there's a difference between hypothetical, vague scenarios and specific events.
Surely you can understand that if someone is asking about it, and you give them the "gut feeling" okay, you should PROBABLY get some clarification on the situation then, and not 3 months after that?
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Alex said:
I've posted the entire logs of that conversation for everyone to see, publicly. It's linked to in the official report document.
Again, even if that had been an official response, that question was asked in late November, 2 months after GPWC had already been formed and this had already been ongoing.
Okay so they asked 2 months after they did it... you're responding 5 months after they did it.
Amazing admin skills Alex.
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, Alex said:
Senry asked me in November (in a conversation I didn't think much about) what my "gut reaction" would be to a situation similar to this one. He did not state that it was actually happening (and had been by that point for 2 months.) I did not "okay" anything, or know that they were trading access to manhwa for people who had no interest in the game setting up tax farming nations and literally being told not to play the game.
I'm one of the few that have seen the most recent conversation you held with NPO in it's entirety, you handled the situation piss poor when it was CLEAR that he was asking you originally if that would be fine, to which you said it would be a mechanics issue, not a moderation one.
You're the god damn admin of the game, your gut reaction should be your official stance.
-
2
-
-
3 minutes ago, Alex said:
ITT: Lots of people who haven't read the full report yet.
ITT: A lot of people ignoring the screenshot that shows you KNEW and said it was a mechanics issue, not a moderation one. Get fricked dick.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
This is how you kill your game, congratulations.
-
13
-
1
-
-
8 minutes ago, Kastor said:
Someone tell me.
I imagine because neither side have come to an agreement the other is happy with? Could it be that simple?
-
fricking hell, they've grown
-
2
-
-
Just now, Alex said:
Why couldn't a nation with 10 cities create an alliance, have a 0.01 score nation join the alliance, then the 10 city nation leaves?
That doesn't really solve the problem.
So then also add in a clause that removes an alliance that has sub 10 cities. You can't destroy cities ingame so that prevents genuine alliance getting deleted.
-
20 minutes ago, Alex said:
To all the people downvoting my original post:
What about this? https://politicsandwar.com/alliance/id=6045
Do you think this is fine? This is de-facto invulnerable bank looting anyway. Very rarely do banks actually get looted in the status-quo. Eliminating bank looting isn't going to change much in terms of gameplay, it's just going to get rid of a lot of the confusing offshore 1-man alliances.
Having the cap on alliance banks will ensure that you can actually loot more because nations will have to store a lot more money/rss.
So then just change alliance creation to require 10 or more cities. That fixes that. You're welcome
-
2
-
-
1 minute ago, Kastor said:
I think thats fair but those leaders are destroyed now, by the time they're ready to fight again(if you grow), you'll be at the same city range with more people, so it'll be "easier" for you not to lose again.
Why should we give them the ability to regrow just for us to be back in this exact same situation in 6-9 months again? If they want to pursue an 'all out war' mindset that's perfectly fine, but you can expect the same mindset in response.
-
1 minute ago, Khandov said:
Guys, it's official. IQ existence has now entered superposition.
It seems they can't quite decide whether IQ exists or not, despite at the start of the war they were quite adamant it did!
-
2 hours ago, Justin076 said:
Yes people delete in wars, they are weak. But in these long wars where nations are essentially deemed useless and sat on for periods longer than two months can force anyone to just peace out or delete. These long wars are the death of the game, so you've got what you wanted IQ.
I haven't got what I wanted yet, the game still exists. Only reason I've stuck around is because of the amount of years i've invested into it already.
-
Presumably this will be/ is now fixed then? Also noticed this issue happen with me numerous times over the last few months but I just figured it was indeed a glitch on my end
-
Well i'm glad I just spent an hour catching up on this dumpster fire of a thread (/s). The only person that said anything with a shred of common sense was Ivk when he said that each side is going to have their preconceptions and that's it's useless trying to change each others mind. Going to go lie down in a dark and quiet room now...
-
1
-
-
36 minutes ago, Maia said:
At least he put effort in it and you don't! ?
I wonder why that could be?
-
Just now, Dusk said:
That's because y'all have no minds of your own.
Atleast I don't go 8 pages back to reply to a comment ??
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 minute ago, Spectral said:This is absolutely pathetic. Enjoy the wars, and dont forget your history with karma bby.
-
2
-
8
-
I for one, welcome our new NPO overlords.
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, JesterTheSheep said:
Even Alphas need to eat.
We'll just eat the corpses of the weak
-
2
-
-
-
18 minutes ago, RyanK said:
@Codonian rip there goes our slot for pooball
damn
-
Me when I find another kopite
-
1
-
Announcement - Guardians of the Galaxy
in Alliance Affairs
Posted
Nobody gives a shit to read your threads, our members were reading THIS one and the one regarding BK, both had these types of toxic comments.