Potato
-
Posts
94 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by Potato
-
-
Join a poker discord server or something, definitely not something that needs to be done ingame.
-
Oh, I actually made this suggestion on one of your previous posts. I disagree with replacing it, just buff spying infra with a chance of destroying improvements.
-
1
-
5
-
-
I always liked my nation quote- "If god wanted you alive he wouldn't have sent me" -Genghis Khan.
-
2
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
"Man who leaks everything he can get his hands on in an attempt to gain popularity isn't told stuff by influential officials, utterly confused why"
-
26
-
3
-
1
-
All sound pretty reasonable and balanced at first look. I wonder how meta picking up the 2 land projects will be for whales.
-
Aluminum simply is not being spent in wars, and I completely disagree with the others here about increasing the steel cost of tanks, if you look at the worldwide total steel graphs you'll see that tanks are at a good place price wise.
-
6
-
-
@Lord Tyrion I assure you that nuke sniping was definitely something that happened, and bots were not used. That being said I think you're right and the game should be more clear about when a nuke/missile is spyable, nothing is more annoying than a person basically spy slotfilling someone because they don't realize the nuke is protected.
As for pre, perhaps buff spy vs infra? It's literally so bad that it's a meme, so maybe let the spy kill some infra and a random improvement (excluding NPPs). It wouldn't make it overly strong, but it would give the function some use.
-
5
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Maybe make nukes cost 250 aluminum and uranium more (up to 1000 aluminum/ 500 uranium) but make nukes destroy 5 improvements instead of 2. Personally when I get nuked I really don't care, I won't have to rebuild the city 90% of the time. Nukes currently are near exclusively for infra damage, but what if there was that risk of the nuke really destroying enough that you have to rebuild the city?
-
15
-
1
-
Higher infra = higher risk = higher reward. If you have 4k infra and make a ton of cash every day it should come with some risk, and if you're at 600 infra with no passive income it should come with some benefit (or raiders would find life incredibly hard.) You may not see raiding as a "valid" way to play, but they still exist and shouldn't be pushed out of the game.
-
4
-
-
Why would anyone sign this? "Oh I know we are at war but their precious infra" i just don't see the point of the treaty
-
1
-
-
You really think this would have the effect of "smaller alliances having a chance to survive"? That alone tells me you haven't given it enough thought.
-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
-
9
-
3
-
If goose is sexy does that mean golden goose is even more sexy?
-
5
-
1
-
-
I must say this is a bold play, best of luck to both sides.
-
Projects come from infra, if you look at most pirate nations they have more projects than their infra can support. They also have like sub 1000 infra per city. I'm sure many pirates would like this project, but it's entirely infeasible due to the cost of buying that much infra for a single project.
-
3
-
-
It's amazing for new players who may not know what discord is, but for players who are more established It's kinda useless imo
-
2
-
-
This is a pretty interesting idea with a nice graphic alongside, however can we make that graphic a separate page instead of a pop-up to be more mobile friendly?
-
Everyone knows the best way to prevent bots is a very predictable timing on the captcha. Even if that was a good idea that would be incredibly annoying to have to login every single turn instead of just doing a captcha.
-
3
-
-
You all seem to have forgotten to put lordaeron in the S tier, what a silly mistake.
-
2
-
1
-
-
Wait there isn't already an option to add all? I think this is a great suggestion.
-
This is very easily abused and basically means that every war declared leads to the defensive person getting beiged no matter what. You may ask how, well let's say I declare war on you and do 1 ground attack to eliminate 10 resistance. All you need to do is. . . Wait, and you've won the war. There is no point in declaring offensive wars in a global because the defender will always get 6+ days of beige no matter what you do. Alex may be trying to get people to fight in wars that are declared, but I assure you this will do the exact opposite and make the meta literally not doing anything in defensive wars.
-
6
-
2
-
-
Dear Ciprian the 1st,
The nation of Golden Goose cannot support the funding of your rebuild. We cannot justify to our people funding an organization who's sole purpose is to loot and pillage.
From,
Potpie99
-
Valid CB
-
TEst is going to win, TLE is gonna do great tho
New National Project Ideas
in Game Suggestions
Posted
Number 1 is useless
Number 3 is absolutely broken, I have relatively low land for a food producer and it would still near double my income. I can't even begin to imagine how much someone like wampus could make.