Daniel Storm

Nation: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=186458 Nature of Violation: 11/26 08:59 am - The Greater German Reich declared war on Bobland for the reason of "Sieg Heil! I must take your bounty!". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sieg_Heil

git gud. You have cranked steel units and high infra. If you're going to score inflate like that, you need to account for raiders coming after you. Especially as a member of a weak alliance that can't protect you.

Yeah that's what I figured, but there have been a lot of comments like Cypher's asserting the certainty that there was some agreement reached between BK-TCW and NPO-T$ which confuses me since that seems like a huge smoking gun if they have proof.

I'm just a regular guy looking for some juice, sorry to disappoint you by not giving a detailed response about a peace process I have no involvement in and know nothing about ?

So you're just the man I'm looking for! ? I've been waiting to see the proof of collaboration from BK-TCW & NPO-T$ for months, not these weakass statements of individual intent. Bring out the goods my man, was there a solidified agreement? a joint statement of intent? a planning channel? maybe even a preliminary target sheet? Show me what you've got! There has to be something for everyone to be so damn certain of this collaborative plan.

The logs where Sphinx says they're going to hit Chaos, and that they are "in talks with T$-NPO where they will hit KETOG"? Those logs? The ones that only show the BK-TCW position and contain no evidence that NPO-T$ actually colluded with BK-TCW, and developed a plan for war? That's all you've got? Oh jeepers I'm sorry, with all the certainty being thrown around that there was a concrete joint plan by BK-TCW&NPO-T$ I assumed there must be incontrovertible evidence of this plan somewhere, surely you all wouldn't act like you were absolutely certain of this joint plan when your only evidence is a statement from one party that they intended to approach the other. Now that T$ is on your side it shouldn't be that hard to dig up such a plan so what's the delay?

Great point! I'm sure your representatives in the negotiation will finally provide their proof of that accusation in order to secure more favorable terms! Right?

You're right, it's calculating off of 45,000 soldiers per city instead of 15,000. 1 sec. Fixed

It's exactly 1 city like Alex said. 5 Barracks 5 Factories 5 Hangars 3 Drydocks

@Alex Prefontaine's post about reducing the cost of tanks and increasing the cost of planes got me thinking about how damned cheap war is, and what a fractional cost most non-tank units are. So I would like to present an alternate proposal that we avoid making war any cheaper than it already is, and instead increase the costs of other units to be more in line with that of tanks. Right now if you were to fully militarize, over 57% of your costs would be spent purely on tanks. Followed by 27% on ships, 15% on planes, and 1% on soldiers. With that in mind I propose that unit costs be re-balanced to the following numbers or something similar. This is a pretty conservative proposal, and I'm not married to any of the numbers, but I think it offers a decent visualization of my idea. As you can see these changes would greatly increase the cost of the current "cheap" Aircraft and Soldier units, while keeping Ships roughly on par with where they are now, and making tanks much cheaper in a relative sense, without actually reducing their cost. Given how dirt-cheap war is, and that in the current economic meta any competent alliance can keep fighting indefinitely, I think it would be a mistake to reduce the cost of any military unit, instead costs of cheap units should be increased to make the expensive unit (tanks) a more attractive option.

I'm against the general principle of changing the war system during a war, but none of these are substantive enough to really affect anything.

Then why are you guys trying to surrender? If you read the OP you'll see its about Partisan being given the runaround while trying to surrender.

Welp, Press F for Christmas peace. Valentines peace maybe?

Nation Link: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=181950 Ruler Name: Freshly bathed Marie Nature of Violation: The second image is some Rule34 shit. I would screenshot it, but then I'd be posting an inappropriate image.

The micro bloc stole Pantheon's bank and then started raiding them, and now you're crying foul because their MDPs are defending them. That's the exact purpose of an MDP not bullying, what did you expect them to do? Bend over? imo both sides are irrelevant micros, but if TCM can't handle the heat then it should get out of the kitchen.

This sounds like a fun turn. And the loan thing is clever if you can convince people to default. However, I have to echo other commenters and wonder why you aren't hitting Demacia if this is such a big deal to you. It's almost like your moral imperative is being overwritten by fear of TCW and Rose.

Can't say I understand the point in faking and releasing logs that paint you in a negative light. Generally the only advantage to that is to find leakers, but by leaking it yourself directly to Shifty that benefit is kinda eliminated. Good for y'all I guess?

If you're gonna talk shit, you should be able to get hit.

Nation Link: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=184940 Name(s) in question: You really gotta ask? How hard are word filters anyway.

Damn that's quite the alternative fact.

afaik TKR jacked us around for months. Which makes all the whining from TKR members upset that this peace process hasn't been instant rather ironic.

I can't seem to find your alliance on the treaty web anymore. Could you please point it out to me? Thanks ?

I recognize your name from somewhere, you play NS?

What about GOB, weren't you just dying to restore their whale tier control? Must have been hard to stay out with how good friends you guys are.